Zero 2 Sixty
Two Roads Brewing Company
- From:
- Two Roads Brewing Company
- Connecticut, United States
- Style:
- American IPA
Ranked #4,466 - ABV:
- 6%
- Score:
- 83
Ranked #33,796 - Avg:
- 3.64 | pDev: 12.64%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 30
- Status:
- Active
- Rated:
- Jul 16, 2025
- Added:
- Dec 21, 2016
- Wants:
- 2
- Gots:
- 31
SCORE
83
Good
83
Good
Tart IPA
Recent ratings and reviews. | Log in to view more ratings + sorting options.
Reviewed by Sinfull from New York
3.25/5 rDev -10.7%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25
3.25/5 rDev -10.7%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25
Hazy, golden color. One-finger thick, white head. Grapefruits, honey, and malt in aroma. Mild sourness in taste. Moderate bitterness at the end. Feels a bit weird.
Jul 16, 2025
Reviewed by woodychandler from Pennsylvania
1.86/5 rDev -48.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3
1.86/5 rDev -48.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3
Earlier in the day, I revisited their Roadsmary's Baby, this time in a Bottle (GASP!), vice a CAN. I thoroughly enjoyed it & so I wanted to CANtinue with them for a while longer, this time to further The CANQuest (tm).
From the CAN: "Revved Up Flavor!"; "Seasonal Collection"; "Tart IPA"; "Here's to taking the road less traveled, in life and in beer!"; "A natural, harmless sediment may appear".
I heeded that last bit of advice & following the Crack! of the vent, I beCAN a slow, gentle C-Line Glug. I let it run for a bit & then stopped while less than 1/4 of the CANtents were still in the CAN. It foamed up nicely to form just under two fingers of foamy, soapy, rocky, tawny head with limited retention. 8=( Color was a honey-like Amber (SRM = > 7, < 9) with NE-quality clarity. Nose had a wild, lemony funkiness that was nothing like what an AIPA should be. Hey, play with styles all that you want, but understand when you get burnt for not adhering to style, which is how we are to rate & review around here. Mouthfeel was medium. This was tart, all right, puckering & lemony, but how does this relate to its being an AIPA? 8=p Finish was tart & dry, but there was NO way that I felt like I had just been drinking an AIPA! YMMV.
Nov 27, 2019From the CAN: "Revved Up Flavor!"; "Seasonal Collection"; "Tart IPA"; "Here's to taking the road less traveled, in life and in beer!"; "A natural, harmless sediment may appear".
I heeded that last bit of advice & following the Crack! of the vent, I beCAN a slow, gentle C-Line Glug. I let it run for a bit & then stopped while less than 1/4 of the CANtents were still in the CAN. It foamed up nicely to form just under two fingers of foamy, soapy, rocky, tawny head with limited retention. 8=( Color was a honey-like Amber (SRM = > 7, < 9) with NE-quality clarity. Nose had a wild, lemony funkiness that was nothing like what an AIPA should be. Hey, play with styles all that you want, but understand when you get burnt for not adhering to style, which is how we are to rate & review around here. Mouthfeel was medium. This was tart, all right, puckering & lemony, but how does this relate to its being an AIPA? 8=p Finish was tart & dry, but there was NO way that I felt like I had just been drinking an AIPA! YMMV.
Reviewed by izraelc from New York
3.36/5 rDev -7.7%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5
3.36/5 rDev -7.7%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5
Not bad. I was expecting a bigger beer but it's quite mild. Nice medium gold pour. Soft frothy head. It has a nice sour flavor. Not really tart. Slight hop finish. Goes down smooth. I think i drank that a little to quickly.
Jul 15, 2018
Rated by KevinSirWilliamGus from Rhode Island
3.17/5 rDev -12.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25
3.17/5 rDev -12.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25
first tart beer. average. would not try again
May 10, 2018
Rated by Crow0 from New York
3.79/5 rDev +4.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75
3.79/5 rDev +4.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75
Excellent twist on a solid underlying IPA
Apr 08, 2018
Reviewed by jfmorey from Virginia
4.51/5 rDev +23.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 5 | feel: 4 | overall: 5
4.51/5 rDev +23.9%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 5 | feel: 4 | overall: 5
Sours often occupy an extreme position in beer choices, but few have the balance to place themselves within the mainstream. Zero 2 Sky may have achieved this.
Mar 24, 2018
Reviewed by stevoj from Idaho
2.74/5 rDev -24.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.75
2.74/5 rDev -24.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.75
Bottle from Wegmans. Medium golden, hazy, small ring of white head. Aroma is mostly a no-show. Some hops, some tartness. Taste is mildly sour. Listed on label as a Tart IPa, and entered here as a sour. I can see the confusion, I’m not sure what the intent was here, but it really misses on all marks.As a sour its not that good, as an IPA its not that good.
Mar 23, 2018Reviewed by PatrickCT from Connecticut
3.2/5 rDev -12.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25
3.2/5 rDev -12.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25
Brillant orange/copper body. No real head to speak of pulled of the tap.
A thin aroma of sourness and citrus with faint hints of tropical stone fruit.
Faint juicyness with some tropical fruit, citrus with some sourness that falls short of tart. It also falls short of being even mildly interesting.
The mouth feel is watery. Light body, medium carbonation.
Falls short in every way.
Feb 27, 2018A thin aroma of sourness and citrus with faint hints of tropical stone fruit.
Faint juicyness with some tropical fruit, citrus with some sourness that falls short of tart. It also falls short of being even mildly interesting.
The mouth feel is watery. Light body, medium carbonation.
Falls short in every way.
Reviewed by mike22ne from Massachusetts
3.8/5 rDev +4.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75
3.8/5 rDev +4.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75
Poured from a bottle, dated 1/15/18.
Looks ok, a mostly clear orange amber with some cloudy particulates (though this might be avoided by a more careful pour). A bubbly white head fades to a fine layer.
Smells of tropical fruits, tart lime and grapefruit.
Taste is similar to the smell, tart lime, tropical passionfruit and grapefruit juice. Malt is pretty subdued.
Feels decent. It starts off lightly juicy with the bright fruity tartness, then in the end there's slightly dry musty aspect to the sourness. Definitely multiple layers, and it is a refreshing drinkability that doesn't over-do it.
Overall, pretty good. It's not a super sour beer for sour-beer-people, but it's different enough to be interesting. Looking at previous reviews, I wonder if they've tweaked the recipe between different batches. Worth a try!
Feb 09, 2018Looks ok, a mostly clear orange amber with some cloudy particulates (though this might be avoided by a more careful pour). A bubbly white head fades to a fine layer.
Smells of tropical fruits, tart lime and grapefruit.
Taste is similar to the smell, tart lime, tropical passionfruit and grapefruit juice. Malt is pretty subdued.
Feels decent. It starts off lightly juicy with the bright fruity tartness, then in the end there's slightly dry musty aspect to the sourness. Definitely multiple layers, and it is a refreshing drinkability that doesn't over-do it.
Overall, pretty good. It's not a super sour beer for sour-beer-people, but it's different enough to be interesting. Looking at previous reviews, I wonder if they've tweaked the recipe between different batches. Worth a try!
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!