Cryosphere
Terrapin Beer Company

CryosphereCryosphere
Beer Geek Stats | Print Shelf Talker
From:
Terrapin Beer Company
 
Georgia, United States
Style:
American IPA
ABV:
5.5%
Score:
83
Avg:
3.63 | pDev: 11.02%
Ratings:
42 | reviews: 14
Status:
Retired
Rated:
Apr 17, 2025
Added:
May 29, 2020
Wants:
  1
Gots:
  6
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews. | Log in to view more ratings + sorting options.
 
Rated: 3 by doctorgary from New York

Apr 17, 2025
 
Rated: 3.75 by Winzlow from Florida

Nov 27, 2021
 
Rated: 3.68 by Abe_Froman from Massachusetts

Sep 24, 2021
Photo of Sludgeman
Reviewed by Sludgeman from District of Columbia

3.67/5  rDev +1.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75
From a Terrapin mixed 12 pack. A malt forward IPA. Old school in manny ways, but nothing distinguishing.

T - Bready malt with a herbal and resiny hop flavor.
Sep 05, 2021
 
Rated: 3.9 by BeerMe8 from Florida

Sep 03, 2021
 
Rated: 3.53 by Zylod from West Virginia

Aug 24, 2021
Photo of Nash39
Reviewed by Nash39 from Florida

3.37/5  rDev -7.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5
The pour is yellow. The taste is mild hops, white cracker, slight herbal, & slight lemon note. All in all, it's not as good as I expected it to be because of the well written & alluring advertisement on the box. Cheers! B-
Aug 16, 2021
 
Rated: 3.85 by WJL2112 from Georgia

Jul 26, 2021
 
Rated: 3.3 by BucBasil from Rwanda

Jul 10, 2021
 
Rated: 3.5 by robebo44 from Virginia

Jun 16, 2021
 
Rated: 3.8 by AccipiterofBeer from New York

Jun 13, 2021
 
Rated: 3.5 by PaleAleWalt from New York

Jun 04, 2021
 
Rated: 3.78 by jacobk1997 from Georgia

May 16, 2021
 
Rated: 3.77 by Jonathan-Morgan from Florida

May 09, 2021
 
Rated: 3.69 by Zigzach from Florida

May 04, 2021
Photo of Franziskaner
Reviewed by Franziskaner from Missouri

3.53/5  rDev -2.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.5
Gold to light copper colored with excellent clarity and an inch of tightly and densely packed beige on top. The head quickly dissipated to a fingernail covering the top. The aroma is of earthy hops. I’m tasting earthy hops along with crackery light malt. The mouth is faintly sticky and dry.
Apr 10, 2021
 
Rated: 3.77 by sd123 from Georgia

Mar 28, 2021
Photo of schoolboy
Reviewed by schoolboy from Ohio

3.52/5  rDev -3%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5
I have to say, the first of these I drank was very disappointing. So was the second. This last one (first of the day) is better. I warmed it up a bit, and that helped a lot. I did that with the Recreation Ale from this brewer with the same result.

It pours translucent and yellow. No haze. Also, not a ton of fizz. The aroma is slightly skunky but faint. Not too offensive and enough to feel like a real IPA of some kind. The taste is very clean and balanced and the whole thing sits easily in your mouth - you could drink a bunch of these and not feel overly beer beaten. It's well made, but just too wimpy.

Not recommended. You will probably be disappointed like I was. The Terrapin Survival Kit was not what I had hoped. It looks like their parent company has pushed them to put this out as a mostly lame product.
Mar 14, 2021
Photo of JohnniEMc
Reviewed by JohnniEMc from Pennsylvania

3.62/5  rDev -0.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4
Two 12 oz. cans have been emptied into a clear glass liter mug and bring a surprise. The ale is way beyond pale, it's as translucent as most mass produced lagers. What color is there is a bright and golden amber. There is a little more head, of the white and sticky variety, than one of those other things. Maybe this won't be so bad. Worries again build, as this has no pronounced aroma. It has just enough hoppiness to put it in the ale category by taste. Sorry, but the glass lacing also disappoints. There is some redemption by the taste. Nowhere near the tastefest as a good IPA; nonetheless, this does have some good APA qualities. Even without a bold malt backbone, the body is supple and the lack of a heavy dose of sweetness helps make this work. Without it, the hops do get their chance to entertain the taste buds and they mostly come through. Those hops bring bitterness, in a light-handed way and compensate for the other shortcomings. As a clean and refreshing hop separation concludes, the thought "this really wasn't so bad" crosses the mind.
Feb 19, 2021
Photo of ChainGangGuy
Reviewed by ChainGangGuy from Georgia

3.41/5  rDev -6.1%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5
Appearance: Pours a relatively clear, pale yellow body with a thinnish, wispy, white head.

Smell: A hoppy aroma, though far from the "huge amounts of hop flavor and aroma" purported by the can's info blurb. A blend of citrusy hints with powderized pith and a bit of pepperesque spice. All atop a very modest maltiness akin to waterlogged (sans salt) saltines.

Taste: Fairly subtle, subdued malt profile. A little, light crackery character, that's really it. Citusy, lemon-orange pop with some subdued spiciness and a light tropical backing. Relatively light bitterness. Drying finish with a modest fruitiness and a low level of dankness (which feels weird referring to a low level of dankness as dank -- let's go with dinkness instead) holding through into the aftertaste with a hint of ground aspirin.

Mouthfeel: Medium-light body. Medium carbonation.

Overall: Though not bad, it's not a particularly memorable or noteworthy beer whatsoever. A beer you'll try "new" in a year's time with the same results and likely be surprised you already logged a hohum review.
Jan 22, 2021