Nut Brown
Postmark Brewing
- From:
- Postmark Brewing
- British Columbia, Canada
- Style:
- English Brown Ale
- ABV:
- 5.1%
- Score:
- +9 ratings needed
- Avg:
- 3.62 | pDev: 0%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 1
- Status:
- Retired
- Rated:
- Dec 22, 2017
- Added:
- Dec 18, 2017
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 0
NO SCORE
-
-
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews.
Reviewed by biboergosum from Canada (AB)
3.62/5 rDev 0%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.5
3.62/5 rDev 0%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.5
650ml bottle - 'Nutty | Rich | Malty'. Well, thanks for the 'unexpected' info, I guess.
This beer pours a clear, bright medium copper amber colour, with one finger of weakly puffy, loosely foamy, and bubbly tan head, which leaves some decent splattered lace around the glass as it quickly wisps away.
It smells of gritty and grainy pale malt, some prominent dry ashiness, stale bar-top nuts, and some tame earthy, leafy, and musty hop bitters. The taste is bready and crackery pale malt, a lesser caramel sweetness, some oily generic nuttiness, a still heady free-range char, ethereal dark orchard fruity notes, and more understated earthy, musty, and herbal hoppiness.
The carbonation is average in its quotidian frothiness, the body a so-so middleweight, and mostly smooth, that wily smoky character perhaps taking things down a notch or so here. It finishes off-dry, the basic malt and basic bitch nutty character (sorry) carrying the wan, lingering day.
Overall - yeah, this indeed has all the qualities proffered in the marketing blurb, but I'm just not feeling it, on a sensory level, that is. Maybe it's the |Smoke| that should have been part of said label, but I don't think that I would really want another one of these in the near future.
Dec 22, 2017This beer pours a clear, bright medium copper amber colour, with one finger of weakly puffy, loosely foamy, and bubbly tan head, which leaves some decent splattered lace around the glass as it quickly wisps away.
It smells of gritty and grainy pale malt, some prominent dry ashiness, stale bar-top nuts, and some tame earthy, leafy, and musty hop bitters. The taste is bready and crackery pale malt, a lesser caramel sweetness, some oily generic nuttiness, a still heady free-range char, ethereal dark orchard fruity notes, and more understated earthy, musty, and herbal hoppiness.
The carbonation is average in its quotidian frothiness, the body a so-so middleweight, and mostly smooth, that wily smoky character perhaps taking things down a notch or so here. It finishes off-dry, the basic malt and basic bitch nutty character (sorry) carrying the wan, lingering day.
Overall - yeah, this indeed has all the qualities proffered in the marketing blurb, but I'm just not feeling it, on a sensory level, that is. Maybe it's the |Smoke| that should have been part of said label, but I don't think that I would really want another one of these in the near future.
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!