Add Enjoy By as a new beer?

Help Discussion in 'BeerAdvocate Talk' started by brureview, Jun 24, 2019.

?

Should each new Stone Brewing Enjoy By be added to Beer Advocate as a new beer?

  1. Yes

    31.3%
  2. No

    68.8%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. brureview

    brureview Pooh-Bah (2,803) Jan 20, 2012 Massachusetts
    Pooh-Bah

    Beer Advocate should have a new beer added for each Stone Brewing Enjoy By. The beer has substantially changed over the years with the development of new hops. It’s not the same beer.

    I don’t like deleting my original review, I’d rather review each Enjoy By as it comes out.
     
  2. TheIPAHunter

    TheIPAHunter Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,026) Aug 12, 2007 California
    Mod Team Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Good point, but where do we draw the line? There's a lot of OG beers that ARE NOT the same anymore. Cheers!
     
    Roguer and raynmoon like this.
  3. hoagzzz

    hoagzzz Zealot (682) Feb 28, 2014 Pennsylvania

    I vote yes as my main motivation in trying each edition is to beef up my Untappd stats.
     
  4. AZBeerDude72

    AZBeerDude72 Initiate (0) Jun 10, 2016 Arizona

    I would go with a yes since it is a new beer and should get rated as such.
     
    FBarber likes this.
  5. Roguer

    Roguer Grand High Pooh-Bah (7,811) Mar 25, 2013 Connecticut
    Mod Team Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    BeerAdvocate has very clearly drawn a line with respect to yearly (or more frequent, in the case of Enjoy By) iterations of the same beer: if there is a significant change (not just ABV, or a tweak to the hop load), it becomes a new beer.

    Funny enough, Untappd actually says the same thing on their site, but every single beer gets added as a yearly variation, even when there is no actual variety.

    I don't foresee Enjoy By being added as multiple beers, outside of the very specific variants, such as Unfiltered. I also don't see the need for it. Stone tweaks the recipe from time to time, but they're not releasing a wave of single hop Enjoy By iterations. If they did that, then yes, there would be a good reason to add new versions to the database.

    Cheers!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.