White Woods
Cisco Brewers
- From:
- Cisco Brewers
- Massachusetts, United States
- Style:
- Wild Ale
- ABV:
- 5.3%
- Score:
- +5 ratings needed
- Avg:
- 4.44 | pDev: 8.78%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 2
- Status:
- Retired
- Rated:
- Dec 27, 2011
- Added:
- Feb 17, 2011
- Wants:
- 10
- Gots:
- 1
NO SCORE
-
-
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews.
Reviewed by woosterbill from Kentucky
4.05/5 rDev -8.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
4.05/5 rDev -8.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
On-tap at Prime 16 into an Allagash goblet.
A: Bright hazy gold body under a finger of frothy white head; ok retention, light lace. Decent.
S: Fairly straightforward lactic sourness; moderate citrus, faint oak. Solid, but not memorable.
T: Much brighter and fresher than the nose, with tingly tartness up front, followed by huge, juicy citrus (lime and tangerine, then grapefruit toward the tail end), and a bit of oaky vanilla on the finish. Refreshing, complex, and delicious.
M: Medium body with lively effervescence. Nice.
O: Extremely tasty sour, but the aroma just wasn't dynamic enough to make it tremendous overall. I'd love to drink it on a hot summer day, but it isn't my favorite entry in the Woods series.
Cheers!
Nov 24, 2011A: Bright hazy gold body under a finger of frothy white head; ok retention, light lace. Decent.
S: Fairly straightforward lactic sourness; moderate citrus, faint oak. Solid, but not memorable.
T: Much brighter and fresher than the nose, with tingly tartness up front, followed by huge, juicy citrus (lime and tangerine, then grapefruit toward the tail end), and a bit of oaky vanilla on the finish. Refreshing, complex, and delicious.
M: Medium body with lively effervescence. Nice.
O: Extremely tasty sour, but the aroma just wasn't dynamic enough to make it tremendous overall. I'd love to drink it on a hot summer day, but it isn't my favorite entry in the Woods series.
Cheers!
Reviewed by Kkottonmouthkngz from Massachusetts
4.41/5 rDev -0.7%
look: 3 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5
4.41/5 rDev -0.7%
look: 3 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5
A: this is the only spot where im not overly pleased. a light golden color with very minimal head. theres a few chunks of bubbles floating on top but they dont stick around for long. sitting in the glass it just looks fairly average. i can actually see the floor looking through the top, its that see thru.
S: a very nice light funkiness thats quite enjoyable. this one is definitely not overdone.
T: fairly noticable oak presence, the chardonnay barrels did it justice. theres some traces of either nectarine or tangerine on the backend.
M: very low carbonation, which is perfect because it lets the flavors shine particularly well. this is one of the most balanced woods series ive had so far.
D: with the low ABV, i can drink this all night long. it really is delicious and im glad the growler still has 2/3s left in it. hopefully it hits bottles like it was originally supposed to.
Feb 17, 2011S: a very nice light funkiness thats quite enjoyable. this one is definitely not overdone.
T: fairly noticable oak presence, the chardonnay barrels did it justice. theres some traces of either nectarine or tangerine on the backend.
M: very low carbonation, which is perfect because it lets the flavors shine particularly well. this is one of the most balanced woods series ive had so far.
D: with the low ABV, i can drink this all night long. it really is delicious and im glad the growler still has 2/3s left in it. hopefully it hits bottles like it was originally supposed to.
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!