Lily
Georgetown Brewing Company


- From:
- Georgetown Brewing Company
- Washington, United States
- Style:
- Hazy IPA
Ranked #1,941 - ABV:
- 6.5%
- Score:
- 86
Ranked #26,849 - Avg:
- 3.78 | pDev: 9.26%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 8
- Status:
- Active
- Rated:
- Oct 08, 2025
- Added:
- May 09, 2022
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 0
Malts - 2 Row Pale, Pilsner
Hops - Columbus, Citra, Strata, Idaho 7, Mosaic
Yeast - English Ale Yeast
ABV - 6.5%
Best By - 90 days from packaging
Other - Malted Oats
Hops - Columbus, Citra, Strata, Idaho 7, Mosaic
Yeast - English Ale Yeast
ABV - 6.5%
Best By - 90 days from packaging
Other - Malted Oats
Recent ratings and reviews. | Log in to view more ratings + sorting options.
Ratings by NickThePyro:
Rated by NickThePyro from Washington
4/5 rDev +5.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
May 25, 2022
4/5 rDev +5.8%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
May 25, 2022
More User Ratings:
Reviewed by muchloveforhops3 from Montana
3.87/5 rDev +2.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75
3.87/5 rDev +2.4%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75
From a 6-pack picked up at Safeway in Polson, MT
12oz can poured into a pint glass
P hazy straw/light orange; small white cap; quick recession
N soft-med nose of sweet stone fruit and other indiscernible fruitiness
T stone fruit with lightly sweet and tart notes; light biscuity malt supports; citrus juiciness comes out in the finish; lemon character as it opens up
Mf light-med bodied with a high level of prickly carb (kind of detracts from profile a bit)
O has some good qualities, but was a bit underwhelming for the style/brewery
Review date: 08.07.22
Can date: 07.19.22
Oct 08, 202512oz can poured into a pint glass
P hazy straw/light orange; small white cap; quick recession
N soft-med nose of sweet stone fruit and other indiscernible fruitiness
T stone fruit with lightly sweet and tart notes; light biscuity malt supports; citrus juiciness comes out in the finish; lemon character as it opens up
Mf light-med bodied with a high level of prickly carb (kind of detracts from profile a bit)
O has some good qualities, but was a bit underwhelming for the style/brewery
Review date: 08.07.22
Can date: 07.19.22
Rated by ttoadee from Texas
3.9/5 rDev +3.2%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4
3.9/5 rDev +3.2%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4
RB transfer
Jul 16, 2025Rated by CoasterRider from Washington
3.25/5 rDev -14%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25
3.25/5 rDev -14%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25
I don't recognize the can so must have had on tap somewhere. The name is familiar, but didn't give it a great review.
Mar 01, 2025Reviewed by mactrail from Washington
3.07/5 rDev -18.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.75
3.07/5 rDev -18.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.75
Slightly hazy amber brew with ample foam in the goblet. Pleasant light aroma of peach. Taste is bitter and astringent, added to a modest amount of the usual NEIPA acidity. Seems to be devoid of fruit, and veers toward green herbs and roots. Has quite a mineral taste— like gypsum or too much calcium carbonate. This isn't anything like the usual orange-juice hazy, whatever it is. Quite woody aftertaste and totally unpleasant. From the 12 oz can purchased at Elizabeth Station. Dated 4/22/2024.
May 22, 2024Reviewed by stevoj from Idaho
3.71/5 rDev -1.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75
3.71/5 rDev -1.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75
12oz can at share. Hazy yellow pour, small foamy white head. Aroma and taste bring bready malts and zesty citrus notes finisihing with a crisp bitter bite.
Nov 15, 2022Reviewed by RJLarse from Washington
3.84/5 rDev +1.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75
3.84/5 rDev +1.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75
Poured from a can. Gold color with chill haze and a thin white head. Subdued fruit and pine aroma. Malt forward flavor with mild bitterness. A good English style IPA.
