Iron Jack Full Strength Lager
Legendary Brewing Co

- From:
- Legendary Brewing Co
- Australia
- Style:
- American Adjunct Lager
- ABV:
- 4.2%
- Score:
- +7 ratings needed
- Avg:
- 2.06 | pDev: 6.8%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 1
- Status:
- Inactive
- Rated:
- Jul 10, 2019
- Added:
- Jul 26, 2018
- Wants:
- 1
- Gots:
- 0
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews.
Reviewed by doktorhops from Australia
1.94/5 rDev -5.8%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2
1.94/5 rDev -5.8%
look: 3 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2
Well well well, it’s been a while since I’ve reviewed one of these: a Macro Lager. *cracks knuckles* So here’s the disclaimer: I got this beer free from the Lion-Nathan rep, who’s actually a pretty top-bloke who knows that I probably wont like this beer. He literally said “You will not like this beer”. I like a rep who knows their market. I am, in fairness, probably going to rip into this beer and end on a rant, however I am always open to being proven wrong and I like to give every beer a chance. First up off the bat: calling a 4.2% ABV beer “Full Strength” is a bit rich when >4.5% ABV is considered full-strength in my book. Also this is brewed out of the Castlemaine Brewery in Brisbane, so don’t expect much more than a XXXX Bitter clone.
Poured from a 330ml bottle into a US shaker pint (my least favourite glass).
A: Clear golden body with a white cappuccino foam head that settles to a thin blanket, minimal lacing [told ya I would copy pasta]. Only difference between this and the last brew (Fonzie Abbott House Beer) is the lack of carbonation action going on inside this glass, looks flat as a tack. 6/10.
S: There’s a reason most blue-collar Aussie drinkers don’t lean in and sniff their glass of VB/Toohey’s/XXXX/MB/Etc, Macro Lager – they smell pretty terrible, like a night at the local country town RSL, there’s nothing but an odd mixture of adjunct grains, crisp apple hints and a chemical note. Not great stuff, certainly not an aroma that warrants a tasting. 3/10.
T: If you hold your nostrils closed and take a swig it’s not so bad… at first. There’s an overall grainy/crisp apple flavour that lasts from start to finish, it’s not exciting – the rep was right, but it does the job of quenching ones thirst with little muss/fuss. Then the aftertaste comes in and some of that solvent-like chemical character comes through – proving that brewing, even though it is a science (Zymology: Google it), there is an art-form about it that the bigger macro brewers don’t get. 4/10.
M: Thin, watery, and strangely cloying with a grainy slickness on the tongue. 4/10.
D: Whilst this isn’t the worst Macro Lager I’ve tried (I’m looking at you VB!) there is little to redeem it or make it stand out from the pack – which is IMO the problem with inventing new Macro Lagers: every man and his dog in the outback wearing flannel already has a favourite Macro Lager, and they’re all set in stone about it (even though they all taste pretty much the same), so this is a big risk for Lion-Nathan when they should be chasing craft money instead. 4/10.
Food match: 1st: Tip this down the drain, 2nd: Get a real beer, 3rd: Add food.
Jul 26, 2018Poured from a 330ml bottle into a US shaker pint (my least favourite glass).
A: Clear golden body with a white cappuccino foam head that settles to a thin blanket, minimal lacing [told ya I would copy pasta]. Only difference between this and the last brew (Fonzie Abbott House Beer) is the lack of carbonation action going on inside this glass, looks flat as a tack. 6/10.
S: There’s a reason most blue-collar Aussie drinkers don’t lean in and sniff their glass of VB/Toohey’s/XXXX/MB/Etc, Macro Lager – they smell pretty terrible, like a night at the local country town RSL, there’s nothing but an odd mixture of adjunct grains, crisp apple hints and a chemical note. Not great stuff, certainly not an aroma that warrants a tasting. 3/10.
T: If you hold your nostrils closed and take a swig it’s not so bad… at first. There’s an overall grainy/crisp apple flavour that lasts from start to finish, it’s not exciting – the rep was right, but it does the job of quenching ones thirst with little muss/fuss. Then the aftertaste comes in and some of that solvent-like chemical character comes through – proving that brewing, even though it is a science (Zymology: Google it), there is an art-form about it that the bigger macro brewers don’t get. 4/10.
M: Thin, watery, and strangely cloying with a grainy slickness on the tongue. 4/10.
D: Whilst this isn’t the worst Macro Lager I’ve tried (I’m looking at you VB!) there is little to redeem it or make it stand out from the pack – which is IMO the problem with inventing new Macro Lagers: every man and his dog in the outback wearing flannel already has a favourite Macro Lager, and they’re all set in stone about it (even though they all taste pretty much the same), so this is a big risk for Lion-Nathan when they should be chasing craft money instead. 4/10.
Food match: 1st: Tip this down the drain, 2nd: Get a real beer, 3rd: Add food.
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!