Bruery question

Discussion in 'Beer Talk' started by Christopher0331, Apr 8, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Christopher0331

    Christopher0331 Initiate (0) Sep 8, 2013 Illinois

    So I am putting together a Bruery tasting in May for Chicago Craft Beer Week.
    I am curious as to how many years/batches were bottled of the following and when the earliest was.

    White Chocolate

    and correct me if I'm wrong but 2009 was the first year BT was bottled.

    Thanks I appreciate it.
     
  2. Lordquackingstic

    Lordquackingstic Pundit (998) Jun 14, 2011 New York
    Trader

    White chocolate was produced in 2012 and 2013 (one batch per year). I highly reccomend drinking the 2012, as 2013 is infected. And yes, 2009 was B1 of BT.

    Have fun getting smashed on ridiculously high gravity beers!
     
    ufmj likes this.
  3. RDMII

    RDMII Initiate (0) Apr 11, 2010 Georgia

    I want to say WC was first bottled in 2012. BT was indeed 2009.

    Or, what he said^.
     
  4. matedog

    matedog Crusader (457) Jan 25, 2010 California

    Not all 2013 was infected. The bottle I had was fine and very similar to the 2012. I don't know what the infection rate is and how dicey obtaining a 2013 is.
     
  5. StoutSnob40

    StoutSnob40 Grand Pooh-Bah (4,611) Jan 4, 2013 California
    Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Sometimes I dream about Black Tuesday..
     
  6. beernuts

    beernuts Initiate (0) Jan 23, 2014 Virginia

    ugh QUIT SAYING INFECTED!!!

    contaminated is the right word for when unwanted bacteria produce off-flavors in beer.
     
    Ozzylizard likes this.
  7. Lordquackingstic

    Lordquackingstic Pundit (998) Jun 14, 2011 New York
    Trader

    It really depends on what way you look at it. I work in a geomicrobiology lab culturing bacteria day in and day out, and contaminated is the term I'd use for something that was exposed to unwanted/outside organisms, not infected. Infected is more of a biologically infested wound that cannot heal by itself, if at all.

    However, in our hobby of beer geekery, we just use the term infected. Is it right in the true definition of the word? No. But eh, whatever, it gets the point across and we all know what it means when we see it.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.