3rd Floor Tripel
Munkle Brewing Company
- From:
- Munkle Brewing Company
- South Carolina, United States
- Style:
- Belgian Tripel
Ranked #137 - ABV:
- 8.2%
- Score:
- 88
Ranked #21,060 - Avg:
- 3.91 | pDev: 9.72%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 7
- Status:
- Active
- Rated:
- Dec 21, 2025
- Added:
- Jul 31, 2019
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 1
SCORE
88
Very Good
88
Very Good
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews. | Log in to view more ratings + sorting options.
Reviewed by efulwider from South Carolina
4.07/5 rDev +4.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4.25
4.07/5 rDev +4.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4.25
Beautiful color, head, texture, and taste. Poured a finger of foam from the can and kept a nice head for a while. Taste has a lot going on, maybe a little too much, but still very good. A solid full bodied wheat ale with nice complexity. Very nice.
Dec 21, 2025
Reviewed by Troy2026 from South Carolina
3.35/5 rDev -14.3%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25
3.35/5 rDev -14.3%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25
Can, October 2025. Pours light colored ale with one finger head that dissipates into mild lacing when consumed. Limited mouthfeel. Flavor notes initially subdued by the alcohol content, but a balanced mid/aftertaste creates a fine, albeit narrow, resolution.
Oct 26, 2025
Reviewed by jmdrpi from Pennsylvania
3.77/5 rDev -3.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75
3.77/5 rDev -3.6%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75
12 oz can
Pours a medium golden color, clear, with white head. The Belgian yeast phenols are fairly mild, more bready malt. Similar taste, starts a little sweet but finishes more balanced. Medium bodied.
Jul 04, 2024Pours a medium golden color, clear, with white head. The Belgian yeast phenols are fairly mild, more bready malt. Similar taste, starts a little sweet but finishes more balanced. Medium bodied.
Rated by bubseymour from Maryland
4.49/5 rDev +14.8%
look: 4.25 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5
4.49/5 rDev +14.8%
look: 4.25 | smell: 4.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4.5 | overall: 4.5
Nice tripel that is a little dry and hoppy but more drinkable than a typical yeasty Tripel. Enjoyed.
Dec 29, 2023
Reviewed by CarolinaCardinals from North Carolina
3.57/5 rDev -8.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5
3.57/5 rDev -8.7%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5
Picked up a single from TW-Greenville, SC 5-7-22 for $3.29. Canned 12-8-21; consumed 7-7-22.
Beer poured golden with a nice white head with the original pour.
Nose is yeasty with a touch of apple and pear.
Taste is a pilsner malt base with a touch of banana phenols which was not expected and overripe pear esters. Finishes on the sweet side with a trace of alcohol by-product.
Mouthfeel is medium to heavy bodied and smooth.
Overall definitely not a drain pour but the beer misses some of the classic marks i look for in the style.
Jul 07, 2022Beer poured golden with a nice white head with the original pour.
Nose is yeasty with a touch of apple and pear.
Taste is a pilsner malt base with a touch of banana phenols which was not expected and overripe pear esters. Finishes on the sweet side with a trace of alcohol by-product.
Mouthfeel is medium to heavy bodied and smooth.
Overall definitely not a drain pour but the beer misses some of the classic marks i look for in the style.
Reviewed by Cm55
4.15/5 rDev +6.1%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
4.15/5 rDev +6.1%
look: 3.75 | smell: 4.25 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
L-minimally cloudy golden color with a faint head
S-there are some floral notes and the Belgian esters that are expected for the style. Hits the mark
T-lots of things going on in this taste, none bad but probably one more than would be ideal. There are definitely Belgian yeast flavors though with more mild fruits (banana?) than the aroma, some mild malt flavors, and a spicy aftertaste.
F-smooth and light, more refreshing than typical for style
O-this is a surprisingly successful beer for the style for a small brewery. I’d absolutely buy another 6pack. You’re not going to confuse it for a mainstream Belgian, but if you like style and see this beer it’s worth a try
Jul 04, 2022S-there are some floral notes and the Belgian esters that are expected for the style. Hits the mark
T-lots of things going on in this taste, none bad but probably one more than would be ideal. There are definitely Belgian yeast flavors though with more mild fruits (banana?) than the aroma, some mild malt flavors, and a spicy aftertaste.
F-smooth and light, more refreshing than typical for style
O-this is a surprisingly successful beer for the style for a small brewery. I’d absolutely buy another 6pack. You’re not going to confuse it for a mainstream Belgian, but if you like style and see this beer it’s worth a try
Reviewed by chinchill from South Carolina
3.92/5 rDev +0.3%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4
3.92/5 rDev +0.3%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4
12 oz can with a 27 May 2020 canning date stamp on the bottom, served in a lager glass.
Pours with a lightly hazy amber colored body topped by a minimal. The appearance looks undercarbonated. The mouthfeel confirms loose carbonation but this fits with the smooth, medium body.
The flavor is true to style with moderate bitterness and a complex, lightly yeasty flavor featuring soft, ripe fruit notes.
Jul 21, 2020Pours with a lightly hazy amber colored body topped by a minimal. The appearance looks undercarbonated. The mouthfeel confirms loose carbonation but this fits with the smooth, medium body.
The flavor is true to style with moderate bitterness and a complex, lightly yeasty flavor featuring soft, ripe fruit notes.
Reviewed by avalon07 from South Carolina
3.83/5 rDev -2%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 3.75
3.83/5 rDev -2%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 3.75
L: Poured from a crowler to a goblet. Had a bright, golden yellow color and a mostly clear consistency. There was a quarter inch of foamy, somewhat long-lasting head. Sparse lacing, though.
S: A good, but not spectacular, aroma of malt, dark fruit, spices, Belgian yeast, and some light fruit.
T: Tasted of a moderate amount of Belgian-style yeast (present throughout), a bit of malt (mostly in the finish), a tinge of melon (fleetingly), a good shot of dark fruit (figs, in particular, with raisins), and a little bit of pepper as well. This is a solid flavor, but not as sharp as others of the style. Still, it's oddly enjoyable.
F: A well-carbonated beer with a lively finish. Medium-bodied.
O: An uneven beer, but oddly likable. Worth a look.
Jul 31, 2019S: A good, but not spectacular, aroma of malt, dark fruit, spices, Belgian yeast, and some light fruit.
T: Tasted of a moderate amount of Belgian-style yeast (present throughout), a bit of malt (mostly in the finish), a tinge of melon (fleetingly), a good shot of dark fruit (figs, in particular, with raisins), and a little bit of pepper as well. This is a solid flavor, but not as sharp as others of the style. Still, it's oddly enjoyable.
F: A well-carbonated beer with a lively finish. Medium-bodied.
O: An uneven beer, but oddly likable. Worth a look.
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!