Adding Alpha Amylase to Lower FG

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by FeDUBBELFIST, Feb 23, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. FeDUBBELFIST

    FeDUBBELFIST Pooh-Bah (1,765) Oct 31, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    A while back I made 10 gallons of 1.100 imperial stout. Pitched directly on a yeast cake from a fresh fermentation. Aerated with pure o2, the whole nine. Fermentation took off as expected. Being such a big beer, I didn't even bother with a gravity reading for 2 months. When I finally took a reading, it measured 1.055.

    So, trying not to panic, I rehydrated two packets of US05, and pitched one to each fermenter, hoping that it would chew through the remaining 20 points. Fast forward to today, it didn't. The beer tastes great, but the gravity didn't budge.

    I've been reading up on alpha amylase additions. This seems like the route that I'm interesting in going. However, all of the threads that I've found are from a few years ago, and I'm looking for some more current advice. I'm mostly interested in technique and quantities. For example: Do I sprinkle the alpha amylase into the carboy? Do I sanitize water and mix the AA into that? What quantity of AA would be appropriate to handle another 20 gravity points? That type of stuff.

    Since this beer has been conditioning for roughly six months, I figure I should add some fresh yeast. Now that my basement temps are low, I was thinking I'd use dry lager yeast, rehydrated. What is the timetable for the AA and yeast additions? Co-pitch? Or should I give the AA some time to break down these longer chain sugars?

    Oh, in case you're wondering, the beer was all grain, 87% base malt (well 4:3 two row and maris otter). Thanks in advance for your help.

    Cheers!
     
  2. barfdiggs

    barfdiggs Initiate (0) Mar 22, 2011 California

    Who cares what the final gravity is if it tastes great? No one knows the FG when judging or drinking it, except you.
     
  3. FeDUBBELFIST

    FeDUBBELFIST Pooh-Bah (1,765) Oct 31, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Touche. I should have clarified:
    There is a great tasting beer hidden underneath an unwanted layer of sweetness. And I think it will be much better if I can get it down to 1.035. Any thoughts?
     
  4. ryane

    ryane Initiate (0) Nov 21, 2007 Washington

    brew another nearly identical recipe beer, but lower OG and get it to attenuate more, then blend the two to get your desired level of FG/Sweetness
     
  5. FeDUBBELFIST

    FeDUBBELFIST Pooh-Bah (1,765) Oct 31, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    I thought about doing that and probably will eventually. I would, however, still like to have a better understanding of how alpha amylase works though, just so I can feel comfortable using it when necessary.

    Just curious, since I was at 87% base grain, do you think if I mashed the same recipe at, say 149* for 90 minutes, that that could produce a low enough FG? I ask because I'd like to keep the imperial nature of this stout if possible.
     
  6. ryane

    ryane Initiate (0) Nov 21, 2007 Washington

    151 is supposed to be the sweet spot for attenuation, I would take the OG down for the blended batch

    1st Attempt 1100-1055 = 5.9% abv which is hardly imperial

    for the blended batch I would take the OG down a bit, use the same recipe just smaller, then add some sugar, pitch yeast and get it to attenuate ~1010, then blend

    Say you get 3gal of 1010 beer @ 9.7% + 5gal 1055 @ 5.9% = 8gal 1038 @ 7.3%

    7.3% is still barely imperial, you might either have to suffer with a sweet beer, or you could add some booze to the mix

    as to adding amylase in the fermentor, I wouldnt do it. I have done something similar with beano to get beer/mead to dry out and it will take it down below 1000. Amylase likely wont do this though, especially as the pH of your beer is likely a bit too low for it to work effectively

    i have a hard time believing that amylase will do much for you, I dont think long chain sugars were the problem with this beer, something else caught you on this one (btw what was your recipe/mash temp/yeast choice), in fact the more I type the less I think this beer is worth doing anything to. Personally I would either add some grain alcohol/bourbon, or freeze it and do something similar
     
    #6 ryane, Feb 23, 2014
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2014
  7. Ilanko

    Ilanko Initiate (0) Aug 3, 2012 New York

    I wold toss one pack of 3711 or 3724 with a proper starter and get imperial stout Saison out of it.
     
  8. barfdiggs

    barfdiggs Initiate (0) Mar 22, 2011 California

    Ahh... Ok, now the FG matters :wink:

    You could try to do something like 120 minute.... If your yeast is viable you could do sugar and yeast nutrient feedings over several days to bump up the abv but not the FG. While this wouldn't lower the sweetness it would up the abv which might help balance it out. Additionally, if it's not roasty enough you can add some sinamar.

    I wish I could tell you that adding alpha amylase would help, but I have no experience with it. The addition of alpha amylase also assumes your yeast is still viable, as the glucose and maltose released from its activity would still need to be fermented out, otherwise your beer might actually seem sweeter from the conversion of less sweet dextrins to sweeter glucose and maltose.


    Using beans would basically dry the beer out too much and leave it astringent and thin.
     
    FeDUBBELFIST likes this.
  9. billandsuz

    billandsuz Pooh-Bah (2,097) Sep 1, 2004 New York
    Pooh-Bah

    well, if you want the enzyme to do anything, it is going to need to be at the proper temperature to activate. and you probably don't want to warm your beer up to that temp (alpha is 140s? dunno. warm.)

    I say love it like it is. that's just me.
     
  10. honkey

    honkey Maven (1,350) Aug 28, 2010 Arizona
    Trader

    I wouldn't think adding amylase to a fermenter would do much good since you are so far out of the optimal temperature range. Also, it would be beta amylase you would want anyways as it is the enzyme that will break starches down into small sugars. Alpha amylase is what produces dextrins, which you either already have a lot of, or something went wrong with your yeast (seems much more likely to me looking at those numbers).

    Edit: I should have specified that beta amylase will work if alpha amylase has already exposed the branches from amylopectin that beta amylase could then handle. However, if you still have amylopectin that hasn't been broken down, than you had a mashing problem. Either way, it is unlikely that adding enzymes now will do you any good due to the temp range.
     
  11. hopfenunmaltz

    hopfenunmaltz Pooh-Bah (2,635) Jun 8, 2005 Michigan
    Pooh-Bah

    Have you done a Fast Fermentation Test? Pull some, dose it with more yeast and put it Ina warm location. Measure the gravity and compare to the main fermenter.

    Years back many would add to the fermenter, it will work slowly. It might help, give it time as the conversion rate will be lower. You want a self limiting product. Stay away from Beano, which was what many used 10+ years back, that chews through everything leaving a thin beer.

    For those that say it works at a higher temp, that is the optimum so we don't have to mash for a week or 2. Those enzymes are what turn the starches to sugars for the plant embryo in the field at spring temperatures.

    A product to use in the fermenter is the top one.
    http://bsghandcraft.com/resources/beer_processing_aids/
     
    barfdiggs and honkey like this.
  12. billandsuz

    billandsuz Pooh-Bah (2,097) Sep 1, 2004 New York
    Pooh-Bah

  13. honkey

    honkey Maven (1,350) Aug 28, 2010 Arizona
    Trader

    Forced fermentation test is a good suggestion.
     
  14. hopfenunmaltz

    hopfenunmaltz Pooh-Bah (2,635) Jun 8, 2005 Michigan
    Pooh-Bah

    You may need a commercial account, but something tells me you could get it through work.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.