Sarmat Mitzne
Sarmat


- From:
- Sarmat
- Ukraine
- Style:
- European Strong Lager
- ABV:
- 7.5%
- Score:
- +6 ratings needed
- Avg:
- 2.22 | pDev: 15.32%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 4
- Status:
- Retired
- Rated:
- Feb 16, 2025
- Added:
- Mar 11, 2006
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 0
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews.
Reviewed by Sinfull from New York
1.81/5 rDev -18.5%
look: 2.75 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 1.75 | feel: 1.75 | overall: 1.75
1.81/5 rDev -18.5%
look: 2.75 | smell: 1.75 | taste: 1.75 | feel: 1.75 | overall: 1.75
Golden color, thin head. Sweet and alcohol aroma. Why Ukrainian brewers can't make a strong beer without alcohol smell and taste???? Hardly drinkable.
Feb 16, 2025Reviewed by trentley87 from Michigan
2.03/5 rDev -8.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2
2.03/5 rDev -8.6%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2
I found a bottle of this, in all places, at a rain forest lodge in Ecuador. Judging from the condition of the bottle, it had been aging for a while. My first experience with this style was not pleasant, especially after trying this breweries good porter in the same establishment. Overcarbonated (but strangely, with little to no head) and dominated by the flavor of alcohol are the two most dominant characteristics of this beer. Drinkability of this was also poor for me due to the carbonation and high alcohol content. One of these was enough.
Jul 03, 2007Reviewed by ernie from Russian Federation
2.32/5 rDev +4.5%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2
2.32/5 rDev +4.5%
look: 2 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2
Strong lager can be delicious and even delightful, but not this one, unfortunately.
First of all, it's over-carbonated, bubbly just like soda pop. Head is bubbly, too, and dies in a minute. No lace.
Smell is malty with a strong hint of white spirit.
Alcohol is unmasked in the taste. You begin to feel it immediately, it dominates over malts and sugars. If not for this, taste is quite interesting, with its soft fruitiness and candyish notes. Mouthfeel hard (probably from the water). Aftertaste liquorish, long, not quite clean.
Won't recommed it.
Jul 05, 2006First of all, it's over-carbonated, bubbly just like soda pop. Head is bubbly, too, and dies in a minute. No lace.
Smell is malty with a strong hint of white spirit.
Alcohol is unmasked in the taste. You begin to feel it immediately, it dominates over malts and sugars. If not for this, taste is quite interesting, with its soft fruitiness and candyish notes. Mouthfeel hard (probably from the water). Aftertaste liquorish, long, not quite clean.
Won't recommed it.
Reviewed by Globetrotter from Virginia
2.72/5 rDev +22.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2
2.72/5 rDev +22.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2
Found in a central Moscow kiosk, I've been looking for beers from this brewery for about three years. Sleek brown half liter bottle with a gold and red label featuring a couple eagles flanking the brewery's symbol (a barley stock in front of a full mug under the year 1962). Ingredients include rice and sugar. Best before 5/3/06, I opened it on 3/11/06.
Pours a clear, pale, bubbly straw gold under a one finger white head that has some contour and fades somewhat less than visibly, leaving no lace but a fairly decent collar. The nose is very subdued, to the point of non-existence. Perhaps a bit of sweet fruitiness emerges.later, but nothing every comes through loud and clear. The mouth is very prickly and fairly syrupy. The taste is surprisingly mild for the style, with a touch of grape reminiscent of wine. As it warms, metallic hops emerge, giving the experience a harsher tone. The bitterness finally overwhelms the sweet, leaving an acrid tone more likely to generate gagging than a desire for more. The first impression was quite good, but ultimately this is little better than other Soviet style strong beers. No thanks.
Mar 11, 2006Pours a clear, pale, bubbly straw gold under a one finger white head that has some contour and fades somewhat less than visibly, leaving no lace but a fairly decent collar. The nose is very subdued, to the point of non-existence. Perhaps a bit of sweet fruitiness emerges.later, but nothing every comes through loud and clear. The mouth is very prickly and fairly syrupy. The taste is surprisingly mild for the style, with a touch of grape reminiscent of wine. As it warms, metallic hops emerge, giving the experience a harsher tone. The bitterness finally overwhelms the sweet, leaving an acrid tone more likely to generate gagging than a desire for more. The first impression was quite good, but ultimately this is little better than other Soviet style strong beers. No thanks.
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!