Schalchner Weisse Hell
Weissbierbrauerei Schwendl

- From:
- Weissbierbrauerei Schwendl
- Germany
- Style:
- Hefeweizen
- ABV:
- 5.2%
- Score:
- +6 ratings needed
- Avg:
- 3.55 | pDev: 8.73%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 1
- Status:
- Active
- Rated:
- Mar 27, 2022
- Added:
- Apr 05, 2016
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 0
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews.
Reviewed by Jugs_McGhee from Texas
3.14/5 rDev -11.5%
look: 2.75 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25
3.14/5 rDev -11.5%
look: 2.75 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25
BOTTLE: 500ml format. Brown glass. Branded pry-off crown cap. Yellow-dominant neck and body labels. Best before: 07.07.16. Purchased at Getranke Oase in Munich.
Served chilled into a weizenglas. Expectations are average; I believe this is my first beer from this brewery. Reviewed live as a hefeweizen (hefeweizen bright) per the label.
HEAD: Frothy, foamy, soft-looking, and healthy, lasting a good ~10 minutes. Occupies ~60% of the glass - pretty impressive. Some messy lacing clings to the sides of the glass as it recedes.
BODY: Cloudy rather than turbid or hazy, redolent more of a witbier than a hefeweizen. The lemon yellow coloration echoes that impression. Bright but not vibrant.
Looks pretty typical of the hefeweizen style, without suggesting a great expression thereof. I notice no unique or special characteristics.
AROMA: Dry wheat dominates. Clean malted barley. A hint of lemon peel. I'm not picking up on any banana, bubblegum, or orange peel. The yeast offers only some tame biscuity character and a hint of clove. The wheat and barley malts don't come off particularly fresh or vivid.
Aromatic intensity is average. Suggests an average quality hefeweizen.
TASTE: Poorly balanced, with a subpar build. No orange peel here, just a hint of witbier-redolent lemon peel. No banana, bubblegum, or overt clove esters from the yeast - just general vitaminy biscuity characteristics. Neither the wheat malt nor the barley tastes particularly fresh or vivid.
I find no booziness or off-flavours.
TEXTURE: Not unrefreshing. Light to medium-bodied. Smooth, wet, somewhat soft. Overcarbonated.
There's no natural harmony of texture and taste here. Needs a lighter, more refreshing body, and maybe a more delicate presence on the palate. I'd like to see more of a natural carbonation as well.
OVERALL: A forgettable hefeweizen, even by international standards (i.e., not merely comparing it to other Bavarian-brewed offerings - seeing as this is the best region for hefeweizen biere in the world). There are American expressions of the style I'd happily take over this, and that's not a sentiment I espouse often. (Offerings from Dry Dock, New Glarus, and of course Live Oak come to mind). In a country (and a Western world) in which Franziskaner is available on many a supermarket shelf, I can't see this gaining any traction in the market or amongst beer enthusiasts. Mundane, but drinkable and enjoyable for what it is. I wouldn't buy it again, but I do think it's above average overall in spite of its shallowness.
C+ (3.14) / ABOVE AVERAGE
Apr 05, 2016Served chilled into a weizenglas. Expectations are average; I believe this is my first beer from this brewery. Reviewed live as a hefeweizen (hefeweizen bright) per the label.
HEAD: Frothy, foamy, soft-looking, and healthy, lasting a good ~10 minutes. Occupies ~60% of the glass - pretty impressive. Some messy lacing clings to the sides of the glass as it recedes.
BODY: Cloudy rather than turbid or hazy, redolent more of a witbier than a hefeweizen. The lemon yellow coloration echoes that impression. Bright but not vibrant.
Looks pretty typical of the hefeweizen style, without suggesting a great expression thereof. I notice no unique or special characteristics.
AROMA: Dry wheat dominates. Clean malted barley. A hint of lemon peel. I'm not picking up on any banana, bubblegum, or orange peel. The yeast offers only some tame biscuity character and a hint of clove. The wheat and barley malts don't come off particularly fresh or vivid.
Aromatic intensity is average. Suggests an average quality hefeweizen.
TASTE: Poorly balanced, with a subpar build. No orange peel here, just a hint of witbier-redolent lemon peel. No banana, bubblegum, or overt clove esters from the yeast - just general vitaminy biscuity characteristics. Neither the wheat malt nor the barley tastes particularly fresh or vivid.
I find no booziness or off-flavours.
TEXTURE: Not unrefreshing. Light to medium-bodied. Smooth, wet, somewhat soft. Overcarbonated.
There's no natural harmony of texture and taste here. Needs a lighter, more refreshing body, and maybe a more delicate presence on the palate. I'd like to see more of a natural carbonation as well.
OVERALL: A forgettable hefeweizen, even by international standards (i.e., not merely comparing it to other Bavarian-brewed offerings - seeing as this is the best region for hefeweizen biere in the world). There are American expressions of the style I'd happily take over this, and that's not a sentiment I espouse often. (Offerings from Dry Dock, New Glarus, and of course Live Oak come to mind). In a country (and a Western world) in which Franziskaner is available on many a supermarket shelf, I can't see this gaining any traction in the market or amongst beer enthusiasts. Mundane, but drinkable and enjoyable for what it is. I wouldn't buy it again, but I do think it's above average overall in spite of its shallowness.
C+ (3.14) / ABOVE AVERAGE
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!