Conical fermenter & Yeast

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by redgorillabreath, Dec 18, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. redgorillabreath

    redgorillabreath Zealot (511) Mar 29, 2015 Pennsylvania

    Thought I'd check the group for any advice to make a process improvement.

    I use a 15 gallon conical fermenter. There's a port on the bottom, and also a sampling port that's about 1 gallon up from the bottom. Since I want to recover every beer atom of homebrew, I fill my bottling bucket from the bottom port.

    I do a very inconsistent job of "clearing" the yeast from the fermenter, with the issue being a couple of occasions where even after a little dance of stirring, waiting, and draining, I still ended up with gravy for the first 5 gallons into the bottling bucket. Eventually it settles in the bottles and it's not the end of the world, but I sure would rather not have some bottles with a ton of unnecessary yeast in the bottom.

    Is the best solution to just use the sample port, or is there a procedure/technique out there that solves the problem reliably?

    Many thanks and Cheers!!!
     
  2. Granitebeard

    Granitebeard Zealot (549) Aug 24, 2016 Maine

    I would not mind knowing which fermenter you have to start, so I can at least see what you are talking about. But second, I would like to ask: why are you stirring the contents of a fermenter before before racking to a bottling bucket?
     
  3. rocdoc1

    rocdoc1 Savant (1,215) Jan 13, 2006 New Mexico

    There is no way to avoid wasting a little beer. If you clear the deposited yeast and trub after about a week, you'll lose some beer, and when you finish fermenting there will still be yeast in the cone. If you use the racking port without draining the cone there's gonna be gunk in the cone that will get into your beer and you'll still leave beer in the cone. My process has always been to drain the cone halfway through fermentation(before it hardens into thick sludge) and fill from the racking port, turning it slowly as the fermenter empties until I am sure the yeast isn't filling the kegs. But even before i do any of this I make myself understand that out of an 11 gallon batch I will get 10 gallons of drinkable beer and I'm cool with that. Hope this helps
     
  4. redgorillabreath

    redgorillabreath Zealot (511) Mar 29, 2015 Pennsylvania

    I have a 15-gallon Minibrew...
    https://minibrew.com/products/15-gallon-conical-fermenter-f15xe

    The reason I stir is that yeast drops and lands all over the cone. I stir once to knock it to the bottom, drain it out, add whatever “sugar” I’m using for carbonation, and then drain.
     
  5. redgorillabreath

    redgorillabreath Zealot (511) Mar 29, 2015 Pennsylvania

    It does indeed get pretty thick.

    I was concerned that, in the end, the solution would include chucking some beer. :grimacing: It sounds pretty logical, though.

    So by the sound of it, your sample port is about 1 gallon up from the bottom also?

    Cheers!!!
     
  6. rocdoc1

    rocdoc1 Savant (1,215) Jan 13, 2006 New Mexico

    I've never measured it, that might be depressing. Of course if you leave it full of trub and yeast then the level of liquid is higher and there's less waste, but more chance of getting yeast into the kegs. Another consideration is whether you're going to rack fresh wort onto that yeast cake as soon as you drain the fermenter. Back when i was a much more serious brewer/drinker I would brew 3 or 4 beers before I emptied everything and cleaned the fermenter-I started with something like 1.050 brown or pale ale, and the last beer would be a 1.100 monstrosity. I would always bump the trub/yeast after 3 or 4 days to keep the b=debris to a minimum
     
    redgorillabreath likes this.
  7. the_owl

    the_owl Initiate (0) Feb 21, 2019 New Mexico

    On a side not that seems like a lot of head space for a 5 gallon brew.
     
  8. CShell1234

    CShell1234 Initiate (0) Oct 25, 2018 New York

    I have 2 questions...

    1. How do you like that fermenter? It looks like an awesome transition from carboys without the price and overwhelming gadgets and parts of a stainless conical

    2. @the_owl or anyone, wouldn’t the head space fill with CO2 and not be a problem as long as the liquid to head space ratio isn’t ridiculous? Would this particular ratio in question fall under too ridiculous?

    Also, my 2 cents on the matter so I don’t completely jack the thread, with the caveat that I have no experience with conicals... I would assume you would want to empty the beer from the top port... there is always going to be some beer mixed in the cone with the yeast that you’re going to have to sacrifice and be ok with it
     
  9. redgorillabreath

    redgorillabreath Zealot (511) Mar 29, 2015 Pennsylvania

    1- It’s been working out extremely well. I built a sort of dolly that lets me roll it around with a full batch in it. Only one thing to clean instead of two carboys.

    2- I normally go for a batch size of 11-12 gallons, which puts the krausen just about to the top.

