St Martin Tripel
Brasserie De Brunehaut


- From:
- Brasserie De Brunehaut
- Belgium
- Style:
- Belgian Tripel
Ranked #283 - ABV:
- 9%
- Score:
- 83
Ranked #32,556 - Avg:
- 3.68 | pDev: 14.67%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 50
- Status:
- Active
- Rated:
- Jan 16, 2025
- Added:
- Feb 12, 2010
- Wants:
- 5
- Gots:
- 13
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews. | Log in to view more ratings + sorting options.
Reviewed by Sinfull from New York
3.68/5 rDev 0%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75
3.68/5 rDev 0%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75
Normal tripel. Hazy yellow color, with big, white, lasting head. Nice aroma of yeast, fruits,and malt. The taste is malty sweet with notes of fruits and a hint of alcohol and spices. Light bitterness in the finish
Jan 16, 2025Reviewed by OlaB from Norway
3.69/5 rDev +0.3%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75
3.69/5 rDev +0.3%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75
L: gives a hazy orange color, decent top of head that disloves rapidly . some lacings on the sides
S: Green apples,citrus,pineapples, peppers and cloves, sugar,floral hops
T&F: Fruity at the start with that typical yeasty sweetness,i sense most of the fruits in the aroma. in the middle i sense more the spices and kind of a sour note in the background.It finishes of dry with a long bittersweet aftertaste.the flavor is the weakest on this beer, since no one of the flavours gets very solid.
Mouthfeel is creamy and boozy and the carbonation is bubbly in the mouth.
O: Overall it was a good and drinkable, but it lacks flavours for being top rated triple.It sure is far more better triples out there. Anyway it was worth trying, and i would like try more from this brewery.
Dec 25, 2016S: Green apples,citrus,pineapples, peppers and cloves, sugar,floral hops
T&F: Fruity at the start with that typical yeasty sweetness,i sense most of the fruits in the aroma. in the middle i sense more the spices and kind of a sour note in the background.It finishes of dry with a long bittersweet aftertaste.the flavor is the weakest on this beer, since no one of the flavours gets very solid.
Mouthfeel is creamy and boozy and the carbonation is bubbly in the mouth.
O: Overall it was a good and drinkable, but it lacks flavours for being top rated triple.It sure is far more better triples out there. Anyway it was worth trying, and i would like try more from this brewery.
Reviewed by constantine_272 from Oregon
3.91/5 rDev +6.3%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75
3.91/5 rDev +6.3%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75
Big fluffy light tan head. Golden colored with a hazy muddiness that looses a couple points. Smells of wheat and bread yeast with a slight honey sweetness. An earthy woody mossy undertone lingers long in the nose. The taste is of biscuit and rye with a tanginess of malt and mild balsamic vinegar. Also some warmth comes through with nutmeg and coriander. An unexpected tingly carbonation finishes the roastiness well. A solid boozy aftertaste persists long with a malt sweetness. Feel is okay. The tingly sensation is good, but doesn't overcome a mouth coating greasy sweetness. The sweetness isn't overpowering, but it's there. The beer is nice and enjoyable, but not the most complex tripel.
Sep 05, 2015
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!