Frolic Shipwreck Ale
Mendocino Brewing Company

- From:
- Mendocino Brewing Company
- United States
- Style:
- Scotch Ale / Wee Heavy
- ABV:
- Not listed
- Score:
- +7 ratings needed
- Avg:
- 2.43 | pDev: 5.35%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 2
- Status:
- Retired
- Rated:
- Oct 28, 2012
- Added:
- Nov 28, 2010
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 0
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews.
Reviewed by brokensail from California
2.53/5 rDev +4.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5
2.53/5 rDev +4.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5
Thanks, Bobby, for sharing such a wale. This is one old beer.
A: The pour is an opaque dark amber color with a few tan bubbles cropping up, but it's pretty flat otherwise.
S: A strange nose, but not exactly surprising. I seem to get caramel, prunes, cherries, toffee, cardboard, and fish sauce. It's mostly cardboard, though.
T: The flavor packs a bit more punch, but it's still very oxidized. Caramel, brown sugar, and toffee provide a mild sweetness. Moderate fruit notes, the same as those on the nose. It's a bit watery and perhaps even a touch salty.
M: The body is medium, maybe a bit light, with almost no carbonation.
D: Eh, I don't know what I really expected from a 15 year old (or thereabouts) beer. But, this one is definitely way over the hill (assuming it was ever at the top of one).
Nov 30, 2010A: The pour is an opaque dark amber color with a few tan bubbles cropping up, but it's pretty flat otherwise.
S: A strange nose, but not exactly surprising. I seem to get caramel, prunes, cherries, toffee, cardboard, and fish sauce. It's mostly cardboard, though.
T: The flavor packs a bit more punch, but it's still very oxidized. Caramel, brown sugar, and toffee provide a mild sweetness. Moderate fruit notes, the same as those on the nose. It's a bit watery and perhaps even a touch salty.
M: The body is medium, maybe a bit light, with almost no carbonation.
D: Eh, I don't know what I really expected from a 15 year old (or thereabouts) beer. But, this one is definitely way over the hill (assuming it was ever at the top of one).
Reviewed by largadeer from California
2.5/5 rDev +2.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5
2.5/5 rDev +2.9%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.5
Thanks, Bobby. Supposedly bottled in 1997.
Opaque dark brown with some clarity around the edges. Pours with little head, low carbonation.
Lot of prune and cardboard on the nose. Caramel, too. Pretty light aroma that's dominated by oxidation.
Palate is also very ozidized, though not terrible. A bit of cardboard and prune, some sherry, soy sauce. Body is rather thin at this point. Finishes with dark toasty malt, practically no bitterness. Clearly past its prime, but it's not awful.
Nov 28, 2010Opaque dark brown with some clarity around the edges. Pours with little head, low carbonation.
Lot of prune and cardboard on the nose. Caramel, too. Pretty light aroma that's dominated by oxidation.
Palate is also very ozidized, though not terrible. A bit of cardboard and prune, some sherry, soy sauce. Body is rather thin at this point. Finishes with dark toasty malt, practically no bitterness. Clearly past its prime, but it's not awful.
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!