MX Dry 3.5
Independent Distillers (Aust)
- From:
- Independent Distillers (Aust)
- Australia
- Style:
- American Adjunct Lager
- ABV:
- 3.5%
- Score:
- +9 ratings needed
- Avg:
- 1.31 | pDev: 0%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 1
- Status:
- Inactive
- Rated:
- Dec 21, 2014
- Added:
- Dec 21, 2014
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 0
NO SCORE
-
-
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews.
Reviewed by SmashPants from Australia
1.31/5 rDev 0%
look: 2 | smell: 1 | taste: 1.25 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1
1.31/5 rDev 0%
look: 2 | smell: 1 | taste: 1.25 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1
I added this beer to BeerAdvocate predominantly as a warning to those with tastebuds.
Format: a standard 330mL clear bottle with a pretty rubbish macro label. Does not inspire confidence.
Appearance: pours a strong mid-amber yellow colour with chunky but sporadic carbonation - doesn't look brilliant at all. The head is a white half-finger that drops to a thin film immediately.
Aroma: oh dear, what is that? An awkward vegetal and chemical cleaner smell. Putrid.
Taste: fortunately the chemical cleaners have gone, to be replaced with that vegetal fug mixed with incredibly poor grain and adjuncts. This is a truly horrific beer.
Aftertaste: oddly for a macro lager - and particularly a mid-strength - the flavours linger for some time, which in this case is a cause for concern.
Mouth feel: light in body with a sharp but reasonable carbonation. This part of the beer is at least almost acceptable.
Overall: this is without a shadow of a doubt one of the worst beers I have ever had. It is cheap at AU$35 a case and it is a mid-strength, but seriously, just by XXXX Gold or Carlton Mid. I am actually a bit offended that they put this on sale. Gross.
Dec 21, 2014Format: a standard 330mL clear bottle with a pretty rubbish macro label. Does not inspire confidence.
Appearance: pours a strong mid-amber yellow colour with chunky but sporadic carbonation - doesn't look brilliant at all. The head is a white half-finger that drops to a thin film immediately.
Aroma: oh dear, what is that? An awkward vegetal and chemical cleaner smell. Putrid.
Taste: fortunately the chemical cleaners have gone, to be replaced with that vegetal fug mixed with incredibly poor grain and adjuncts. This is a truly horrific beer.
Aftertaste: oddly for a macro lager - and particularly a mid-strength - the flavours linger for some time, which in this case is a cause for concern.
Mouth feel: light in body with a sharp but reasonable carbonation. This part of the beer is at least almost acceptable.
Overall: this is without a shadow of a doubt one of the worst beers I have ever had. It is cheap at AU$35 a case and it is a mid-strength, but seriously, just by XXXX Gold or Carlton Mid. I am actually a bit offended that they put this on sale. Gross.
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!