Aging BCBS

Discussion in 'Cellaring / Aging Beer' started by frankb34, Jul 7, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. RyanMM

    RyanMM Crusader (403) Mar 12, 2009 Michigan

    I figured the ABV change was a result of inconsistencies year to year in fermentation, similar to how Avery and DFH's bigger beers vary year to year.

    But yeah, them having been low to begin with certainly wouldn't surprise me. I always thought the burn on BCBS was always pretty reasonable given a 13%+ ABV.
     
  2. RyanMM

    RyanMM Crusader (403) Mar 12, 2009 Michigan

    None needed, that'd be a tough joke to make without a sarcmark and given how much some of us love our BCBS. :slight_smile:
     
  3. Dupage25

    Dupage25 Savant (1,044) Jul 4, 2013 Antarctica


    I'm just thinking of it in the context of the problems they had with King Henry in Minnesota (or was it Michigan?). Label information: 13.4% alcohol. State label authorities/liquor board says: our tests show it's over 16%. Seems they might want to deliberately overestimate a bit to avoid that kind of issue.

    Of course, they could just blend it, measure it, and then do the labels with more accurate information. Don't think anyone would notice if it spent an extra two or three months at the brewery while waiting for label approval.
     
  4. krl2112

    krl2112 Pooh-Bah (1,876) Nov 10, 2012 Illinois
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    Agreed. Fresh it's pretty boozy. But a couple of years and its delicious!!
     
  5. MssrTussaud

    MssrTussaud Initiate (0) Apr 17, 2013 California

    That's interesting info! Do you have a link?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.