Ruby Lager
Amos Howard's Brew Pub

- From:
- Amos Howard's Brew Pub
- North Carolina, United States
- Style:
- American Amber / Red Lager
- ABV:
- 3.7%
- Score:
- +3 ratings needed
- Avg:
- 3.01 | pDev: 14.95%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 7
- Status:
- Retired
- Rated:
- Mar 06, 2008
- Added:
- Oct 25, 2004
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 0
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews.
Reviewed by CWiggins from North Carolina
2.98/5 rDev -1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
2.98/5 rDev -1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
I stopped at Olde Hickory for lunch while traveling to Knoxville, Tennessee. Their Ruby lager was my second (and final!) beer during this lunch. I rarely choose lagers, and so I chose this one to challenge myself. It arrived in a normal pint glass; its dark amber body was topped with a lean white head that vanished rather quickly. The smell was unremarkable, but there were some mild hints of spices present. A bright, spicy front was soon followed by a mildly malt body and a lean, bitter finish. Its very clean and smooth texture makes it very accessible for most beer drinkers. Craft beer enthusiasts may not find much here to be excited about, but it's pretty nice for what it is.
Mar 06, 2008Reviewed by Angus703 from North Carolina
2.43/5 rDev -19.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 4
2.43/5 rDev -19.3%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 4
Serving mini-keg
Pours light red, good lacing, nice head.
Smell was ordinary.
Very light beer almost watery
Very very drinkable but not all too exciting to drink.
I wouldn't suggest this beer, but thats not to say its a bad beer, but I want a beer to excite me at least a little, which this one fails to do.
On the lable it says "For the beer drinker who desires more in their beer"
I would desire more in this beer.
Mar 03, 2008Pours light red, good lacing, nice head.
Smell was ordinary.
Very light beer almost watery
Very very drinkable but not all too exciting to drink.
I wouldn't suggest this beer, but thats not to say its a bad beer, but I want a beer to excite me at least a little, which this one fails to do.
On the lable it says "For the beer drinker who desires more in their beer"
I would desire more in this beer.
Reviewed by russpowell from Arkansas
2.43/5 rDev -19.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3
2.43/5 rDev -19.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3
Had this on tap back home in July, based on notes
Poured deep red/ruby with a 1" offwhite head. Minimal head retention & lacing
S: Slight caramel & metallic notes
T: Light fruittyness& not much else, finishes weak & metallic
MF: Thin& under carbonated
Drinks okay, but I remember this beingmuch tastier a few years back, what happened???
Oct 15, 2006Poured deep red/ruby with a 1" offwhite head. Minimal head retention & lacing
S: Slight caramel & metallic notes
T: Light fruittyness& not much else, finishes weak & metallic
MF: Thin& under carbonated
Drinks okay, but I remember this beingmuch tastier a few years back, what happened???
Reviewed by SaCkErZ9 from South Carolina
2.78/5 rDev -7.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3
2.78/5 rDev -7.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 3
Poured from a growler obtained at the brewery. Pours a light red color. Not very deep in color. Looks thin. Nice head is formed and generous lace is on the glass.
Smell was unextraordinary. Hints of cinnamon.
Taste is watered down. Very thin body. Drinkable by probably anyone. I prefer something with a little more substance and body.
Feb 18, 2006Smell was unextraordinary. Hints of cinnamon.
Taste is watered down. Very thin body. Drinkable by probably anyone. I prefer something with a little more substance and body.
Reviewed by Enola from North Carolina
3.48/5 rDev +15.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4
3.48/5 rDev +15.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4
This beer was a deep red color. It left my glass almost completly covered in lacing. The smell was similar to fresh cut wood. The taste was pretty good. Probably not as good as this brewery's Crawdad Red but it was still fair. The mouthfeel revealed only minimal bitterness. I could have had another but time was short.
Dec 04, 2005Reviewed by wcudwight from North Carolina
3.37/5 rDev +12%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4
3.37/5 rDev +12%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 4
Amber color with some haziness. Little head that quickly fled the scene. I think I saw some lace, but then it was gone. No odor what so ever. I'll give it a 3 b/c it didn't smell bad. Taste was good. Sweet, but still had a little beer kick. Was carbonated, but kind of thin and watery. A very drinkable beer. Nothing to go out of the way for, but worthy of a try.
Sep 12, 2005Reviewed by brentk56 from North Carolina
3.58/5 rDev +18.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5
3.58/5 rDev +18.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5
Appearance: Light amber body with little head or lacing
Smell: Not much nose, most of this pub's beers seem to be very closed on the nose
Taste: Pronounced honey flavor, lighter than the amber offerings from many other brewers; balanced with mild hoppiness
Mouthfeel: Medium body and carbonation
Drinkability: Very drinkable; a nice distinctive effort
Oct 25, 2004Smell: Not much nose, most of this pub's beers seem to be very closed on the nose
Taste: Pronounced honey flavor, lighter than the amber offerings from many other brewers; balanced with mild hoppiness
Mouthfeel: Medium body and carbonation
Drinkability: Very drinkable; a nice distinctive effort
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!