Damburger Royal Pils
S. C. Martens S. A.


- From:
- S. C. Martens S. A.
- Romania
- Style:
- Czech / Bohemian Pilsner
- ABV:
- 5.3%
- Score:
- +9 ratings needed
- Avg:
- 2.51 | pDev: 0%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 1
- Status:
- Retired
- Rated:
- Feb 19, 2006
- Added:
- May 21, 2005
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 0
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews.
Reviewed by BuckeyeNation from Iowa
2.51/5 rDev 0%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5
2.51/5 rDev 0%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5
Barely blurry bleached goldenrod with a wealth of fine, uprushing bubbles. The cotton white head looks pretty good. It's lumpy and bumpy and even achieves a rockiness as it falls. The glass coverage is reminiscent of fake snow sprayed on a windowpane; appropriate on this frigid February morning. Absymal head and lace retention knock the appearance score down one notch.
The nose isn't noble hoppy enough. I have certain expectations for pilseners and this one doesn't measure up. Although it doesn't quite smell like a Euro pale lager, it isn't far off. No real off-aromas are a definite plus.
The nose might escape comparisons to an EPL, but the flavor isn't as fortunate. Simply put, Royal Pils doesn't have a high enough hop load. There isn't much of a malt load either. The beer is too light and too weakly flavored to be appealing (at least for those who like a taste bud workout).
The noble hops lack any sort of pungency, any brightness, any verve whatsoever. Simply adding more would help, but I have a feeling that quantity is the only issue here. The beer is neither sweet nor bitter, which, in a strange sort of way, makes it balanced. I was glad to see the metallic flavor of the first few sips fade into oblivion.
The mouthfeel lacks life as well; it's light, even for the style. A shortage of carbonation hurts more than it helps in this case because there's so little mouth interest otherwise.
A Czech pilsener brewed by Romanians. Why am I not surprised that Damburger Royal Pils doesn't shake the very foundations of this honorable style? Stick with the Czechs and the Germans. They have this pilsener thing down to a science. And an art.
Feb 19, 2006The nose isn't noble hoppy enough. I have certain expectations for pilseners and this one doesn't measure up. Although it doesn't quite smell like a Euro pale lager, it isn't far off. No real off-aromas are a definite plus.
The nose might escape comparisons to an EPL, but the flavor isn't as fortunate. Simply put, Royal Pils doesn't have a high enough hop load. There isn't much of a malt load either. The beer is too light and too weakly flavored to be appealing (at least for those who like a taste bud workout).
The noble hops lack any sort of pungency, any brightness, any verve whatsoever. Simply adding more would help, but I have a feeling that quantity is the only issue here. The beer is neither sweet nor bitter, which, in a strange sort of way, makes it balanced. I was glad to see the metallic flavor of the first few sips fade into oblivion.
The mouthfeel lacks life as well; it's light, even for the style. A shortage of carbonation hurts more than it helps in this case because there's so little mouth interest otherwise.
A Czech pilsener brewed by Romanians. Why am I not surprised that Damburger Royal Pils doesn't shake the very foundations of this honorable style? Stick with the Czechs and the Germans. They have this pilsener thing down to a science. And an art.
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!