Kül Light
Kül Brewing

Kül LightKül Light
Beer Geek Stats | Print Shelf Talker
From:
Kül Brewing
 
Wisconsin, United States
Style:
Light Lager
ABV:
4%
Score:
66
Avg:
2.22 | pDev: 29.28%
Ratings:
18 | reviews: 8
Status:
Retired
Rated:
May 31, 2019
Added:
Oct 31, 2002
Wants:
  0
Gots:
  3
No description / notes.
View: More Beers
Recent ratings and reviews. | Log in to view more ratings + sorting options.
Photo of hoptheology
Reviewed by hoptheology from South Dakota

2.31/5  rDev +4.1%
look: 4.25 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.25
12 oz can from 4 pack at Woodman's ($1.08/4 pack) poured into Zildjian Constantinople glass.

Pale hazy gold with a tall cap of 3 fingers leaving nice sparse lacing as it recedes to 1/2 finger.

Aroma of stovetop corn, urine, and cereal; heavy dry grassiness; faint applepear; slight nectarine.

Flavor is made up of plant matter and water. Ever so slight nectarine. Very faint apple, but dropped in dew grass; stale grain and Christmas tree water. It's like taking a sip of hydroponic water.

Feel is crisp and empty. Nothing. Slight starch on the finish.

Overall, a lower than average light lager. They're not easy to brew properly, but this one is particularly shabby of note. The positive spin on this is that you can essentially get drunk for nothing if you're in Milwaukee and find yourself in a cardboard box with a shaggy dog.
May 31, 2019
Photo of vette2006c5r
Reviewed by vette2006c5r from Minnesota

1.73/5  rDev -22.1%
look: 2 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 1.5
Kul Light pours a fizzy pale color, with a big, but quickly dissipating head. Aroma smells like boiling corn; very grainy. Flavor is very grainy, and tastes like drinking the water in which you boiled sweet corn in. Packs a stronger punch for this style. Overall, its a stronger light beer, and really highlights the corn adjuncts.
Oct 01, 2018
 
Rated: 2.16 by Foxman27 from Iowa

Feb 21, 2018
 
Rated: 1.93 by Krusader from Wisconsin

Oct 13, 2017
Photo of Ferretferret
Reviewed by Ferretferret from Wisconsin

3.12/5  rDev +40.5%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25
Surprisingly solid, and deserving of its intense marketing blitz (one I believe to be only local). This is among the most flavorless of beers, clearly targeting customers who would normally purchase Natural Light, Miller Light, Bud Light, et cetera. I'd find this beer far preferable to those, and would compare it slightly favorable to PBR, another decent adjunct.
Apr 25, 2017
Photo of Schlitz74
Reviewed by Schlitz74 from Illinois

1.13/5  rDev -49.1%
look: 1.25 | smell: 1.25 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1.25
You get what you pay for, the head looked ok while it lasted, fizzy tasting and not much in the way taste, just blah. There is no lacing. Worst light beer I have tried,.
Mar 13, 2017
 
Rated: 3.52 by McHenry from Wisconsin

Nov 12, 2016
Photo of dhannes
Reviewed by dhannes from Wisconsin

3.29/5  rDev +48.2%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 3.25
Poured at room temperature into a Perfect Pint.
L=The point-of-purchase showed a darker than average hue for a light lager, and this almost reached it--very thin head.
S=Somewhat prominant malted barley with hints of citrus.
T=Typical corn syrup sweetness with some citrus...not overpowering and better than many other "light" lagers.
F=Excessive carbonation, coupled with the sweetness, makes it refreshing and sessionable...would be a decent lawnmower beer.
O=At $1.19 for a 4-pack, I had to try it and it just exceeded my low expectations. I probably would not buy again, but I will finish the 4-pack with ease.
Oct 04, 2016
 
Rated: 1.87 by Fargrow from Michigan

Oct 07, 2015
 
Rated: 2.29 by TheBeer from Wisconsin

Mar 02, 2015
 
Rated: 1.88 by bigpoppa67 from Wisconsin

Feb 08, 2015
 
Rated: 1.52 by MaxOhle from Illinois

Nov 02, 2014
 
Rated: 2 by Localdrinklax from Wisconsin

Sep 11, 2013
 
Rated: 2.75 by matjack85 from Illinois

Feb 11, 2013
 
Rated: 3 by gio540 from Wisconsin

Dec 02, 2011
Photo of hu5om
Reviewed by hu5om from Wisconsin

2.13/5  rDev -4.1%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2.5
can into a delirium tulip, obviously
a-pale yellow corn, poured a finger of white foam taht dissipates very quickly, crystal clear head
s-crisp, light, not much really to speak of. smells like okay cheap beer. bam
t-well, it's light. for some reason, i can barely describe these cheap lagers. just tastes like college and poverty. hops and malts are essentially absent
m-light, watery and thin. my tongue isn't sure if i actually drank anything. check back later. finish is clean, but why do i feel so dirty?
d-if you have a beer pong tournament and busch would break the bank, i wouldn't rule out kul. made to chug. don't let it warm up. i would not use the term savor with this beer. oh well, could have been a minhas.
Jul 23, 2010
Photo of Dogbrick
Reviewed by Dogbrick from Ohio

1.5/5  rDev -32.4%
look: 1.5 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 1.5
Bottle brought back from Vinny’s at the La Crosse airport. Pale yellow-gold color with lots of bubbles and a thin white head. Nil lacing. Aroma of sweetcorn and stale hops. Light-bodied and relatively flavorless aside from mild corn and wheat. The finish is carbonated and lacks any flavor as well. Disappointing.
Nov 07, 2005
Photo of ZAP
Reviewed by ZAP from Minnesota

1.8/5  rDev -18.9%
look: 2 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1 | overall: 1.5
I hit the 50-cents close out cart the other day....This is from a clear bottle and tastes slightly skunked....the moutfeel is fizzy, and thin....it smells like skunked adjucts...the taste is hardly there...I've seriously had some N.A.'s similar in taste to this...some better actually....still it is beer (barely) and if this was the only beer on earth I'd drink it....since it isn't I won't be trying it again...
Oct 31, 2002