Conditioning/Bottling/Flavor change questions.

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by Hogue2112, May 24, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Hogue2112

    Hogue2112 Initiate (0) Apr 7, 2016 Ohio

    Hello!

    So I have a question/concern/observation about our more recent brews, and I would appreciate your input on this!

    What really brought my attention to this was our most recent IPA. It is a two heart clone, I have the recipe and notes about brew day, dates, etc. I can and will provide, but currently at work without my brew bible.

    This was the first brew that we dry hopped, and were super stoked at how the brew tasted in all stages. From post boil into primary, pre dry hop, post dry hop/bottling, and day 2 after bottling.
    We have been trying to learn as much as we can from our brews, so we have been periodically cracking open bottles after bottling to try and figure out/taste what is actually going on with this bottle conditioning process. In fact, day 2 after bottling this beer tasted AMAZING. It was juicy and fresh, full of body and didn't taste any negative off flavors. Totally was stoked for this to finish bottle conditioning and actually carbonate, etc.

    However, 9 days after bottling - Brew buddy and I cracked open a bottle and were disappointed. The beer had lost it's "juiciness" and freshness, I could taste what I consider to be chloromine (medical/sterile taste) as well. At least is was carbonated just about as much as I would like to see - could use some more.

    Based off of that short write-up, what else would you like to know to help troubleshoot?

    We do a good cleaning/sterilizing job of our bottles I think. Clean well before bottling day - (using old bottles from commercial beer that will be recycled back into home brew production) using PBW and a brush.

    Sterilize literally seconds before bottling, have a pan full of StarSan - submerge bottles, fill up half way or so, shake the crap out them, dump and then fill and cap. (with sterilized caps)

    Recipe:

    6.6 lb Briess Golden Light LME
    2.5 lb Golden Light DME
    8 oz Caramel Malt
    1.2 oz (34 g) | Centennial pellets, 9.1% a.a. (45 min)
    1.2 oz (34 g) | Centennial pellets, 9.1% a.a. (30 min)
    3.5 oz (99 g) | Centennial pellets, 9.1% a.a. (dry hop)
    WLP California Ale V Yeast
    Dry Hopped for 6 days before bottling

    OG =
    FG =
    Notes =

    Thanks in advance!
     
  2. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    I do not want to generate too much alarm here but when a hoppy beer seems to suffer from "hop fade" the first thing that is discussed is the potential for oxidation. I am not intimately familiar with all of the details of the chemistry of oxidative reactions but it seems that observing results of oxidation so quickly (i.e., 9 days) is not likely? Can you provide more details on your bottling process with specific attention to exposure to air (oxygen) during bottling?
    What water did you use to brew your beer? If you used municipal tap water what method did you use to eliminate chlorine/chloramine from the water?

    Cheers!
     
  3. Hogue2112

    Hogue2112 Initiate (0) Apr 7, 2016 Ohio

     
  4. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    @Hogue2112


    “Siphon from secondary fermenter into bottling bucket.” I would recommend that you not use a secondary for future batches. It is unnecessary for most beer styles (exceptions are sours, fruited beers, oaked beers, lagers) and the transfer from primary to secondary is a risk of further aeration (oxygenation) of the beer plus the potential for infection.

    “Avoiding splashing and keeping the siphon hose under the surface as much as possible.” Yup. you want to avoid splashing.

    “We do not cover the bottling bucket once the beer has been transferred to it. Should we?” I do not cover my bottling bucket. Where aeration (oxygenation) is of most concern is rough handling (e.g., splashing), poor siphoning technique where you see bubbles (air) in the tubes, etc. Just having the beer on the top of the bottling bucket exposed to air is a lesser concern.

    “However, I have been unable to determine if filtering through this 5 micron is enough treatment.” I have no familiarity with your water filtration system so I can’t provide comment here. I use a dual stage carbon block filtering system which greatly reduces the chloramine of my municipal tap water. I know this because I test the filtered water using Hach test strips: http://www.hach.com/free-total-chlorine-test-strips-0-10-mg-l/product?id=7640211603

    The other option to reduce chloramine is to use campden tablets to pretreat the brewing water.



    I want to emphasize that I am not definitively stating that your beer is suffering from oxidation given the timeframes being discussed (e.g., 9 days) but the symptoms you are describing are indeed consistent with oxidation.

    Cheers!
     
  5. scottakelly

    scottakelly Maven (1,487) May 9, 2007 Ohio

    When you transfer from primary to secondary, and then from secondary to bottling bucket, and then from bottling bucket to bottle, you are introducing oxygen each time. Secondary should really not be needed for an IPA. My normal process is to just go straight from the primary to the keg. If I was bottling and had a bottling bucket, I would just ferment in the bottling bucket and bottle directly.

    My brewing experience is limited to well water and RO water, so I'll let others tackle the likely chloromine issue.
     
  6. scottakelly

    scottakelly Maven (1,487) May 9, 2007 Ohio

    Forgot to ask if you use an autosiphon? I never use them since the bubbles in the transferring beer are always problematic for me.
     
