Red Rogue
Highgate Brewery Ltd

- From:
- Highgate Brewery Ltd
- England, United Kingdom
- Style:
- English Bitter
- ABV:
- 3.8%
- Score:
- +8 ratings needed
- Avg:
- 2.9 | pDev: 3.45%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 1
- Status:
- Retired
- Rated:
- Jun 06, 2014
- Added:
- Jun 13, 2009
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 0
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews.
Reviewed by wl0307 from England
2.81/5 rDev -3.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5
2.81/5 rDev -3.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5
(Notes of 03/11/2008) Tasted by 1/3 pint at the John Russell Fox, a JDW pub in Andover, during the chain's beer festival; served by a non-sparkler pour.
A: reddish amber in colour, coming with a rimmed head and low carbonation.
S: pear-ish sourness dominates, with very little aroma maybe due to bad cellarmanship, while a light and random touch of nuttiness as of amber malts is subdued in the background; a swirl gives rise to sulphurous notes, and precious little else. Overall, the aroma lacks a focus, but not necessarily because the cask is not fresh.
T: quite fruity at the tip of the tongue (from amber malts and hops), turning slightly winey with a bit more thin-bodied fruitiness; fortunately, in the aftertaste a lengthy wave of bitterness of hops and (faintly) biscuity maltiness make up for the lack of a pronounced flavour profile.
M&D: lightly fizzy, thin-bodied, not at its prime but certainly not off-ish; overall, this ale fails on many fronts, most notably in lack of a supposedly richer aroma (four varieties of hops are used - Cascade, Challenger, Fuggles, and Progress) and proper flavour structure. The beerfest. programme describes this beer as a "Special Festival Brew", kind of shedding lights on the "experimental" characters I've just experienced from this glass.
Jun 13, 2009A: reddish amber in colour, coming with a rimmed head and low carbonation.
S: pear-ish sourness dominates, with very little aroma maybe due to bad cellarmanship, while a light and random touch of nuttiness as of amber malts is subdued in the background; a swirl gives rise to sulphurous notes, and precious little else. Overall, the aroma lacks a focus, but not necessarily because the cask is not fresh.
T: quite fruity at the tip of the tongue (from amber malts and hops), turning slightly winey with a bit more thin-bodied fruitiness; fortunately, in the aftertaste a lengthy wave of bitterness of hops and (faintly) biscuity maltiness make up for the lack of a pronounced flavour profile.
M&D: lightly fizzy, thin-bodied, not at its prime but certainly not off-ish; overall, this ale fails on many fronts, most notably in lack of a supposedly richer aroma (four varieties of hops are used - Cascade, Challenger, Fuggles, and Progress) and proper flavour structure. The beerfest. programme describes this beer as a "Special Festival Brew", kind of shedding lights on the "experimental" characters I've just experienced from this glass.
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!