Dud Wyeast Liquid Yeast Packet? - Help Desperately Needed

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by dmvanmeveren, Oct 15, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. dmvanmeveren

    dmvanmeveren Initiate (0) Apr 10, 2014 South Dakota

    Hey guys, today was brew day for my BIAB one-gallon hybrid all-grain Vienna ale fermented with Wyeast's Whitbread Ale liquid packet in a glass carboy. I smacked the yeast pack and let it rest for approximately 20 minutes and dumped the sanitized contents into a 500ml yeast starter with 2oz LME and 1 tsp of Yeast Energizer, (but I did not put it on a stir plate, though I did give it a vigorous shake)- and even after a few hours I noticed no krausen or activity whatsoever inside the Erlenmeyer flask. After the mash, boil, cool process, it was time to pitch and I just assumed that the yeast would do what it was meant to- I pitched the starter into my one gallon batch, topped it, and threw a sanitized air-lock on it. I then gave the carboy a vigorous shake to oxygenate the wort. Immediately I noticed the yeast sank to the bottom of the carboy and after 4 hours of monitoring, I have noticed zero flocculation activity and there are no bubbles coming through the air-lock. It is also approximately 75 degrees in my apartment.

    I performed a 90 minute mash at 152 degrees, and a 60 minute vigorous boil so I know there must be fermentable sugars in the wort, and I added an additional shot of yeast energizer at the pitching of the yeast.

    Did I get a dud yeast packet? :slight_frown:

    What, if anything, can I do?
     
  2. abelapophis

    abelapophis Initiate (0) Jun 8, 2014 California

    Give it more time, I wouldnt worry about there being no APPARENT activity at the 4 hour mark.
     
  3. Sqhead

    Sqhead Initiate (0) Jul 5, 2007 New Jersey
    Trader

    I agree. Be patient and you will see activity within 24 hours.
     
  4. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,055) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    As others said, it's too soon to worry. But I would recommend reading up on yeast starters. The Mr. Malty site would be a good starting place. If I read your post correctly, you started a starter, then pitched that into your beer wort a few hours later, which doesn't give the starter enough time to do what it's supposed to, i.e. propagate more cells.

    Flocculation is when yeast clump together and sink to the bottom. It's what happens roughly after the food runs out.

    The yeast will love 75F. But for most styles/yeast strains, that's really too warm, because 75F means ~80F fermentation temperature, which will increase esters and possibly fusel alcohols. You should look into temperature control, even cheap/rudimentary temp control. There are lots of threads about it. Look up Swamp Cooler, for example.
     
  5. FATC1TY

    FATC1TY Pooh-Bah (2,564) Feb 12, 2012 Georgia
    Pooh-Bah

    It sounds like you don't quite understand the full reason for a starter. You need to give it a day atleast, and maybe another to crash it down and decant the spend oxidized "beer" from the flask before pitching it.

    You wouldn't notice any activity because you didn't give it enough time to even start fermenting.

    What temp was the starter when you pitched the yeast into it? It wasn't still super hot from boiling was it? Cooled down to fermentation temps?

    However, 1 smack pack, for a 1 gallon batch is plenty of yeast, and you could have just smacked the pack, allowed it to swell and "proof" if you will, and then pitched directly.

    As for adding it to your beer, I'd give it a bit of time. Freak out tomorrow if you don't see any signs.

    Also- 75* to ferment.. is going to be hot for that Whitbread yeast.

    Chances are, with enough yeast, if you didn't kill them in the starter depending on how you made it, you've probably already seen activity especially with those elevated temps.
     
  6. AlCaponeJunior

    AlCaponeJunior Grand Pooh-Bah (3,428) May 21, 2010 Texas
    Pooh-Bah

    Ebola Virus! Panic! Run around in circles!! Stock up on canned food, water, and ammo, quick!!! If there's a line at walmart, use your pepper spray!!!!

    Oh wait, wrong thread. :rolling_eyes:

    Yeast starter = good.

    75F fermentation temperature = fermenting wort > 75F That's bad.

    Sounds like you need a freezer/controller setup. For this brew I'd at least get a swamp cooler going.
     
  7. dmvanmeveren

    dmvanmeveren Initiate (0) Apr 10, 2014 South Dakota

    Hey guys thanks for all of your help so far! Yes, I cooled the yeast starter before adding the yeast and I understand that it needed more time to create more cells, but I imagined (apparently mistakenly) that even 4 hours of a starter would have given it that much of an extra oomph. I mean, the smack packs are supposed to work by themselves without a yeast starter, after all. And I know that 75 is a little warm; I have a mini-fridge set to approximately 64 degrees, but I wanted to see activity before moving the batch.

    I've given it an entire night, just checked it, and still no activity. The yeast visibly remains on the bottom of the carboy but looks like it is slowly creeping up the sides of the glass, but there are zero bubbles coming from the air-lock. I'll give it more time, but I'm pretty sad at the moment :slight_frown:

    Thanks again for the help everyone!
     
  8. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,055) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Smack Packs are not starters. All they do is feed a very small amount of sugars to the yeast so that you can determine if they are alive. Smack Packs don't increase cell counts (at least not significantly). Again, just to be clear...the purpose of a yeast starter is to increase the viable cell count, not to get the yeast "started."


    Still way too early to worry or be sad.
    BTW, is there a crusty looking ring around your fermenter, just above the surface of the wort?
     
  9. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,363) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    You pitched an entire smack pack into 1 gallon of wort. It would not surprise me that the fermentation is complete at this stage.

    “The yeast visibly remains on the bottom of the carboy…” is a possible indication that fermentation is done.

