Eumundi Lager
Castlemaine Perkins
- From:
- Castlemaine Perkins
- Australia
- Style:
- American Adjunct Lager
- ABV:
- Not listed
- Score:
- +6 ratings needed
- Avg:
- 1.98 | pDev: 33.84%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 3
- Status:
- Retired
- Rated:
- Dec 28, 2007
- Added:
- May 21, 2002
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 0
NO SCORE
-
-
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews.
Reviewed by jarmby1711 from Australia
2.73/5 rDev +37.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5
2.73/5 rDev +37.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5
Whenever one gets to try a regional offering ones hopes tend to rise.
However beer drinking is a slow learning rocess and a reality check would have and should have told me to lower expectations.
Average Aussie lager , however nothing particularly characteristic about it.(other than being from Eumundi)
Dec 28, 2007However beer drinking is a slow learning rocess and a reality check would have and should have told me to lower expectations.
Average Aussie lager , however nothing particularly characteristic about it.(other than being from Eumundi)
Reviewed by vancurly from Australia
2.43/5 rDev +22.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5
2.43/5 rDev +22.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5
a: Rocky white head that sinks quickly. Pale amber, not much effervescence.
s: Typical PoR metal & sulfur
f: Archetypal Aussie macro.... maybe a touch better than the standard macros. Flavours of PoR again, slight tropical fruitiness. Simple malt profile
m: Crisp bitterness. Fairly light, simply summer quaffer.
d: Better than XXXX, VB, New, but not as good as the next tier (Cascade Premium, Hahn Premium). On a par with Crown.
Sep 16, 2007s: Typical PoR metal & sulfur
f: Archetypal Aussie macro.... maybe a touch better than the standard macros. Flavours of PoR again, slight tropical fruitiness. Simple malt profile
m: Crisp bitterness. Fairly light, simply summer quaffer.
d: Better than XXXX, VB, New, but not as good as the next tier (Cascade Premium, Hahn Premium). On a par with Crown.
Reviewed by Kulrak from Australia
1.75/5 rDev -11.6%
look: 4 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1.5
1.75/5 rDev -11.6%
look: 4 | smell: 1.5 | taste: 1.5 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1.5
Pours a slightly coppery light gold color with head that stood up about 5mm above the rim of the glass. Smells sort of perfumy, and a little yeasty. Not a real pleasant smell. The taste is just as pleasant as the smell. Sort of chemically sweet, and a coppery aftertaste. Mouthfeel isn't too bad, it's very heavy, with a slight harshness. All in all, not a great offering. I won't bother with this again, there's plenty of decent beers in the same price range.
Oct 26, 2006
Rated by rastaman from England
1/5 rDev -49.5%
look: 1 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1
1/5 rDev -49.5%
look: 1 | smell: 1 | taste: 1 | feel: 1 | overall: 1
Horrible chemical mess, very very bland and boring, proof that good beer doesn't come from Queensland, totally horrid.
May 21, 2002
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!