Sint Gummarus Tripel
Brouwerij Cornelissen
- From:
- Brouwerij Cornelissen
- Belgium
- Style:
- Tripel
Ranked #426 - ABV:
- 8%
- Score:
- 83
Ranked #60,381 - Avg:
- 3.44 | pDev: 14.24%
- Reviews:
- 5
- Ratings:
- Status:
- Active
- Rated:
- Sep 24, 2022
- Added:
- Dec 27, 2004
- Wants:
- 1
- Gots:
- 3
SCORE
83
Good
83
Good
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews. | Log in to view more ratings + sorting options.
Reviewed by TheBierdimpfe from Canada (QC)
3.77/5 rDev +9.6%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
3.77/5 rDev +9.6%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
Medium: Capped bottle, tulip glass.
Opacity: Slightly veiled.
Color: Gold with moderate activity.
Head: Foamy and soapy 2 finger.
Legs: Okay with potent lacing and a good swirl.
Smell: Apricot/Honey/Light vinous sourness.
Taste: Peach/Clove/Herbal.
Feel: Bready/Spicy/Syrupy.
Body: Medium oily and silky.
Carbonation: Long lasting crisp.
Overall: Very good quality Tripel. Nice warmth while fresh. A bit too much sugars.
Visual 7/10 - Flavors 7/10 - Sensations 8/10 - Balance 7/10 -
Freshness 7/10 - Intensity 7/10 - Complexity 7/10 - Appreciation 7.5/10
Mar 02, 2019Opacity: Slightly veiled.
Color: Gold with moderate activity.
Head: Foamy and soapy 2 finger.
Legs: Okay with potent lacing and a good swirl.
Smell: Apricot/Honey/Light vinous sourness.
Taste: Peach/Clove/Herbal.
Feel: Bready/Spicy/Syrupy.
Body: Medium oily and silky.
Carbonation: Long lasting crisp.
Overall: Very good quality Tripel. Nice warmth while fresh. A bit too much sugars.
Visual 7/10 - Flavors 7/10 - Sensations 8/10 - Balance 7/10 -
Freshness 7/10 - Intensity 7/10 - Complexity 7/10 - Appreciation 7.5/10
Reviewed by benfons from Belgium
3.51/5 rDev +2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
3.51/5 rDev +2%
look: 2.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
A: Clear pale amber colour, almost no head. Very little carbonation.
S: Banana, peach apricot, apple all rather sweet, orange peal
T: the smell is also in the taste, but with more hops and a hint of coffee, overall this isn't to bad. Even though every now and then you get something soapy not overpowering everything else, but bothering never the less
M: A bit thin, under-carbonated, alcohol quite noticeable.
O: Not a bad beer, but I probably wouldn't buy it again.
Dec 07, 2011S: Banana, peach apricot, apple all rather sweet, orange peal
T: the smell is also in the taste, but with more hops and a hint of coffee, overall this isn't to bad. Even though every now and then you get something soapy not overpowering everything else, but bothering never the less
M: A bit thin, under-carbonated, alcohol quite noticeable.
O: Not a bad beer, but I probably wouldn't buy it again.
Reviewed by czfreeman from California
2.26/5 rDev -34.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5
2.26/5 rDev -34.3%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5
In a sampler of beers from the Limburg region of Belgium.
Pours a orange tone, light brown. Full head fills the rest of my Hommel Bier goblet, lots of carbonation.
Smells, well not all like a triple. Much more like a Pils actually.Bitter malt, hop, light yeast, mineral-rich water, light bitter herbalness.Light earthiness in the background. Hint of pepper, spice. Really weak however, lacking the creamy spice, yeast graininess of the best.
Flavor is also a bit strange.Pils-like bitterness, light fruitiness is found after several minutes. Plum, pepper, spice, lots of coriander. Finishing tart and malty.
Honestly this tastes like a Helle's Bock, not a triple at all.Bitter, tart, really unbalanced, lacking every ccritic point for me for a good Triple.
Odd beer, will not drink again
Jun 04, 2011Pours a orange tone, light brown. Full head fills the rest of my Hommel Bier goblet, lots of carbonation.
Smells, well not all like a triple. Much more like a Pils actually.Bitter malt, hop, light yeast, mineral-rich water, light bitter herbalness.Light earthiness in the background. Hint of pepper, spice. Really weak however, lacking the creamy spice, yeast graininess of the best.
Flavor is also a bit strange.Pils-like bitterness, light fruitiness is found after several minutes. Plum, pepper, spice, lots of coriander. Finishing tart and malty.
Honestly this tastes like a Helle's Bock, not a triple at all.Bitter, tart, really unbalanced, lacking every ccritic point for me for a good Triple.
Odd beer, will not drink again
Reviewed by paterlodie from Belgium
3.28/5 rDev -4.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
3.28/5 rDev -4.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
Best before 09-06. Poors in with nice white head theats thick and lasts quiet wel. Later on it forms a beautifull landscape with mountains on top of your perfectly clear bronze colored beer.
Nose is malty and alcoholic and litle oxidised. Lots of fruity and spice yeastarome makes nose quiet pleasant. Taste is strong alcoholic and malty as the noseimpression was but with more oxidation. Mouthfeel is sweet in beginning and bitter in aftertaste. No big enjoyment in there either though. Drinkability is probably quiet good when real fresh but mine was quiet oxidised and not too amusing... why can't they put bottle conditioning on this one!?
Mar 09, 2005Nose is malty and alcoholic and litle oxidised. Lots of fruity and spice yeastarome makes nose quiet pleasant. Taste is strong alcoholic and malty as the noseimpression was but with more oxidation. Mouthfeel is sweet in beginning and bitter in aftertaste. No big enjoyment in there either though. Drinkability is probably quiet good when real fresh but mine was quiet oxidised and not too amusing... why can't they put bottle conditioning on this one!?
Reviewed by Paddez from Belgium
2.67/5 rDev -22.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 2 | feel: 4 | overall: 1.5
2.67/5 rDev -22.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 2 | feel: 4 | overall: 1.5
Pours a slightly hazy, orange brew with a rather small head.
The aroma is slightly sweet with some malts & hops and, suprising enough, roasted nuts, coffee and herbs and spices.
The taste is quite tart and yeasty with some hops, it flows out in a very awkward and strong herbal, spicy (coriander?) earthiness that overpowers every other taste and ruins the complexness otherwise found in this beer. The mouthfeel is good but the beer is not drinkable at all.
Not a classic belgian triple by any means. Very unbalanced and incredibly undrinkable. I barely managed to finish my 33cl. Arguably the worst triple I've ever had. Not recommended unless you're very adventurous.
Dec 27, 2004The aroma is slightly sweet with some malts & hops and, suprising enough, roasted nuts, coffee and herbs and spices.
The taste is quite tart and yeasty with some hops, it flows out in a very awkward and strong herbal, spicy (coriander?) earthiness that overpowers every other taste and ruins the complexness otherwise found in this beer. The mouthfeel is good but the beer is not drinkable at all.
Not a classic belgian triple by any means. Very unbalanced and incredibly undrinkable. I barely managed to finish my 33cl. Arguably the worst triple I've ever had. Not recommended unless you're very adventurous.
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!