Cuvee De Tomme (2005) (Black Label)
The Lost Abbey - The Tasting Room

- From:
- The Lost Abbey - The Tasting Room
- California, United States
- Style:
- Wild Ale
- ABV:
- 11.1%
- Score:
- +9 ratings needed
- Avg:
- 4.61 | pDev: 0%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 1
- Status:
- Retired
- Rated:
- Nov 07, 2023
- Added:
- Nov 07, 2023
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 0
Tomme Arthur, head brewer of Pizza Port/Lost Abbey and the namesake of this rare beer, first brewed Cuvee de Tomme in 2000. Categorically, Cuvee is a mosaic of extreme beer styles: a bourbon-barrel aged Belgian-style Quadrupel, fermented with wild yeast and added sour cherries. Though Arthur had been making Cuvee for years prior to the 2005 “Black Label” version, he only packaged it in 2003 and 2004, and even then in very small quantities.
This vintage Cuvee was commissioned by the Michael Jackson Rare Beer Club in 2004, and in order to meet the production level needed Arthur turned to his fellow brewer Vinnie Cilurzo at Russian River for some help. Russian River’s larger capacity allowed Arthur to continue operating his own brewery while allowing Cilurzo’s skilled hands to brew the largest batch of Cuvee de Tomme at that point. Though the “Black Label” recipe is exactly the same as every other batch of Cuvee, the barrels used to age the beer were not. The 2005 vintage displayed more bourbon character due to its aging in first-use bourbon barrels, but this quality has seemed to diminish in recent tastings, leaving more of the chocolate and cherry cordial notes to express themselves.
This vintage Cuvee was commissioned by the Michael Jackson Rare Beer Club in 2004, and in order to meet the production level needed Arthur turned to his fellow brewer Vinnie Cilurzo at Russian River for some help. Russian River’s larger capacity allowed Arthur to continue operating his own brewery while allowing Cilurzo’s skilled hands to brew the largest batch of Cuvee de Tomme at that point. Though the “Black Label” recipe is exactly the same as every other batch of Cuvee, the barrels used to age the beer were not. The 2005 vintage displayed more bourbon character due to its aging in first-use bourbon barrels, but this quality has seemed to diminish in recent tastings, leaving more of the chocolate and cherry cordial notes to express themselves.
Recent ratings and reviews.
Reviewed by edthehead from Maryland
4.61/5 rDev 0%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.75 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.75
4.61/5 rDev 0%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.75 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.75
So good. Murky brown/amber appearance with a surface film of head. Almost 20 years aged at this point, this rendition certainly does still have have a bourbon character to it albeit somewhat diminished, but the age and dusty character added to the quad and cherry notes is really remarkable, not to mention the leather, molasses, and chocolate notes. Really nice.
Nov 07, 2023
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!