Alberta's Best
Groupe Geloso
- From:
- Groupe Geloso
- Quebec, Canada
- Style:
- American Adjunct Lager
- ABV:
- 4.9%
- Score:
- +4 ratings needed
- Avg:
- 2.24 | pDev: 30.8%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 2
- Status:
- Inactive
- Rated:
- May 22, 2016
- Added:
- Jun 26, 2006
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 0
NO SCORE
-
-
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews.
Reviewed by Derek from Canada (BC)
3.25/5 rDev +45.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4.5
3.25/5 rDev +45.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 4.5
A: Crystal clear, slightly yellow; pours with some nice white head; no retention or lace.
S: Faint aroma of fresh floral/earthy hops. Relatively pleasant for a macro lager.
T: Not a lot of flavour. Slightly sweet, but with a crisp, dry finish. Seems to have a little more bitterness than your average macro lager. Not much hop flavour, but the slight floral taste is nice... it certainly isn't repulsive like some! A hint of buttery diacetyl.
M: VERY light body, moderate carbonation.
D: Although I personally don't find it overly enticing, it is like water!
Thanks Len!
Jul 01, 2006S: Faint aroma of fresh floral/earthy hops. Relatively pleasant for a macro lager.
T: Not a lot of flavour. Slightly sweet, but with a crisp, dry finish. Seems to have a little more bitterness than your average macro lager. Not much hop flavour, but the slight floral taste is nice... it certainly isn't repulsive like some! A hint of buttery diacetyl.
M: VERY light body, moderate carbonation.
D: Although I personally don't find it overly enticing, it is like water!
Thanks Len!
Reviewed by Frozensoul327 from Michigan
2.58/5 rDev +15.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5
2.58/5 rDev +15.2%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5
Pours out to the a-typical macro color: yellowish gold, with a small head of white foam that had some staying power and held to the mid-point of the glass. Medium level of carbonation. Aromas of malt and hops, with adjuct rice and grain were present. Taste is fair; malt, grain, adjucnt, water, weak note of hops. Mouthfeel is like water, with a slightly sour aftertaste. Drinkability is fair at best. Seriously, I know Alberta has better, so change the name. Perhaps, Alberta's Average?
THE BLOODHOUND FACTOR: Benji immediately could tell by the aroma that this was a sub-par offering, but Peaches lapped some up, and was quickly clued in to the beer's shortcomings. Bloodhounds rule.
Jun 26, 2006THE BLOODHOUND FACTOR: Benji immediately could tell by the aroma that this was a sub-par offering, but Peaches lapped some up, and was quickly clued in to the beer's shortcomings. Bloodhounds rule.
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!