Brew In a Bag - What Efficiency Can I Expect?

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by sjverla, Jul 30, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. sjverla

    sjverla Initiate (0) Dec 1, 2008 Massachusetts

    I'm making the step to all-grain, starting with BIAB. I'd heard that efficiency with BIAB can suffer, but then doing some research, it seems like it can be as high as 85%.

    I don't have any boil-off estimates yet, but will update this thread next week after I move and put together a system of sorts and test a boil-off rate.

    I'm doing a two-row/Simcoe smash, shooting for a pitching OG of around 1.053. Ideally it would finish around 5.5% or so. But I'm not worried about the strength. I just don't want this to be underhopped - so I turn to you all, who are incredibly helpful.

    For 5 gallons, here's what I'm thinking (calculations by Brewtoad):
    9.5# 2-row
    5 oz Simcoe (nevermind the schedule). I have a pound and may step it up.

    Mash 4.75 gallons at 153 for 60 min (expecting to lose ~1.25 gal to absorption - is this way off?)
    Modified 'sparge' with 3 gallons (depending on future, better boil-off prediction)

    Boil 60 minutes.

    I don't have any kettle dead space (no valve).

    My specific questions are:
    How do I know what my pre-boil OG should be?
    How could I compensate for it being higher than expected (other than using AlC's infamous MOAR HOPS)?
    And what seems to be the most common outcome for BIAB - slightly higher or slightly lower efficiency?

    Thanks!
     
  2. clearbrew

    clearbrew Initiate (0) Nov 3, 2009 Louisiana

    I really don't have much experience with BIAB, but I would say figure about .7 or .8 Gal/hr boil off. Also your water measurements seem off (unless I'm missing something). I would mash with about 3.2 gal and sparge with about 4.4gal.
    I'm not sure what your pre-boil og should be, but you can just take a hydrometer reading after mashing, before boiling (remember to adjust for temp). You could try plugging the pre-boil water volume into you calculator as the final volume (or batch size), then see what it says the FG should be. That should be pretty close to the pre-boil gravity. The only variable there would be the mash efficiency. I would use about 70% efficiency to figure your recipe the first time.
    As for higher or lower, I think it would vary for everyone. But if you have a big enough bag, and the mash and sparge water can flow through the grains easily I don't see why there would be a difference. IOW, done properly, it should be pretty damn close. It's my understanding that the bag only replaces the screen or the false bottom of the mash tun.
     
  3. TheMonkfish

    TheMonkfish Initiate (0) Jan 8, 2012 Chad

    I think 70% is a good starting point. I did one BIAB batch and got 69% (and squeezed the bag like it owed me money.)
     
    checktherhyme likes this.
  4. cavedave

    cavedave Grand Pooh-Bah (4,157) Mar 12, 2009 New York
    In Memoriam Pooh-Bah Trader

    I have gotten as high as 85%, but average around 70/75%. I am not a fan of bag squeezing, if gravity can pull it out while it rests it goes into the kettle, otherwise it goes to compost.
     
  5. jlordi12

    jlordi12 Pooh-Bah (1,856) Jun 8, 2011 Massachusetts
    Pooh-Bah

    I get about 65. I'm not very good about insulating though
     
  6. sjverla

    sjverla Initiate (0) Dec 1, 2008 Massachusetts


    How long to you rest/drain it for?
     
  7. cavedave

    cavedave Grand Pooh-Bah (4,157) Mar 12, 2009 New York
    In Memoriam Pooh-Bah Trader

    10/15 minutes while the kettle comes to boil.
     
  8. sjverla

    sjverla Initiate (0) Dec 1, 2008 Massachusetts


    Could you expand on that a little more?

    It seems like the gravity difference between 70%-80% is about 7 points. So it seems like anywhere in that range should get me to a beer I want to drink, given my volume calculations don't further mess things up too much.
     
    inchrisin likes this.
  9. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    The OP stated that they intend to brew via the Brew in a Bag (BIAB) method. My understanding of the BIAB method is that you mash the grains (in the bag) and then simply remove the bag.

    The OP then stated: “Modified 'sparge' with 3 gallons (depending on future, better boil-off prediction)”. So, a sparge is intended? If that is the case then based upon my understanding of the BIAB method (as detailed above) the OP will not be mashing as per the BIAB method.

    I am uncertain what the terminology of “Modified ‘sparge’” means. Is the intention to conduct a fly sparge? Is the intention to conduct a batch sparge?

    Cheers!
     
  10. jlordi12

    jlordi12 Pooh-Bah (1,856) Jun 8, 2011 Massachusetts
    Pooh-Bah

    I think in BIAB a dunk sparge would be the batch sparge equivalent and Fly sparge would be exactly the same but rinsing the grains through the bag.
     
  11. pweis909

    pweis909 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,250) Aug 13, 2005 Wisconsin
    Pooh-Bah

    I have done a modified brew in the bag (essentially) with batch sparging. Mind you, this is not my normal mode of brewing. I ended up using a biab to lauter a couple sparges that stuck because of adjunct grains. I scooped out the mash tun and strained the contents through the bag, directing the liquid to the boil kettle. I then put the biab with semi-spent grain in the mash tun and added my sparge water. I swriled the bag in the water to simulate stirring the batchsparge, but was careful to keep the grain in the bag so I didn't have to scoop stuff up again. These were not the most elegant brew days!
     
