Dead Yeast, last minute help

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by zac16125, Jan 12, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    I dislike false accusations. That's all I have to say about it.
     
    barfdiggs and GreenKrusty101 like this.
  2. jmw

    jmw Initiate (0) Feb 4, 2009 North Carolina

    Your point has been made. I'm sorry you were hurt.
     
  3. Marshall_ofmcap

    Marshall_ofmcap Initiate (0) Jul 17, 2013 Colorado

    ...that being said, OP has fermentation begun yet?
     
    Eriktheipaman likes this.
  4. MLucky

    MLucky Initiate (0) Jul 31, 2010 California

    Good grief. I wrote, "There are a lot of good books on brewing, but this is the best single source I know of." I would say that hardly qualifies as "flippant" nor does it recommend Palmer as a "be all end all" or even a "necessity." But then, nobody was recommending the OP drain pour this batch, either. And I don't see any indication he ever considered it.
     
    VikeMan likes this.
  5. jmw

    jmw Initiate (0) Feb 4, 2009 North Carolina

    Not singling you out MLucky, just the first one I came across chronologically.

    You boys are very touchy about the use of superlatives. Shall we discuss it some more?
     
  6. MLucky

    MLucky Initiate (0) Jul 31, 2010 California

    We're not being touchy. You exaggerated to such an extent that what you were saying was not true. And we called you on it.
     
  7. zac16125

    zac16125 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,432) Jan 26, 2010 South Carolina
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    Yes, the good news is fermentation is alive and well. Lots of action going on! So the yeast certainly wasn't dead. One obstacle down, now the potential contaminate is the only thing to worry about.
     
  8. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    I don't think there was ever any reason to doubt that fermentation would happen.

    I wouldn't worry much about infection with this beer. First, if it's going to happen, there's nothing you can do to fix it retroactively, so why worry? Second, people were making homebrew before anyone knew anything about sanitation. Sanitation simply reduces the risk of a harmful infection. Getting a little non-boiled tap water in your wort doesn't guarantee that a harmful infection will happen. The risk is greater, but still small.
     
  9. jlordi12

    jlordi12 Pooh-Bah (1,856) Jun 8, 2011 Massachusetts
    Pooh-Bah

    What about hose water my immersion chiller had a small leak at the connection point the other day?
     
  10. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Same thing basically. That's assuming the hose didn't have something significant growing in it. Which it wouldn't if there isn't much to eat.

    ETA: How long does your hose sit between uses? Some bugs can take up residence in stagnant water, but I'm not sure if any of the brewing relevant ones do.
     
  11. jlordi12

    jlordi12 Pooh-Bah (1,856) Jun 8, 2011 Massachusetts
    Pooh-Bah

    I had used it same day but before that it might have been a bit
     
  12. Loganyoung

    Loganyoung Initiate (0) Jul 16, 2011 Georgia

  13. epk

    epk Pundit (849) Jun 10, 2008 New Jersey

    +1. I'm pretty sure some people don't think twice about topping off with tap water anyway if that's all that is available. I did it when I couldn't go full boil. Beer turned out just fine.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.