    Moving on...

    I’ve had mixed results with “clearing” the yeast. If I can do it consistently, life will be good.

    What I haven’t done is put new wort on the yeast cake. I don’t think I’ve ever used the same yeast in back to back batches, mainly because I try to keep somewhat of a variety of beer in inventory.
     
  10. Granitebeard

    Granitebeard Zealot (549) Aug 24, 2016 Maine

    I guess the stirring part still seems weird to me. How long do you wait after stirring? I would wait a day or two to let everything settle out. If you are dropping out that much yeast/trub I would wonder if you are over pitching or something, but can't say for sure. Have you tried draining some trub from the bottom port before?

    For 2, yes and no. If it is a 5 gal batch I would worry about the head space. But if he is doing 10 gal batches, then he should be OK.
     
  11. rocdoc1

    rocdoc1 Savant (1,215) Jan 13, 2006 New Mexico

    I'm sure he makes more than 5 gallons-I made 11 gallon batches in my 12.5 gallon conical so I would end up with 2 5 gallon kegs. I might then add different dry hops to each keg to get 2 different IPA's
     
  12. wasatchback

    wasatchback Pooh-Bah (1,574) Jan 12, 2014 Tajikistan
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    You have a conical fermenter that holds 15 gallons and you don’t keg?
     
  13. redgorillabreath

    redgorillabreath Zealot (511) Mar 29, 2015 Pennsylvania

    For clarity, I’m not doing 5-gallon batches. :grin:
     
  14. redgorillabreath

    redgorillabreath Zealot (511) Mar 29, 2015 Pennsylvania

    I almost never keg. If I had a keezer, and made mainly IPAs and similar, then I’d certainly consider it more. So I get north of 4 cases per batch. One of those cases is set aside for aging and sharing samples. Otherwise, I like having 4 or 5 to choose from. There are even days where I don’t have a beer!
     
  15. riptorn

    riptorn Pooh-Bah (1,776) Apr 26, 2018 Georgia
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    If I’ve followed this correctly……
    Ferment
    Yeast flocculates
    Stir because some of it sticks to the side of the cone and doesn’t slide down
    Let the yeast settle (as @Granitebeard asked, how long?)
    Pull yeast from the bottom dump valve
    Add priming solution to the MiniBrew conical (and presumably stir again)
    Bottle your beer via the bottom dump valve
    Then it’s pretty much smooth sailing

    Since you prime in the MiniBrew, have you considered isinglass to help the yeast settle? I haven’t used it, but there’s plenty of reading to suggest it’s effective. Maybe someone with first-hand experience will chime in.
    Can you cold-crash? Maybe gelatin, or just time and temperature are your friends.
    If you have the means to transfer to a bottling vessel (via the racking/testing port) you could prime during transfer. But I suspect that goes against one of the reasons you got the MiniBrew.

    Inspect the surface of your cone. Maybe there’s a manufacturing defect on the surface of your cone, or a design flaw that escaped their QC. Might be worth a shot to contact MiniBrew to see if there are any known issues.
     
    redgorillabreath and PapaGoose03 like this.
  16. Brewday

    Brewday Zealot (721) Dec 25, 2015 New York

    redgorillabreath likes this.
  17. redgorillabreath

    redgorillabreath Zealot (511) Mar 29, 2015 Pennsylvania

    This is pretty cosmic. I’d been thinking about how to build this. I think this may be the solution.
     
  18. riptorn

    riptorn Pooh-Bah (1,776) Apr 26, 2018 Georgia
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Well, I didn’t follow correctly. I overlooked your bottling bucket comment….twice. Brewdays extended diptube/racking arm is probably the ticket, especially if it rotates.

    This link has a decent breakdown of a DIY rotating racking arm that was installed in a plastic conical.
     
    redgorillabreath likes this.
  19. redgorillabreath

    redgorillabreath Zealot (511) Mar 29, 2015 Pennsylvania

    Indeed, this looks like the way to go! I think it’s my destiny.

    I’ll be able to harvest yeast from the bottom port, stir I’m the carb sugar, let it sit for a bit, and fill my bottling bucket (twice) from the sample port equipped with the dip tube.

    Thanks for the input all!!!
     
  20. redgorillabreath

    redgorillabreath Zealot (511) Mar 29, 2015 Pennsylvania

    I’ve never considered doing this. Just to make sure I understand correctly, you’re dumping the yeast out of the bottom 3 or 4 days in? The implication being that the “dumped” yeast isn’t really needed to completely attenuate?

    Cheers!!!
     
    rocdoc1 likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.