Make IPA Piney Again
Lupulin Brewing

Make IPA Piney AgainMake IPA Piney Again
Beer Geek Stats | Print Shelf Talker
From:
Lupulin Brewing
 
Minnesota, United States
Style:
American IPA
Ranked #1,852
ABV:
7.2%
Score:
88
Ranked #17,869
Avg:
3.97 | pDev: 8.56%
Ratings:
23 | reviews: 10
Status:
Active
Rated:
Aug 23, 2024
Added:
Jan 10, 2019
Wants:
  0
Gots:
  4
Many people are saying that juicy, hazy IPAs are all the rage. Sad! Fake news! Everyone knows piney IPAs are the greatest IPAs in the history of IPAs. Believe me, the bold, piney hops and rich malt of this beer are tremendous, just tremendous. It's fantastic, everyone agrees….China!
Recent ratings and reviews. | Log in to view more ratings + sorting options.
Photo of Victory_Sabre1973
Reviewed by Victory_Sabre1973 from Minnesota

3.91/5  rDev -1.5%
look: 4.25 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 3.75
From a 16oz can canned on 08/09/24

Well, this is unexpected: this is a murky and hazy dark golden pouring beer. I was expecting a clear pouring beer to be honest. It looks good. There's a nice thick 2 1/2 finger slightly off white head. There's good head retention, and some damn nice lacing on the glass.
The aroma is well, a nice piney aroma. So nice and strong. Slight hint of dankness to this beer. I am just digging the aroma.
Taste - There's a slight citrus and melon hit up front. The citrus is mellow and fades right away. This is replaced with a mellow hit of pine. The pine isn't nearly as strong as the aroma let on. The finish is just a beautiful full on hit f bitterness that just builds and lingers in my throat.
The body is decent and full. Very nice feeling from the bitterness that builds and lingers.
Well, I was hoping for a pine bomb, sadly, it isn't. I love the bitterness, but the pine is totally lacking.
Aug 23, 2024
Photo of defunksta
Reviewed by defunksta from Wisconsin

3.66/5  rDev -7.8%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75
Appearance: Pours a slightly hazy (~40% opaque), light and bright orange color. A strong white head. SRM of 7. (4.25)

Aroma: Moderate aromas of orange, dank grapefruit, tropical melon. Light berry. Resinous and somewhat dank. (3.75)

Flavor: The flavor follows with more resinous orange, tropical melon, berry. Some dank pine underneath the big resinous orange flavor. Finishes heavy. (3.50)

Feel: Medium to heavy bodied. Moderate carbonation. Leans heavy and sweet. Leaves a resinous orange feel on the palate. (3.50)

Compared to Surly's Todd the Axe Man 5/29/21: Pours a slightly lighter color. Milder aromas and simpler flavors. More resinous orange and berry. Less airy pine, but more resinous and bitter.

Overall: So now that I'm drinking this beer well into the Biden Administration, needless to say I'm drinking this one a few months past its prime. Canned on 9/2020, so that would put this one 8 months old. Probably why it drank kind of simple and resinous. Didn't get a whole lot of pine here either. Other reviewers noted that this one had a piney but also hazy notes, that it was a mix between the two. I get mostly resinous orange. Either it was always an AIPA, or it was a dry-hopped NEIPA that has aged a few too many months. I'll give it the benefit of the doubt and assume the latter. Not a terrible IPA, but like The Orange Man, I think it was past it's prime, and not really sure what it was trying to achieve: hazy or piney? (Final Rating: 3.66)
May 29, 2021
 
Rated: 4.19 by Bartleby91 from Wisconsin

Dec 20, 2020
 
Rated: 4.1 by cbcrunch from Wyoming

Oct 24, 2020
 
Rated: 3.33 by NickSMpls from Washington

Oct 17, 2020
Photo of MonDak_Joe1953
Reviewed by MonDak_Joe1953 from Minnesota

4.1/5  rDev +3.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4
16oz can. Stamped on can bottom is canning date of '09/22/20'.
Hazy, cloudy body, with the color of straw. Big two finger white frothy head, which leaves behind extensive coverage of lacing.
Aroma is pine and resin.
Taste is woody resin and pine. From middle to end is bitter. Kind of dry.
A little more than medium mouth feel. Excellent carbonation.
Somewhat of a joke beer, based on the can description, but any confusion would be cleared up if the beer itself was clear, not hazy. Has a decent bite.
Oct 15, 2020
Photo of feloniousmonk
Reviewed by feloniousmonk from Minnesota

4.14/5  rDev +4.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4
So, I like the name of this beer, and the idea behind it. And I don't know if liking a joke like this puts them, or me, on the side of the MAGAs, or against. Can't say for sure, let's just leave it as good joke and hope the beer is as good.

