Keisari 66 American Pale Ale
Nokian Panimo
- From:
- Nokian Panimo
- Finland
- Style:
- American Pale Ale
- ABV:
- 4.2%
- Score:
- +4 ratings needed
- Avg:
- 3.03 | pDev: 16.83%
- Ratings:
- | reviews: 3
- Status:
- Active
- Rated:
- Sep 05, 2024
- Added:
- Apr 12, 2014
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 5
NO SCORE
-
-
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews.
Reviewed by Sigmund from Norway
3.48/5 rDev +14.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5
3.48/5 rDev +14.9%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.5
April 2019: 500 ml can, as Nokian Panimo Keisari APA American Pale Ale. ABV 4.2%, EBU 55. Malts are pilsener, pale and crystal. Hops are Tomahawk, Tradition and Cascade. Orange colour, moderate white head. Aroma of fruity and herbal hops. Light bodied. The flavour is medium dry, with distinct piney, grapefruity and herbal hops.
Sep 05, 2024
Reviewed by Jugs_McGhee from Texas
2.37/5 rDev -21.8%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.25
2.37/5 rDev -21.8%
look: 2.75 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.25 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2.25
CAN: 50cl. 4.0% ABV. Aluminum. Standard pull-tab.
Brewed with tomahawk, tradition, and cascade hops.
Served cold into a mason jar. Reviewed live as an APA per the label. Expectations are below average given the brewery. Truncated notes below:
A: ~2.5 inch white head. Foamy and moderately thick, with good (~5 minute retention). Leaves no lacing as it recedes.
Pale copper of average vibrance. No yeast or hop sediment is visible.
Sm: Floral hops, pale malts, cotton candy. Bready. Fruity.
Aromatic intensity is average.
Pretty shallow and simple, with a muted boring hop profile.
T: Fruity and floral hops, with a juniper berry-esque bitterness. Hop profile is shallow and insufficient. The malt backbone is equally unremarkable - just generic caramalt and pale malts.
Unbalanced and poorly constructed for a pale ale. I don't hate it, but it leaves a lot to be desired.
Mf: Medium-bodied, smooth, wet, overcarbonated, and of average heft and weight. It's pretty basic; there's no custom-tailoring of texture to taste. Lacks harmony.
O: Not gestalt. A pretty bland and poorly constructed pale ale. Not undrinkable outside of style conventions, but it won't appease the discerning drinker - or likely even the casual drinker. Another dud from Nokian Panimo - quite possibly Finland's worst brewery.
D+ (2.37)
Jun 09, 2015Brewed with tomahawk, tradition, and cascade hops.
Served cold into a mason jar. Reviewed live as an APA per the label. Expectations are below average given the brewery. Truncated notes below:
A: ~2.5 inch white head. Foamy and moderately thick, with good (~5 minute retention). Leaves no lacing as it recedes.
Pale copper of average vibrance. No yeast or hop sediment is visible.
Sm: Floral hops, pale malts, cotton candy. Bready. Fruity.
Aromatic intensity is average.
Pretty shallow and simple, with a muted boring hop profile.
T: Fruity and floral hops, with a juniper berry-esque bitterness. Hop profile is shallow and insufficient. The malt backbone is equally unremarkable - just generic caramalt and pale malts.
Unbalanced and poorly constructed for a pale ale. I don't hate it, but it leaves a lot to be desired.
Mf: Medium-bodied, smooth, wet, overcarbonated, and of average heft and weight. It's pretty basic; there's no custom-tailoring of texture to taste. Lacks harmony.
O: Not gestalt. A pretty bland and poorly constructed pale ale. Not undrinkable outside of style conventions, but it won't appease the discerning drinker - or likely even the casual drinker. Another dud from Nokian Panimo - quite possibly Finland's worst brewery.
D+ (2.37)
Reviewed by JTuomi from Finland
3.9/5 rDev +28.7%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4
3.9/5 rDev +28.7%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 4
50cl can into a tulip. Hazy golden color with a three finger white head. Smell had hoppy grass, pine and lemon with some apple. Taste was crisp and bitter with grass and citrus. Long dry hop aftertaste with grapefruit and pine. Light body and medium carbonation. Very drinkable. Very good beer in it's price class.
Apr 12, 2014
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!