Brewers Association: Next New Style

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by mnstorm99, Aug 27, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. mnstorm99

    mnstorm99 Initiate (0) May 11, 2007 Minnesota

    So back in 2010 the Brewers Association started recognizing the American Style India Black Ale (still not BJCP, if it ever will), and it got me to thinking what brewing trends are we seeing that could create the new recognized "style".
    My #1 vote is based on the increasing popularity in session brewing, and the increasing amount of low ABV hoppy beers in the market. As a homebrewer, it is my favorite style to brew. American Bitter? Session Pale Ale? Or, would the guidelines on this style be too close to an APA?
    How about an Imperial Red? Or, West Coast Amber? They have both been brewed for quite some time, and again are probably too close to other recognized styles.

    I just thought this could spark some decent conversation. We know we are all homebrewers and craft beer lovers so "style" really means nothing, but the Brewers Association comes out with their style guidelines for a reason and it doesn't hurt to discuss.
     
  2. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    I would vote for this one. If only so that people might stop calling Nugget Nectar an IPA.
     
    mporter13 and mnstorm99 like this.
  3. leedorham

    leedorham Initiate (0) Apr 27, 2006 Washington

    Yeah, they've gotta cave to imperial red/amber pretty soon. Who knows how they label it though. It may just end up being "American Strong Amber/Red."

    I could also see citrus IPA's getting a category separate from fruit-beers.
     
  4. mnstorm99

    mnstorm99 Initiate (0) May 11, 2007 Minnesota

    I was thinking the West Coast Amber, for the same reason in the case of Furious.
     
  5. LeeryLeprechaun

    LeeryLeprechaun Savant (1,094) Jan 30, 2011 Colorado
    Trader

    I would like to see "American Wild Ale" as a style and a better breakdown of Belgian Strong Dark Ales.
     
  6. mnstorm99

    mnstorm99 Initiate (0) May 11, 2007 Minnesota

    American-Style Brett Ale and American-Style Sour Ale are already recognized. Forgive my possible ignorance, but would those fit in the "wild ale" catagory? Or is it a further breakdown?
     
  7. bbarrows

    bbarrows Crusader (459) Sep 14, 2008 California

    Along the lines of session beers: Belgian patersbier.
     
  8. mnstorm99

    mnstorm99 Initiate (0) May 11, 2007 Minnesota

    Belgian Style Table Beer is already recognized, same thing right?
     
  9. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    I think people are getting the (professional) Brewer's Association confused with the AHA/BJCP.
     
  10. mnstorm99

    mnstorm99 Initiate (0) May 11, 2007 Minnesota

    Seems that way. Homebrewers get pretty caught up in BJCP :slight_smile:
     
  11. luisfrancisco

    luisfrancisco Zealot (642) Dec 1, 2009 Mexico

    I'd like to see a category for Old IPAs which would be for IPAs that have stood on shelves more than 2 weeks. That and a Black Wit Ale.
     
  12. geocool

    geocool Savant (1,233) Jun 21, 2006 Massachusetts

  13. hopfenunmaltz

    hopfenunmaltz Pooh-Bah (2,647) Jun 8, 2005 Michigan
    Pooh-Bah

    One also needs to also know that the AHA uses BJCP guidelines for competitions, but the BJCP is not part of the AHA.
     
  14. cracker

    cracker Pundit (893) May 2, 2004 Pennsylvania

    Personally I brew what I like and could care less about style guidlines. Have I looked at them? Sure. But I don't enter or brew for competitions so it means little to me.
     
  15. leedorham

    leedorham Initiate (0) Apr 27, 2006 Washington

    It really means more for the world of commercial craft beer. There's kind of a chicken & egg thing where several brewers will make a "style" popular, the BA recognizes it and it gets listed in competitions, then more brewers brew it because it's been recognized.
     
  16. mnstorm99

    mnstorm99 Initiate (0) May 11, 2007 Minnesota

    I agree and could care less. But, it can still make decent conversation...everything starts as a style (or idea), whether it is recognized or not. Style does nothing more for me than help explain what my friends are drinking that I have brewed.
     
  17. cracker

    cracker Pundit (893) May 2, 2004 Pennsylvania

    Sure I understand. But this is a homebrew subforum after all though hence my response.
     
  18. leedorham

    leedorham Initiate (0) Apr 27, 2006 Washington

    Better report this thread.
     
    jlpred55 and cracker like this.
  19. nathanjohnson

    nathanjohnson Initiate (0) Aug 5, 2007 Vermont

    Fewer styles, broader ranges. For example, I like to brew what I call "American Bitters", ~1.040 OG, 35IBU, big hop character. It should easily fit into the lower OG spectrum of american pale ales. (This comment isn't just directed at BA/AHA/BJCP etc), but in general.
     
    udubdawg and Thorpe429 like this.
  20. cracker

    cracker Pundit (893) May 2, 2004 Pennsylvania

    Well if you want me to play I can. Take a look at some of the pilsners brewed in the US. As an example, one brewed nearby where I live, Victory Prima Pils, is definitely much hoppier than what the so called style guidelines say about German pilsners. I am certain it is more than 40IBUs. Tuppers' Hop Pocket Pils is similar in that regard. Does that mean that a category called Imperial pilsner or india pilsner should be created? I don't think so.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.