Does pH adjustment make a better tasting beer?

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by Shawn3997, Jan 28, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Shawn3997

    Shawn3997 Initiate (0) Aug 25, 2016 Arkansas

    If I buy a pH meter and adjust the pH during the mash am I going to get an appreciably better tasting beer?
     
  2. GreenKrusty101

    GreenKrusty101 Initiate (0) Dec 4, 2008 Nevada

    Depends on what else you are fastidious about :slight_smile:
     
  3. Shawn3997

    Shawn3997 Initiate (0) Aug 25, 2016 Arkansas

    Well, I have a stir-plate and an O2 wand and temperature control and I do all-grain beers with charcoal filtered water... I'm guessing pH adjustment is the next step to better beer?
     
  4. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Conducting a mash within the proper pH range will obtain 'better' mash performance (i.e., better mash conversion efficiency, etc.). I am not sure how to comment from a flavor perspective.

    Cheers!
     
    dmtaylor and PapaGoose03 like this.
  5. minderbender

    minderbender Initiate (0) Jan 18, 2009 New York

    Yeah, I guess my response is... sure, pH adjustment is good, but it depends a little on how on top of water adjustments you are in general. Are you using a spreadsheet to calculate appropriate salt additions to achieve a good mash pH and the flavor ions that you desire? If not, my feeling is that that would be lower-hanging fruit. If you're already doing that, then I think measuring pH could be useful at the margin. From the way you frame your question, it seems as though maybe you're not big into water adjustments, in which case my view is that you would get more bang for your buck by focusing on water chemistry in the abstract rather than specific pH adjustments.

    [Edited to add: Here's an attempt to be more helpful. My view is that a pH meter is a "nice to have," and that you absolutely don't need one to make excellent beer. Personally, I put a lot of faith in the models that underlie the various speadsheets you might see (Bru'nWater, BrewCipher). If you're diligently planning your water adjustments based on your malt bill, your local water reports, etc., then I believe you are already doing enough in terms of mash pH. pH meters aren't cheap and they aren't particularly durable. You would have to be pretty far along the quality curve before I would actually recommend buying a pH meter as a way of improving your beer. Others may disagree.]
     
    #5 minderbender, Jan 28, 2017
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2017
    PortLargo likes this.
  6. zizouandyuki

    zizouandyuki Initiate (0) Nov 26, 2015 Texas

    pH adjustment alone won't make great beer, but improved water chemistry is essential to getting the most out of your efforts in nearly every other aspect of the process.

    I'm fortunate to get regular guidance from a brewmaster at a brewery that puts out 45k+ barrels per year. His first two pieces of advice to me were:

    1) Invest in a way to control fermentation your temperature
    2) Learn and perfect your water chemistry
     
    PapaGoose03, skivtjerry and PortLargo like this.
  7. barleyhead

    barleyhead Devotee (329) Jun 5, 2008 New Jersey

    +1 for the spreadsheets. I only use my pH meter for verification now. The pH of every mash after adjusting the water chemistry based on the spreadsheets came in as expected. Of course you need to know about the water you are starting with. For that I use a LaMotte BrewLab water test kit.
     
    GreenKrusty101 likes this.
  8. Shawn3997

    Shawn3997 Initiate (0) Aug 25, 2016 Arkansas

    Last weekend I went out to a pizza/brew place and they had someone's locally-brewed doppelbock, which is my favorite kind of beer. It had a bitter undertone to it that couldn't have been from hops. It had to be from some water adjustment stuff -- I didn't like it. After that I ordered an "American Ale" which you'd expect to be a little more bitter from the hops and have a hoppy nose, but otherwise be a clean beer. It had an even more aggressive bitter taste that I *really* didn't like that again but little in the way of a hops taste.

    I'm reticent to start chucking lots of stuff in my beers because of this. Perhaps I'm just super sensitive to this kind of bitter. Either way I'd like to be able to test how the brewing salts taste in my beers before adding them and hoping I didn't screw up 5 gallons of otherwise good beer. Like take 12 oz. of finished beer and then start adding tiny amounts to get what I like, then scaling up to a whole batch. I've never heard of anyone doing this so I'm not sure it can be done.

    That's why I was thinking perhaps pH adjustments would help me out, like before I try to tackle this whole water treatment vs. my taste buds issue.
     
  9. minderbender

    minderbender Initiate (0) Jan 18, 2009 New York

    Calcium chloride and calcium sulfate are both quite soluble in beer, so I don't see why you couldn't add them to the finished beer in the manner you describe. The bigger obstacle would be accurately measuring such small quantities (it would be a tiny fraction of a gram per glass of beer).

    That said, I think there is essentially zero risk of inadvertently adding a bitter flavor to your beer through salt additions, if you calculate them properly. You could conceivably perceive an unpleasant bitterness if you add too much sulfate, but chloride presents no such danger. And even sulfate really shouldn't cause any problems unless it is used in extreme proportions. My advice would be to read up a little on water adjustments (How to Brew has a good discussion), and then make conservative adjustments to your next batch. Don't go crazy and try to replicate Burton levels of minerals, just make modest adjustments to dial in an appropriate mash pH and an appropriate level of the flavor ions. I predict you will not experience any unpleasant bitter flavors.
     
