Barley Wine 2013
Helltown Brewing


- From:
- Helltown Brewing
- Pennsylvania, United States
- Style:
- English Barleywine
- ABV:
- 9.5%
- Score:
- 78
- Avg:
- 3.3 | pDev: 21.21%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 11
- Status:
- Retired
- Rated:
- Jun 03, 2016
- Added:
- Apr 25, 2014
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 1
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews. | Log in to view more ratings + sorting options.
Ratings by DaftPatrick:
More User Ratings:
Reviewed by greg4579 from Pennsylvania
2.37/5 rDev -28.2%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2.25
2.37/5 rDev -28.2%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2.25
One of the worst mouthfeels on a beer I have ever experienced. Chalky dry bitterness. Appearance is in line with a highly carbed dopplebock. Really harsh flavors and disjointed.
Jul 08, 2015Rated by Beastcpa from Pennsylvania
4.1/5 rDev +24.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
4.1/5 rDev +24.2%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
Floavirful barleywine that is well worth a try
Feb 11, 2015Reviewed by DoubleSimcoe from Pennsylvania
2.93/5 rDev -11.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2
2.93/5 rDev -11.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2
Unbalanced and disjointed, this feels more like a Belgian Strong Ale than a Barleywine. Excessive carbonation and yeast galore. The taste is tart but not unpleasant, yet this is far from the sweet, malty profile you expect in a barleywine. I don't get much of the maple barrel they say was used, and not much of the oak either.
This brew attacks your palate in a rather unfriendly way. I drank about 1/4 of the bomber and used the rest in a cauliflower soup. A much better use. Would not and will not revisit this.
Feb 02, 2015This brew attacks your palate in a rather unfriendly way. I drank about 1/4 of the bomber and used the rest in a cauliflower soup. A much better use. Would not and will not revisit this.
Reviewed by LordofthePings from Pennsylvania
3.14/5 rDev -4.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3
3.14/5 rDev -4.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3
22oz bottle into a duvel tulip.
A: Hazy, amber, great head retention.
S: A hint of cherry? Yeasty. No maple smell. A little light for the style.
T: Not what I was expecting in a barley wine. A bit harsh with an ethanol background. Some dried fruit qualities but I cannot find the maple.
M: Too carbonated for my taste. Harsh on the tongue.
O: A disappointment for what I was expecting. Drinkable but would not buy this one again. Sorry Helltown Brewery.
Jan 22, 2015A: Hazy, amber, great head retention.
S: A hint of cherry? Yeasty. No maple smell. A little light for the style.
T: Not what I was expecting in a barley wine. A bit harsh with an ethanol background. Some dried fruit qualities but I cannot find the maple.
M: Too carbonated for my taste. Harsh on the tongue.
O: A disappointment for what I was expecting. Drinkable but would not buy this one again. Sorry Helltown Brewery.
Reviewed by DIM from Pennsylvania
3.06/5 rDev -7.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3
3.06/5 rDev -7.3%
look: 3 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3
Aged on oak and maple
This was a hazy peachy copper color after the foam eventually settled. There is a very pleasant maple aroma here, but unfortunately there is also plenty of raw abrasive oakiness and harsh, booze toffee. Taste follows the nose, but it is even more abrasive on the tongue. Lightly sweet raisins, plums, and maple up front; very nice. The harsh, naked woody tingle at the end and the aggressive carbonation are tough to get past.
Overall there are some good elements here, but I wish the wood had been much less prominent. My first from these guys, I'll try more.
Edit: As the carbonation subsided, the harsher elements became much more subdued. The second glass wasn't half bad.
Oct 20, 2014This was a hazy peachy copper color after the foam eventually settled. There is a very pleasant maple aroma here, but unfortunately there is also plenty of raw abrasive oakiness and harsh, booze toffee. Taste follows the nose, but it is even more abrasive on the tongue. Lightly sweet raisins, plums, and maple up front; very nice. The harsh, naked woody tingle at the end and the aggressive carbonation are tough to get past.
Overall there are some good elements here, but I wish the wood had been much less prominent. My first from these guys, I'll try more.
Edit: As the carbonation subsided, the harsher elements became much more subdued. The second glass wasn't half bad.
Reviewed by DrDemento456 from Pennsylvania
3.5/5 rDev +6.1%
3.5/5 rDev +6.1%
Welcome to disappointing town with my 2100 review! Had no idea the low ratings on this or I may not have gotten it. Paid $8.99 for the bomber at my local RT 8 Giant Eagle.
A - Not sure why people are talking about over carbonation mine was carbonated normally but sadly the head fizzes out to nothing within seconds. Never a good sign like a malt liquor. Body is a hazy amber brown with no sediment floaties.
S - Again disappointment all maple or old is faint if you didn't tell me it was brewed with it I would have never guessed. Typical caramel and some cherry notes highlight.
T - Well its not undrinkable with heavy ethanol flavors but its pretty tasteless. Wet cardboard, some oak, and some herbal bitterness herbal and lingers mildly. Sadly it doesn't taste sweet of maple it only inherited the dryness of what maple brings making this beer a chore to drink.
M - Well it's not too light drinking with a medium bodied. It can be chugged so its not as heavy as the style should be.
Overall I am so sad this beer exists but its bound to happen that every great brewery releases a beer that is drinkable but not up to par. Kind of feel ripped off paying that much for the bomber since most of their on tap releases are usually 3-4 dollars.
Oct 11, 2014A - Not sure why people are talking about over carbonation mine was carbonated normally but sadly the head fizzes out to nothing within seconds. Never a good sign like a malt liquor. Body is a hazy amber brown with no sediment floaties.
S - Again disappointment all maple or old is faint if you didn't tell me it was brewed with it I would have never guessed. Typical caramel and some cherry notes highlight.
T - Well its not undrinkable with heavy ethanol flavors but its pretty tasteless. Wet cardboard, some oak, and some herbal bitterness herbal and lingers mildly. Sadly it doesn't taste sweet of maple it only inherited the dryness of what maple brings making this beer a chore to drink.
M - Well it's not too light drinking with a medium bodied. It can be chugged so its not as heavy as the style should be.
Overall I am so sad this beer exists but its bound to happen that every great brewery releases a beer that is drinkable but not up to par. Kind of feel ripped off paying that much for the bomber since most of their on tap releases are usually 3-4 dollars.
Reviewed by troy138 from Pennsylvania
2/5 rDev -39.4%
2/5 rDev -39.4%
As another guy before me said, this is in no way, shape or form a barley wine. This is more of a borderline English Strong Ale if anything. Far from horrible, but even farther from a barley wine. Helltown is a top notch brewery in my eyes. I have never been even close to remotely let down by one of their products, until now. This one misses the mark in every way for a barley wine. Fail.
Sep 27, 2014
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!