Marks & Spencer Organic Scottish Ale
Black Isle Brewery Co Ltd


- From:
- Black Isle Brewery Co Ltd
- Scotland, United Kingdom
- Style:
- Scottish Ale
- ABV:
- 4.5%
- Score:
- +6 ratings needed
- Avg:
- 2.69 | pDev: 17.47%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 3
- Status:
- Retired
- Rated:
- Jul 25, 2016
- Added:
- Oct 17, 2007
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 0
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews.
Reviewed by kmacphail from Scotland
2.03/5 rDev -24.5%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2
2.03/5 rDev -24.5%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2
I must admit, I have to applaud Marks & Spencer for recognising real ale as an indivual drink section. On a recent trip I purchased a few bottles of their new selection of real ales.
The beer poured into a pint glass a mirky amber-gold colour, very poor clarity with an initial head that had a lifespan of 5 seconds.
The aromas the beer produced were no better. The dominant scent of bitter hops combined with rotten fruit mixed in with a cheap, lady's perfume. Very unpleasant indeed.
The taste was again dominated by an initial burst of hops followed by a bitter-sweet floral taste, again with a hint of past-it's-best fruit thrown in for good measure. The best part of the beer was the mouthfeel, it would have been a really good session ale had the taste been nice. A medium bodied ale that let you know it was a real beer, but at the same time not making you feel bloated.
However a beer is not purchased on mouthfeel. I finished the pint and would not order another one again. If this is what the supermarkets are labelling as quality beers then the future will be bleak. I hope that this is changed for a much better tasting beer.
Apr 11, 2008The beer poured into a pint glass a mirky amber-gold colour, very poor clarity with an initial head that had a lifespan of 5 seconds.
The aromas the beer produced were no better. The dominant scent of bitter hops combined with rotten fruit mixed in with a cheap, lady's perfume. Very unpleasant indeed.
The taste was again dominated by an initial burst of hops followed by a bitter-sweet floral taste, again with a hint of past-it's-best fruit thrown in for good measure. The best part of the beer was the mouthfeel, it would have been a really good session ale had the taste been nice. A medium bodied ale that let you know it was a real beer, but at the same time not making you feel bloated.
However a beer is not purchased on mouthfeel. I finished the pint and would not order another one again. If this is what the supermarkets are labelling as quality beers then the future will be bleak. I hope that this is changed for a much better tasting beer.
Reviewed by wl0307 from England
2.49/5 rDev -7.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5
2.49/5 rDev -7.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5
Being one of Marks & Spencers newly released range of bottle-conditioned ales, this contract brew by Black Isle brewery is indeed a very welcoming sign that finally a quality supermarket pays serious attention to micro-breweries and their good stuff conditioned in bottles. The label of this ale specifies that it uses whole flower hops, leaves of Sweet Gale (a traditional Scottish herb), with peat-smoked malts sounds very enticing, innit? BB 02/2008, served cool in a half-pint straight pint glass.
A: pours a slightly murky dark orangey amber hue, coming with a very faint and fast-dissipating bubbly beer head and pretty low carbonation.
S: the smell tells me that the bottle-conditioning attempt is NOT RIGHT the stale sourness as of oxidised pears/apples, and mustiness comes from, I think, the unsettled yeast sediments, despite an unmistakable note of malts. If there is any Sweet Gale, hop, or even peat-iness, Id have to say that escapes my mind completely The smell is a mess, simply put, even at the brink of being a disaster.
T: lightly spritzy-textured upfront due to the awakened yeast sediments, but then the overwhelming stale sourness (exactly like that on the nose) dominates the palate coming pretty thin, too, before a light flow of maltiness provides a bit of sweet pleasure; the finish is hard to describe, showing some hints of fruits, lightly toasted malts, some herbs and herbal bitterness of hops Regarding any trace of peat-smokiness? It still escapes my taste buds.
M&D: despite being pretty light-bodied and rather refreshing on the texture, the state of bottle-conditioning is a No-No, failing to show whats promised on the label via either a sound structure or an evolving order. This is the second M&S bottle-conditioned beer that Ive tried, and even less successful than the first (Cropton Yorkshire Bitter). I agree with the previous reviewer (Greencard) that there must be something inconsistent/experimental with the bottle-conditioning process. M&S and Black Isle had better put things right sooner rather than later, lest the whole benign initiative be thrown into disarray!
Dec 18, 2007A: pours a slightly murky dark orangey amber hue, coming with a very faint and fast-dissipating bubbly beer head and pretty low carbonation.
S: the smell tells me that the bottle-conditioning attempt is NOT RIGHT the stale sourness as of oxidised pears/apples, and mustiness comes from, I think, the unsettled yeast sediments, despite an unmistakable note of malts. If there is any Sweet Gale, hop, or even peat-iness, Id have to say that escapes my mind completely The smell is a mess, simply put, even at the brink of being a disaster.
T: lightly spritzy-textured upfront due to the awakened yeast sediments, but then the overwhelming stale sourness (exactly like that on the nose) dominates the palate coming pretty thin, too, before a light flow of maltiness provides a bit of sweet pleasure; the finish is hard to describe, showing some hints of fruits, lightly toasted malts, some herbs and herbal bitterness of hops Regarding any trace of peat-smokiness? It still escapes my taste buds.
M&D: despite being pretty light-bodied and rather refreshing on the texture, the state of bottle-conditioning is a No-No, failing to show whats promised on the label via either a sound structure or an evolving order. This is the second M&S bottle-conditioned beer that Ive tried, and even less successful than the first (Cropton Yorkshire Bitter). I agree with the previous reviewer (Greencard) that there must be something inconsistent/experimental with the bottle-conditioning process. M&S and Black Isle had better put things right sooner rather than later, lest the whole benign initiative be thrown into disarray!
Reviewed by GreenCard from France
3/5 rDev +11.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3
3/5 rDev +11.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3
This is a preliminary review of this beer. It's part of the new range of bottle conditioned UK beers Marks & Spencer is pushing now. However, I'm wondering if the first run of this beer has a few problems. I've tasted two bottles of it now and both have been slightly off (I think). The first one (L7212; BBE: 01.08) seemed to be too tart, sourish, but otherwise OK. The second one (L7248; BBE: 02.08) is not as tart, but was almost completely flat.
I plan to try another one, maybe in a month or so, to do a real review. It's a promising beer by a great brewery. Nice maltiness with a touch of peat and heathery sweet gale. It reminds me a bit of Heather Ale, which is strange because there aren't actually heather flowers in it.
Oct 17, 2007I plan to try another one, maybe in a month or so, to do a real review. It's a promising beer by a great brewery. Nice maltiness with a touch of peat and heathery sweet gale. It reminds me a bit of Heather Ale, which is strange because there aren't actually heather flowers in it.
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!