    GreenKrusty101 likes this.
  10. GreenKrusty101

    GreenKrusty101 Initiate (0) Dec 4, 2008 Nevada

    This pH measurement/infatuation thing has really gotten out of hand...most grains and water (mashes) will be in the ballpark with minimal intervention if just the most basic procedures are followed...rdwahahb. This can be rocket science if you want it to be...but it doesn't really need to be to brew excellent beer, imho. :slight_smile:
     
  11. Shawn3997

    Shawn3997 Initiate (0) Aug 25, 2016 Arkansas

    Hrm. Hard to measure alone but perhaps if I made a solution I could add the salts in by milliliter or something. I like that idea. I will try that on this next beer, I think.

    On this same thread, I just got through (today) putting a 100% Maris Otter + EKG SMASH into a fermenter and I got rather less efficiency than I usually do which I think might be due to the pH being too high. BeerSmith put a red dot next to estimated pH which is what made me think of that possibly being the issue.
     
  12. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    A mash that is not within the proper pH range (e.g., 5.2 - 5.8 or so) can impact conversion efficiency. I stated this in my first post of this thread.

    Cheers!
     
  13. skivtjerry

    skivtjerry Pooh-Bah (1,865) Mar 10, 2006 Vermont
    Pooh-Bah

    A pH meter is a valuable tool. I no longer use mine at every step of the process because I know what to expect from the initial readings. You have to start somewhere though. The cheapo meters from e.g. Milwaukee are really quite accurate (I compare mine to a bench meter at work). Their lifetime is only a year or two but at 30 bucks or so it hardly matters.

    The first thing you need to do though is to find out what your water chemistry is. If you have municipal water the utility should be able to tell you. For well water, a few bucks spent on analysis is a good investment. At least check your hardness with a test stick if you don't want to pay a lab. If the primary bedrock in your area is limestone you probably have hard, alkaline water that will benefit from some acid. Some trial and error will be required.

    The short answer to your initial question is "probably, but it's complicated."
     
  14. dmtaylor

    dmtaylor Savant (1,149) Dec 30, 2003 Wisconsin

    Many of us tend to overthink things.

    Brulosophy just ran a taste exBeeriment regarding mash pH a week or so ago. Guess what they found..... They did in fact see significant gravity differences.

    I shoot for a range of 5.2-5.5. This is more for optimal mash conditions for the enzymes than for anything else.
     
  15. invertalon

    invertalon Pooh-Bah (2,249) Jan 27, 2009 Ohio
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    I believe my beer quality has improved significantly once I start working with water, especially for lighter styles (IPA's included). It's not difficult with tools like Bru'n Water, as long as you know your base water (send it off to Ward for $26 or whatever...) and you are all set.

    I tend to go lower pH for light styles with a target about 5.2-5.3... Darker beers I target a higher pH of 5.3-5.5... This has worked for me very well.

    The Brulosophy experiment is interesting though... As it appears higher mash pH may lead to higher attenuation (which jives with what I have experienced personally).. Could be a good tool for drying a beer out further beyond mash temp and grist composition.
     
  16. OldBrewer

    OldBrewer Maven (1,385) Jan 13, 2016 Canada (ON)

    As someone said, most grains have a tendency to provide the right amount of pH regardless of what the water pH is. I don't worry too much about it and have no intention on purchasing an expensive pH meter that constantly requires expensive chemicals and replacement probes. The pH of our municipal water is a little high, so I just routinely add a quarter pound of aciduated malt to my recipes. Occasionally I will check the mash pH with inexpensive pH papers. They might not be overly accurate, but should be in the ballpark.
     
    dmtaylor likes this.
  17. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    This is not true. Most grain bills combined with most water will not land you in the optimal (say 5.2 to 5.6) pH range. I'll even go out on a limb and say that more often than not, the pH will be too high (more often than too low). But it all depends on the grain bill and the water. Just as an example, pilsner malt in distilled/RO water will (at 1.5 quarts per lb) produce a pH of over 5.7. Substitute another water profile (that might reasonably be expected to come out of someone's tap) with some alkalinity, and it gets worse. Adding Crystal Malts and other toasted/roasted malts will bring the pH down, but there is no chemical imperative driving things in general toward the optimal range.

    Put a slightly different way... whatever your starting water looks like, there are certainly some grain bills (think styles) that will hit the sweet spot for pH with that water, but there will be more grain bills that don't.

    I agree that the starting water's pH isn't really relevant. But its buffers and Ca/Mg content definitely are.

    ETA: Meant to mention...I agree with what's been said about using a mash pH model you can trust being more important than buying a pH meter.
     
    utahbeerdude likes this.
  18. GreenKrusty101

    GreenKrusty101 Initiate (0) Dec 4, 2008 Nevada

    Which is why most pale beers get some Acid Malt and Dark/Caramel beers get some Baking Soda when using RO water,imho.
     
  19. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    I agree those additions move pH in the right direction. But re-reading the thread, I think @OldBrewer oversimplified what you meant. It was him I was replying to.
     
  20. OldBrewer

    OldBrewer Maven (1,385) Jan 13, 2016 Canada (ON)

    Well, I actually also mentioned adding half a pound of aciduated malt to ensure that the PH goes down enough to be in the right ballpark. Also, checking it with pH papers (plastic papers are better) is also a lot less expensive than purchasing a pH meter.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.