Golden Eel
Twin Sisters Brewing
- From:
- Twin Sisters Brewing
- Washington, United States
- Style:
- American IPA
- ABV:
- 5.7%
- Score:
- +6 ratings needed
- Avg:
- 3.43 | pDev: 10.5%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 2
- Status:
- Retired
- Rated:
- Oct 27, 2020
- Added:
- May 25, 2019
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 0
NO SCORE
-
-
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews.
Reviewed by mactrail from Washington
3.54/5 rDev +3.2%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5
3.54/5 rDev +3.2%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5
Clear golden brew with admirable piles of foam in the Maredsous goblet. Aroma is light, with whiffs of melon, alfalfa, and lime. Less sweet than a lot of current IPAs. It tastes like fresh hops with straw. Actually it doesn't taste like much, but it could pass for a Brut IPA with the dry fizzy mouthfeel. I have to say it's better than a lot of Bruts if you think of it that way. Resiny finish but moderate bitterness. The aromatics fall short, but it's quite drinkable. From the six-pack of 12 oz cans.
Jun 17, 2019
Reviewed by BBThunderbolt from Kiribati
2.88/5 rDev -16%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75
2.88/5 rDev -16%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.75
12oz can poured into 14oz teku. Poured a lightly hazy medium-dark gold color with about 3/4 inch of white head that had low retention and lacing.
The aroma was fairly neutral, a touch of malt showing through with some citrus and floral hops on top.
Same on the tongue, at first. But, at the back of the palate, there was a harshness that wasn't just hop bitterness.
The body was fairly typical for the style, medium-light, with a dry finish.
Drinkability was OK, except for that harshness on the very back of the palate. It didn't fade over the course of the glass, and made finishing the can a bit of a chore.
Overall, mostly an average beer, with one bad attribute. Decide for yourself, or don't. Wutevz.
May 25, 2019The aroma was fairly neutral, a touch of malt showing through with some citrus and floral hops on top.
Same on the tongue, at first. But, at the back of the palate, there was a harshness that wasn't just hop bitterness.
The body was fairly typical for the style, medium-light, with a dry finish.
Drinkability was OK, except for that harshness on the very back of the palate. It didn't fade over the course of the glass, and made finishing the can a bit of a chore.
Overall, mostly an average beer, with one bad attribute. Decide for yourself, or don't. Wutevz.
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!