  12. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    In the OP: “And what seems to be the most common outcome for BIAB - slightly higher or slightly lower efficiency?”

    Since sjverla appears to be doing something different than BIAB (since: modified sparge) it seems that the proper question should be what kind of efficiency can he expect from his BIAB plus modified sparge method?

    I personally do not know the answer to the above question but maybe somebody else can opine on this topic.

    Cheers!
     
  13. sjverla

    sjverla Initiate (0) Dec 1, 2008 Massachusetts

    Probably because I'm uncertain about what I'm talking about.



    This is what I'm planning on doing. I say modified 'sparge' because I'll be rinsing the grains, but instead of controlling flow rate carefully, I'd be slowly pouring hot water through a colander over the grain. I don't know if it has any real benefit, but it might, at least in my head.
     
  14. jlordi12

    jlordi12 Pooh-Bah (1,856) Jun 8, 2011 Massachusetts
    Pooh-Bah

    Some people swear by it, so it can't hurt to try. Be very careful or you'll end up with grains in your wort like I've done before and you'll have to filter all over again.
     
  15. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    “I don't know if this has any real benefit, but it might, at least in my head.” Rinsing your grains will most definitely have a benefit. You are essentially conducting a fly sparge. The ‘challenge’ is quantifying your overall method with an accurate estimate of efficiency.

    Brewers who conduct a ‘conscientious’ fly sparge are capable of obtaining very high efficiencies. A ‘conscientious’ fly sparge means that you maintain a small amount of hot water on top of the grain bed and maintain this small amount of hot water via slowly adding small amounts of sparge water to maintain this low amount. A ‘conscientious’ fly sparge could take something like 45 minutes. If you rinse your grains over a shorter time period (let’s say 10-15 minutes for discussion purposes) you will obtain a lower efficiency then a conscientious fly sparge brewer would.

    Cheers!
     
  16. barfdiggs

    barfdiggs Initiate (0) Mar 22, 2011 California

    I've been doing BIAB when brewing on a tight schedule (e.g. trying to get 4 batches in during a brewing session instead of 2) and have had great luck with it.

    My efficiency is consistently around 82% (n=4, SD ~1%), however I've only brewed beers in the O.G. range of 1.048-1.065, so nothing big (1.075+), which I think is where BIAB efficiency may really drop off (Completely speculation).

    Regarding process, my efficiency may be high due to extensive recirculation of the BIAB mash (when mashing in, while maintaining mash temp and heating up to mash out). I haven't "sparged" my BIAB mashes, although I do take the mash bag and place it on a large metal double colander on top of a Homer's bucket to drain (no squeezing, just gravity), and then add the drainage back to the kettle.

    If just doing a 2-row and Simcoe SMaSH, just keep it simple and stick with your schedule, even if efficiency goes up or down. You'll already be doing something new, so why add another variable or more hassle to the brew day. If its not as hoppy as you want, you can always up the dry hop amount.

    Your boil off amount will be the same as your normal boil off amount (e.g. x gallons per 1 hour). I've had a little bit of an issue calculating the mash water volumes due to the amount of water absorption by the grains, but just keep good notes and adjust future batches.
     
    Eriktheipaman likes this.
  17. sjverla

    sjverla Initiate (0) Dec 1, 2008 Massachusetts


    This is probably more along the lines of what I'll be doing. I was thinking that after mashing, I would pull the grain bag and put into my empty 5-gal kettle and slowly pour hot water over the bag to reach my boil volume. Collect the runnings and put them into my 10 gal with the rest of the wort. Stir and measure.

    According to this calculator, with 75% efficiency, my pre-boil OG should be around 1.043. Which, if doing the rinse get's me a little better than 70%, I could come pretty close to.
     
  18. psnydez86

    psnydez86 Initiate (0) Jan 4, 2012 Pennsylvania

    I was getting ~65% when I did BIAB. I dont have a mill so i didnt have control of my crush, so I think a finer grind is best for the BIAB method if you have an adjustable mill.
     
  19. sjverla

    sjverla Initiate (0) Dec 1, 2008 Massachusetts

    What's your method for recirculating?

    I think it was leedorham who said something like 'simple is dumb.' My last couple beers haven't been as hoppy as I wanted and I'm hoping I can really get this to where I want it to be.


    New kettle on a new stove doing a new method. No pre-existing data. This'll be all sorts of educational. Of course when n=1, significance=0, so I'll have some work ahead of me after this batch.
     
  20. barfdiggs

    barfdiggs Initiate (0) Mar 22, 2011 California

    Ball valve of kettle open, out to march pump, back up into kettle recirculation fitting. I noticed above you have no kettle valve, so that obviously won't work for you. Best thing I can say to do would be to stir very well and add a little bit of grain at a time when adding grain to the mash water. The first time started recirculating after mashing in, my efficiency went up about 10%.

    To each his own. I've started backing off the hops a bit on my hoppy beers as I felt I've been going overboard on the late hops and dry hops and as a result my beers were suffering (Coming off a little muddled). My previous comment was more about not switching it up on brew day, as its just another variable to deal with, but if you're comfortable, go for it.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.