    JackHorzempa likes this.
  7. Hogue2112

    Hogue2112 Initiate (0) Apr 7, 2016 Ohio

    Thanks for the response!

    A problem that we have is that we don't have enough primary's! We should buy some more 6.5 gallon carboys!

    So the secondary was not only as recommended by LHBS guys, but it would free up a primary.
    Anyway - The beer was amazing two days after being last exposed to oxygen. 7 days later it is pretty bunked. I feel like the exposure to oxygen would have been apparent at day 2 maybe?

    I can subscribe the idea of oxidation, but I would like to rule a lot out as well. Can you hypothesis any other reasons?

    We use priming sugar during bottling.

    Does anyone on the forum know if an 5 micron (actual) filter would/could filter out chlorine/chloromine?


     
  8. Hogue2112

    Hogue2112 Initiate (0) Apr 7, 2016 Ohio

    I do use an autosiphon. Very carefully pump it though, to avoid the bubble possibilities.

    We only have one bottling bucket - and have read a few things about infections popping up from poor cleaning of the siphon, etc. So we have avoided primary there.

    The Lemon Lime Hefe we just brewed is going to be our first "leaving it in the primary" attempt.

    It seems that people are very polarized on transferring to secondaries or not.
     
  9. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    I have no science to support that the effects of oxidative processes can be noticed so quickly but that is because the science I am aware of is for beer which has lower levels of packaged oxygen. Maybe if you really screwed up and introduced a 'boatload' of oxygen both during the transfers and the actual bottling process you would notice it at day 9?
    No, I am sorry that I can't. Everything you have described is consistent with "hop fade" that occurs as a result of oxidative processes.
    Me too.

    Cheers!
     
  10. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    I would suggest that there is little polarization on BA on this topic: do not conduct a secondary unless you absolutely have to (I gave examples above).

    Cheers!
     
    Naugled likes this.
  11. Naugled

    Naugled Pooh-Bah (1,944) Sep 25, 2007 New York
    Pooh-Bah

    If it's just a particulate filter you won't be removing any chlorine/chloramines. An activated charcoal filter will remove chorine, but you will need to use other methods like campden for chloramines.

    Do you have a water report for your municipal water? I think it's time for you to start paying attention to your water.
     
    Hogue2112 and JackHorzempa like this.
  12. scottakelly

    scottakelly Maven (1,487) May 9, 2007 Ohio

    It sounds like you brew with a partner? If that's the case you can do what I do when I do bottle, ie have my wife hold my siphon in the primary while I bottle. No bottling bucket needed.

    My issue with the auto siphon isnt during the "pumping". When I use one I see bubbles throughout the cane during the entire transfer. Just make sure you see no bubbles at all during the whole process
     
  13. drink1121

    drink1121 Initiate (0) Mar 23, 2009 California

    I can attest to swift oxidation do to bottling in my beers. Every beer that I keg has come out much better than any version of that beer that I bottled. If I were you, I would invest in a kegging system with a kegerator. this will run you like $500-1,000, but totally worth it in the end. either way, you dont need secondary. like you said, just get more 6.5 gallon carboys so you dont have to unnecessarily take your beers out of primary.
     
  14. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    I have been homebrewing for over 20 years. I will be brewing batch number 375 in a few days. All of those beers have been bottled and I have never had issues with "swift oxidation". I have consumed beers that have been years in the bottle.

    What exactly was your problem with oxygen ingress while bottling?

    Cheers!
     
    A2HB and Hogue2112 like this.
  15. SFACRKnight

    SFACRKnight Grand Pooh-Bah (3,348) Jan 20, 2012 Colorado
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    On the topic of chloramine, use the campden tablets. My carbon block filters cannot remove it, it is cheap insurance my friend.
     
  16. drink1121

    drink1121 Initiate (0) Mar 23, 2009 California

    It wasnt scross the board but happened way too often for my liking. hasnt happened while kegging yet and I bottle of the keg, now. all is good!!
     
  17. PapaGoose03

    PapaGoose03 Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,057) May 30, 2005 Michigan
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah

    I don't have an opinion yet about whether it might be oxidation as your problem, but I'll take another option as a potential reason for this off-flavor. Instead of 'medical/sterile taste' would you also describe the taste as banana or bubble gum? I think these tastes are similar and can be mixed-up when describing them. If so, then fermentation temps can enter into this picture as a reason for the off-taste. Here's a link to How To Brew's section on off flavors that might help you decide what you are tasting.
    http://howtobrew.com/book/section-4/is-my-beer-ruined/common-off-flavors
     
  18. Hogue2112

    Hogue2112 Initiate (0) Apr 7, 2016 Ohio


    It's definitely not banana, but it could possibly be bubblegum. I will have to drink another one (what a shame...) and reanalyze. My palate has since forgotten the taste completely.
     
  19. Hogue2112

    Hogue2112 Initiate (0) Apr 7, 2016 Ohio

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.