Oh, but it's hazy. Got to be hazy. (Does it?), with a bright golden hue, and a thin ivory head.

In the nose: bursting with citrus and pine. Pow! Pow! Grapefruit, orange, and forest floor. Nice.

In the mouth: Mmm. big and juicy. Intense hop flavors. Dripping with bitter delights. Not a trace of the tropical notes that are all the rage these days, hardly a touch of sweetness. Good old bitter hop attack, plenty of citrus and pine. Medium bodied, long, fruity/hoppy finish. Juiciness continues.

If you look at their description below, it's odd that they seem to be rejecting "hazy, juicy" IPAs by making this "piney" IPA, but nothing of the sort has happened. Tropical hops have been swapped out for piney ones, but it's still hazy and juicy. Nothing's really changed, here. Make IPA clear again! Make IPA bitter again! Make IPA dry again!

I like it, though. It's a good IPA, and you can drink it. It's just not as good as it could be. Not piney enough, come on, you can do it. Go all the way. Do it! For real.
Feb 04, 2020
 
Rated: 4.25 by chrismattlin from Ohio

Jan 18, 2020
 
Rated: 4.1 by Abe_Froman from Massachusetts

Jan 04, 2020
Photo of zeff80
Reviewed by zeff80 from Missouri

4.06/5  rDev +2.3%
look: 4 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
16oz can. Poured out a clear, golden orange color with a small, off-white head of foam. It smelled of pine, citrus and toasted caramel. Sweet caramel taste with a sharp piney bitterness.
Jan 02, 2020
 
Rated: 4.08 by Nunya from Ohio

Jan 01, 2020
Photo of Mindcrime1000
Reviewed by Mindcrime1000 from South Dakota

3.66/5  rDev -7.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 3.75
Poured from a pint can into a nonic glass.

Pours a hazy and nearly cloudy orange/amber with a nearly bone-white two-fingered foamy head that retains well and gives way to nice lacing.

The aromas are not as "classic" or "piney" as expected given the bold statements on the label. The aromas are initially more "juicy" like the brews that the label denigrates, with grapefruit and orange flesh, peel, and yes, juice. The pine and dank notes are sidenotes.

The brew tastes fine, but doesn't live up to its self-proclaimed hype. It straddles the line between classic IPA and NEIPA, with juicy citrus notes threatening to overwhelm most other flavors. Malt forward, and grainy in mid-stream, the promised pine and resin take a backseat.

The brew is nicely balanced, with medium body and a clean finish.

If I was rating to the label and the name, this would be rated even lower. However, I'm rating strictly to style. It's a decent line-straddler that ends up being more of an NEIPA, but it may be the most disappointing brew I've had from Lupulin.
Jan 01, 2020
 
Rated: 4.25 by cmsfish from Minnesota

Dec 29, 2019
 
Rated: 4.08 by bigpoppa67 from Wisconsin

Dec 21, 2019
 
Rated: 4.46 by skrabbenhoft from Wisconsin

Dec 16, 2019
 
Rated: 3.79 by sparx1100 from Minnesota

Feb 06, 2019
Photo of maximum12
Reviewed by maximum12 from Minnesota

2.8/5  rDev -29.5%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2
Pine? I’ve almost forgotten the pleasure of rubbing my tongue against an evergreen. 16 oz. single picked up because, well, I have enough IPAs.

The pour is disappointingly murky; the name implied, nay, stated in glowing implication that this was old school, but it looks like a freshly scrubbed kindergartner; as OJ as OJ can be. About a full minute of sniffing finally nets a bit of pine. Woohoo.

If Make IPA Piney Again were one of my daughters, they’d be in hot water for stretching the truth. Sure, there’s pine, but there’s a lot more sweet bread dough, way too much caramel malt. The bitterness is where this is at, making up for the lack of fir: hard, harsh, bracing. Lush, thick. One & done. Wishing I’d split this with my wife.

Looking for a throwback, I found a beer with severely confused identity & enough malt to be housed on the stout shelf. Not even average, now or in 2010.
Feb 05, 2019
 
Rated: 4 by Hopstout from Minnesota

Jan 26, 2019
Photo of npachl
Rated by npachl from Wisconsin

4.03/5  rDev +1.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4
Less marketing, more pine
Jan 24, 2019
Photo of Czequershuus
Reviewed by Czequershuus from Minnesota

4.17/5  rDev +5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.25
Thos beer pours a hazy orange with a solid head. The is floral upfront, with a touch of resinous pine, and some grapefruit peel. The flavor is rich upfront, with definite pine, cedar, resin, cannabis, and caramel, with a medium bitter finish and grapefruit pith and pine. The mouthfeel is quite full with lush carbonation. Overall this is a fantastic beer - full flavored and full bodied, it is utterly satisfying.
Jan 21, 2019