Do I have to secondary for infusions?

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by DimensionX, Jul 24, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. DimensionX

    DimensionX Initiate (0) Oct 1, 2010 Oregon

    So I've had a Belgian Dark Strong Ale in primary for the last 3 weeks and things are looking good. I added 6oz of dark chocolate infused with red chilis to the end of the boil.
    2 of these to be exact
    [​IMG]
    The chocolate is coming through nicely and there is a mellow hint of spice at the back end but like any bad home brewer I would like to kick things up a notch by adding some more chilis and more chocolate. This beer will eventually become Christmas presents for friends and family so a few months in the bottle is next for this guy.

    I was planning to switch to secondary and do these additions but do I really need to? can I just add these (cocao nibs and cooked red chilis) straight to the primary? I'm thinking 7 days on the chocolate and 3-4 for the chilis.

    Cheers!
     
  2. premierpro

    premierpro Savant (1,060) Mar 21, 2009 Michigan

    I do not see any reason that you could not do this. I do not let any beer sit on the yeast over 5 weeks. Normaly 3 weeks. Good luck.
     
  3. mattbk

    mattbk Savant (1,111) Dec 12, 2011 New York

    you dont need to add these additions to a secondary fermenter. but, you would preserve more flavor if you added them to your primary after the primary fermentation period was over versus adding them in the boil. a lot of flavors get scrubbed away by the CO2 released during primary fermentation.
     
  4. DimensionX

    DimensionX Initiate (0) Oct 1, 2010 Oregon

    Cool, I'm basically just trying to get out of racking. 4 weeks in primary then straight to bottles. I was thinking that by adding my flavor infusions to the boil and fermentation that they would be better integrated into the beer and stick around longer.
     
  5. JohnSnowNW

    JohnSnowNW Initiate (0) Feb 6, 2013 Minnesota

    IMHO there are only two circumstances in which a secondary should be used:

    1. Clearing
    2. Long-term aging

    Otherwise, try to avoid it if possible. You only open yourself up for infection or oxidation.
     
    DimensionX likes this.
  6. clearbrew

    clearbrew Initiate (0) Nov 3, 2009 Louisiana

    This may be where some of the "need for secondary" comes from.
    Personally, I would only move to a secondary if you are adding something highly fermentable after primary fermentation is done. In your case I don't think it would be necessary.
    http://www.howtobrew.com/section1/chapter10-3.html
     
    DimensionX likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.