Best Practice for Wy1056?

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by utahbeerdude, Sep 8, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. utahbeerdude

    utahbeerdude Maven (1,374) May 2, 2006 Utah

    So my recent American pale ale has finished the most active part of its fermentation (4 days, and bubbling has slowed way down), which was carried out at 66 +-3 degrees F. So it is now best to raise the temperature somewhat as it finishes or leave it where it is?

    I ask because this is is what Jamil Z. and John P. recommended for lagers on a Brew Strong podcast. So I am wondering if ales might also benefit.
     
  2. FATC1TY

    FATC1TY Pooh-Bah (2,564) Feb 12, 2012 Georgia
    Pooh-Bah

    It would. I normally keep them cool till they slow, or until airlock activity is minimal, and then allow it to warm up slowly over time for a few days. I think I've read that it helps rouse the yeast to finish cleaning up after themselves. I do it out of just being lazy and not wanting to continue to keep it cool, or take up precious space.
     
  3. OddNotion

    OddNotion Pooh-Bah (1,915) Nov 1, 2009 New Jersey
    Pooh-Bah

    Raising the temp for lagers is for 2 days or so for a diacetyl rest before the lagering period. However, I have read and heard about a lot of brewers raising the temp at the end of fermentation for ale yeast as well.
     
  4. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Raising the temp for 1056 will make the rest of the attenuation and cleanup happen faster. So if that's important to you, there's the benefit. But as far as taste goes , I don't think 1056 needs a temp bump, though it probably won't hurt.
     
  5. MLucky

    MLucky Initiate (0) Jul 31, 2010 California

    A lot of guys do raise the temp a few degrees at the end of fermentation for ales. As others have said, it's probably more common (and more needed) to do this with lagers, but it might get you a little more attenuation and/or cleanup with ales, or at least speed things up. In this particular case, 1056 is so fast, so clean, and such an overachiever attenuation-wise it's probably not needed, especially on a pale, which I assume was probably lower OG. Cheers!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.