Brewhouse (in)efficiency

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by magoo0903, Oct 16, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    I'm a little surprised you need to add acid at all for a stout. Is your water extremely alkaline? FWIW, I like to target about 5.5 for stouts and other dark, malty beers.
     
    Eggman20 and dmtaylor like this.
  2. dmtaylor

    dmtaylor Savant (1,149) Dec 30, 2003 Wisconsin

    Ditto. I use baking soda in my stouts to bring pH up. Never add acid. And my water is very alkaline.
     
  3. Eggman20

    Eggman20 Crusader (433) Feb 14, 2017 Minnesota

    Yeah it'd be shocking if you needed to lower PH with all the dark malts needed in a stout. I tend to use pickling lime to raise my ph.
     
    dmtaylor likes this.
  4. magoo0903

    magoo0903 Initiate (0) Nov 26, 2008 North Carolina

    It is on the higher side - 210 ppm (Bicarbonate is 250 ppm)
    Brunwater recommended .68 mL / gal of lactic acid to reach pH 5.4
    I will brew a stout again Friday, I won't add acid and check the pH and report!
     
  5. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    If you'd like, pm me your grain bill, water profile, and strike water volume. I could verify with another model.
     
  6. Tebuken

    Tebuken Initiate (0) Jun 6, 2009 Argentina

    Maybe you are mashing at a high temp using a low Ph wich is the opposite way to get better convertion. Higher mashing temp needs of higher Ph values to get better preformance of the encymatic action and vice-versa.
     
  7. magoo0903

    magoo0903 Initiate (0) Nov 26, 2008 North Carolina

    ok - I have brewed an American Amber ale today. Efficency remain in the mid 60%... 64% to be exact...

    Brew session was good.

    Mill is calibrated at .7mm so .276

    Mashed started at 153.2*F and ended at 151*F without HERMS
    pH was 5.49 when I was 22 min in the mash
    pH dropped to 5.37 when I was 8 min in mash out

    My mash was stuck but I managed to pull 8.5 gal from the mash tun

    OG was 1.052 instead of 1.058 as calculated in beersmith

    I am now fermenting 6 gal @ 69*F

    Thanks again for reading
     
    GormBrewhouse likes this.
  8. dmtaylor

    dmtaylor Savant (1,149) Dec 30, 2003 Wisconsin

    Okay...... it's got to be one of these things then:

    1) Are your volume measurements exactly in line with your brewing software, pre and post boil? And...
    2) Are you collecting every drop of wort out of the mash tun? If not, you are wasting sugar.
    3) Is there a lot of dead space under the false bottom?
    4) Have you calibrated your hydrometer very recently?
    5) Do you calibrate your pH meter with each and every use?

    It's one or more of the above things.
     
    GormBrewhouse likes this.
  9. magoo0903

    magoo0903 Initiate (0) Nov 26, 2008 North Carolina

    Thanks for your answer

    1. Pretty close - I had a bit more left in my kettle post boil but less than 2 quarts
    2. There was less than 2 quarts left there too. Hard to get it all today due to the mash being stuck...
    3. Not a lot of dead space
    4.yes and I bought a second one and I have a refractometer
    5. Yes. Calibrated today too

    The sodium in my water is high. 88ppm if memory serves...
    Could it be the problem?

    Thanks again
     
    GormBrewhouse likes this.
  10. dmtaylor

    dmtaylor Savant (1,149) Dec 30, 2003 Wisconsin

    It is not the sodium.

    Looks like you've wasted almost a gallon of good wort. My advice is to collect all this volume and even add in the middle of the boil if necessary so as not to waste all these extra sugars. There's your lost efficiency.
     
    GormBrewhouse and riptorn like this.
  11. magoo0903

    magoo0903 Initiate (0) Nov 26, 2008 North Carolina

    Ok and should I boil longer or stronger to have a greater evaporation? So my kettle gets closer to fully empty?
    Thx
     
    GormBrewhouse likes this.
  12. invertalon

    invertalon Pooh-Bah (2,249) Jan 27, 2009 Ohio
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    If you can't find the source of your problem, then you may just have to pony up $1 or $2 more in grain and be done with it. I am often at 68% brewhouse efficiency for beers in the 5-6% range... 64% is common for 7%ish beers and it continues to drop as the OG goes up.

    Confirm your mash and sparge volumes (weight is a great way if you have scale capacity, 8.34lb per gallon of water). Record your pre-boil and post-boil gravity... Refine in your boil off rates (mine is .8 gal/hr compared to the default over a gallon I believe) and all that in beer smith. It takes a few batches, but eventually you tune in your system. Consistency is what you want, don't worry too much about trying to hit numbers other people can in terms of brew house efficiency, no need to.
     
    dmtaylor likes this.
  13. dmtaylor

    dmtaylor Savant (1,149) Dec 30, 2003 Wisconsin

    You can if you want, but you shouldn't need to. If you can drain every drop out of the mash, then you won't need to use as much strike water up front, and thus wouldn't need to boil longer or harder to get the same final volume. But if you want to just live with the losses and not change your process, then yes, you can improve efficiency by collecting more sparge and boiling a little longer or harder. Either way will work.

    That, of course, is a third option. Just assume your efficiency is less than it used to be, and design your recipes with more grains accordingly.
     
    GormBrewhouse likes this.
  14. magoo0903

    magoo0903 Initiate (0) Nov 26, 2008 North Carolina

    Thanks guys. I’ll do that. I’ll set my BH efficiency lower and work on the mash process. Next is an IPA.
    I’ll just post back to keep you all aware.
    Hopefully I’m not killing you wit this thread...
    Thx
    Matt
     
    GormBrewhouse likes this.
  15. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    88 ppm sodium isn't a problem in itself. It can actually accentuate sweet flavors. But high sodium (which is in the water as a positively charged cation) means that there will be relatively less Calcium and Magnesium (also cations) to balance the negatively charged carbonates/bicarbonates (anions). Calcium and Magnesium lower the mash pH (by reacting with phosphates from the malt, releasing H+ into the mash), so if you don't have much Ca/Mg, but do have a lot of alkalinity (bicarbonates/carbonates), the residual alkalinity (and pH) of the mash will tend to be high. All of that is to say that sodium doesn't impact mash pH directly, but it does indirectly.
     
  16. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Too late to edit, so I'll add in a reply... to clarify, I really should have said "...it can indirectly." Sodium could also be balancing against Chlorides (for example), in which case there's no impact to alkalinity or pH from the Sodium/Chloride combo.
     
    magoo0903 likes this.
  17. Brewday

    Brewday Zealot (721) Dec 25, 2015 New York

    Today i played around to see if i could increase my efficiency because i also had some batches come out 10-12 points lower and was able to come 2 points from my target. Besides grain crush and ph i did a few changes. Add a silicon hose to dip tube that touches the bottom. I use a coldbreak false bottom that sits above the drain.Mashed at 147 for 90-100 mins instead of 60. Let the mashout sit for 20 mins instead of 10. Also mixed the grains more then usual.
    [​IMG]
     
    #37 Brewday, Oct 29, 2018
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2018
    GormBrewhouse likes this.
  18. jimboothdesigns

    jimboothdesigns Initiate (0) Nov 1, 2014 Pennsylvania

    Double check the mill sides. I know of an instance where the sides of the mill (next to the rollers) are made of masonite and they were getting pushed out and letting unmilled grain pass.
     
    riptorn likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.