Oct 24, 2022Reviewed by TheBricenator from Oregon
3.71/5 rDev -1.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75
3.71/5 rDev -1.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.75
Look: Turbid and orange with little floaties and my pour yields a huge head that eventually relents, slowly receding and leaving great lacing behind
Aroma: Orange, strawberries, papaya, kiwi, tangerines, wafts of mango, and some sweet bready malt
Taste: Starts off with a bunch of citrus and soon after, berry notes start creeping in with raspberry and strawberry leading the charge. Kiwi and tropical fruit gain steam in the middle and malt stays in the backdrop as citrus and berry return for the close
Mouthfeel: Full, medium-high carbonation, and slightly soft in the finish with a little spritzy note
Overall: I dig it. Another semi-hazy IPA from a brewery I enjoy and respect and definitely much different than their two core IPAs. Lots of berries in the along with kiwi that set it apart from others of its kind and as usual, well-made. Not sure this grabbed me enough to return but worth the try nonetheless
Aug 30, 2022Aroma: Orange, strawberries, papaya, kiwi, tangerines, wafts of mango, and some sweet bready malt
Taste: Starts off with a bunch of citrus and soon after, berry notes start creeping in with raspberry and strawberry leading the charge. Kiwi and tropical fruit gain steam in the middle and malt stays in the backdrop as citrus and berry return for the close
Mouthfeel: Full, medium-high carbonation, and slightly soft in the finish with a little spritzy note
Overall: I dig it. Another semi-hazy IPA from a brewery I enjoy and respect and definitely much different than their two core IPAs. Lots of berries in the along with kiwi that set it apart from others of its kind and as usual, well-made. Not sure this grabbed me enough to return but worth the try nonetheless
Reviewed by flagmantho from Washington
3.94/5 rDev +4.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
3.94/5 rDev +4.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
Poured from 12oz can into a dimpled mug. Canned 7/27/22.
Appearance: medium yellow hue with plenty of haze and a thick finger of pillowy ivory foam atop.
Smell: a little bit of sweet malt along with a zesty, rindey orange peel character. It's nice, but it lacks a juicy dimension, which I would really appreciate.
Taste: a little citrusy, just a little bit dank, and with hints of tropical fruit, the hop flavor is good. Bitterness is moderate; maybe not quite west coast levels, but on the bitter side for a NEIPA. Malt is moderately sweet and stands up well to the bitterness. Overall, it's well-balanced.
Mouthfeel: medium body with a big carbonation and quite a nice creaminess. I like it.
Overall: not bad at all. A little more bitter and zesty than I think of NEIPAs as being, but still a tasty quaff.
Aug 19, 2022Appearance: medium yellow hue with plenty of haze and a thick finger of pillowy ivory foam atop.
Smell: a little bit of sweet malt along with a zesty, rindey orange peel character. It's nice, but it lacks a juicy dimension, which I would really appreciate.
Taste: a little citrusy, just a little bit dank, and with hints of tropical fruit, the hop flavor is good. Bitterness is moderate; maybe not quite west coast levels, but on the bitter side for a NEIPA. Malt is moderately sweet and stands up well to the bitterness. Overall, it's well-balanced.
Mouthfeel: medium body with a big carbonation and quite a nice creaminess. I like it.
Overall: not bad at all. A little more bitter and zesty than I think of NEIPAs as being, but still a tasty quaff.
Reviewed by Scotchboy from Idaho
4.05/5 rDev +7.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.25
4.05/5 rDev +7.1%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4.25
Fresh 12oz offering (canned mid-May) pours hazier than expected; golden, cloudy, with a frothy white head. Strong fruity/floral component leads to impressions of melon and sharp citrus, flowers, grapefruit, Tang, moderate pithy bitterness, smooth and basic malt character; this really screams 'hops' and really 'pops' right now at this freshness/age. Finishes with a mouth-watering desire to continue drinking. A real nice all-around IP that is drinkable and also quite a bit more original and unique than the flurry of haze-bombs out there.
Jun 09, 2022Reviewed by UWDAWG from Washington
4.33/5 rDev +14.6%
look: 4.75 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.75 | overall: 4.25
4.33/5 rDev +14.6%
look: 4.75 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.75 | overall: 4.25
Poured from a 12 ounce can into a tulip glass.
Look- Pale gold, very hazy, no visible particulate, white frothy head, average head retention and lacing.
Smell- Predominately clementine, pithy, honeydew.
Taste- Clementine, pithy, honeydew, pineapple.
Feel- Between medium and full body, slightly below average carbonation, creamy, soft, moderately mouth coating, mild bitterness, pithy, moderately mouth watering finish.
Overall- Nice NEIPA with tropical flavors and bouquet. Great mouth feel and appearance.
Jun 07, 2022Look- Pale gold, very hazy, no visible particulate, white frothy head, average head retention and lacing.
Smell- Predominately clementine, pithy, honeydew.
Taste- Clementine, pithy, honeydew, pineapple.
Feel- Between medium and full body, slightly below average carbonation, creamy, soft, moderately mouth coating, mild bitterness, pithy, moderately mouth watering finish.
Overall- Nice NEIPA with tropical flavors and bouquet. Great mouth feel and appearance.
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!