    I recognize that since you only have a gallon of ‘liquid’ but you could conduct a hydrometer reading to measure what gravity you have right now.

    Cheers!
     
    GreenKrusty101 likes this.
  10. MLucky

    MLucky Initiate (0) Jul 31, 2010 California

    A couple comments for your consideration:

    A yeast starter is generally not necessary for a one gallon batch. Unless you're talking about a very old package of yeast or a very high gravity wort, one package of yeast is going to be more than enough to ferment one gallon.

    When you make a yeast starter, it's usually difficult to observe fermentation. The most active period might last only an hour or two, so unless you're standing there watching it's easy to miss it. Best thing to do, IMO, is to make your starter and then allow 24-36 hours for it to ferment out. If you continue with one gallon batches, you will not (usually) need to make a starter. If you move on to larger batches, I would suggest making the starter a couple days in advance.

    It usually takes longer than four hours for fermentation to become apparent. This is highly dependent on temperature and other factors.

    As others have said, you probably want to do what you can to lower your fermentation temp down to ~68F for most ales.
     
    minderbender and GreenKrusty101 like this.
  11. dmvanmeveren

    dmvanmeveren Initiate (0) Apr 10, 2014 South Dakota

    The yeast sank to the bottom approximately 6 minutes after I had pitched it, and no CO2 was released during that time.

    I made the starter just to be certain that the yeast would be active, and in the future I will not use a smack pack and will make a longer yeast starter; thanks for the advice!
     
  12. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,055) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    It does that. But JackHorzempa's point was that some time after that, the yeast may have moved into suspension, did their thing, and flocculated. While you weren't looking. Possibly overnight. And that's certainly possible, given the small batch size and high temperature. That's why I asked about any crusty residue.
     
    GreenKrusty101 likes this.
  13. dmvanmeveren

    dmvanmeveren Initiate (0) Apr 10, 2014 South Dakota

    Zero krausen.

    There is zero floating, moving yeast activity.

    The bottom of the glass carboy looks like grey sludge.

    There is no air-lock activity.

    It's been approximately 16 hours since the yeast was pitched into the wort.
     
  14. AlCaponeJunior

    AlCaponeJunior Grand Pooh-Bah (3,428) May 21, 2010 Texas
    Pooh-Bah

    Ah I missed the one gallon thingie.

    No need to be too sad even if the worst case scenario takes place when you're only talking about one gallon of wort. It's only a gallon! However, a whole smak pak for one gallon is pretty overkill. I'd work towards a more appropriate method of getting the right amount of yeast into your beers. Way too much is bad, as is way too little. Which is worse, who knows, I don't know because I don't let it happen.
     
  15. dmvanmeveren

    dmvanmeveren Initiate (0) Apr 10, 2014 South Dakota

    I am just upset because this is the first batch I had made where all my procedures went perfectly. Every other batch I've made, I've made some mistake.

    To get way off topic, is a yeast starter for a lager different to prepare?

    It might be wiser for me to try my hand at lagers because I have my refrigerator and can maintain cold temperatures.

    Has anyone tried opposite yeast for a certain style?

    I'm thinking, like, lager yeast with an Imperial Stout or an IPA (IPL, I guess you'd call it)
     
  16. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,055) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Generally, you'll need a bigger starter for lagers than for ales.

    I'm assuming you're talking about a fridge that also contains food. Do you keep your food somewhere around 50F? If so, you could do a lager fermentation in it. But I wouldn't look at lager fermentation temperature control as being somehow simpler than ale fermentation temperature control.
     
  17. GreenKrusty101

    GreenKrusty101 Initiate (0) Dec 4, 2008 Nevada

    These forums are great for beginners, but I highly recommend How To Brew by Palmer to fill in the "holes".
     
  18. AlCaponeJunior

    AlCaponeJunior Grand Pooh-Bah (3,428) May 21, 2010 Texas
    Pooh-Bah

    I wouldn't even mess with lagers right now. You need temperature control first off. Proper starters and yeast pitching second. Fundamentals. Lagers are advanced. I was on like 50 batches of ales before I tried my first lager, and mind you I have a second freezer/controller setup dedicated just to lagers.

    Going funky with yeasts is advanced. I would suggest it's also inadvisable unless you really know what you are doing and why you are doing it. I mixed yeasts once and the result was a very so-so beer where had I simply used the yeast that had already worked great (four times) for that beer I would have had a very tasty beer.

    KISS. Fundamentals. Simplicity.

    And if you haven't read how to brew, that's first up.
     
  19. dmvanmeveren

    dmvanmeveren Initiate (0) Apr 10, 2014 South Dakota

    Yep, read it. It doesn't cover anything for BIAB or one gallon batches, though. I do have a 5 gallon mash tun, but I can't afford to make any mistakes with a batch that large.

    Everything that I did during the mash and boil went perfectly, and all was thoroughly sanitized. I just don't see why my batch isn't visibly fermenting yet.

    Batch update: there appear to be little patches of bubbles that have risen to the top of the carboy now, but there are still no bubbles erupting from the air-lock.
     
  20. minderbender

    minderbender Initiate (0) Jan 18, 2009 New York

    @MLucky already mentioned what I think are the most important things to bear in mind: (1) you almost certainly didn't need a starter, and (2) fermentation can be hard to observe in a starter (and for that matter, in a 1-gallon batch!) because it can happen very quickly and without much fuss.

    In the future, for 1-gallon batches, I wouldn't do a starter, and I also wouldn't worry if there is a 12- or 24-hour lag before fermentation is noticeable. Just use a packet of yeast that is likely to be healthy (not too old, not exposed to long periods of warm temperature). A starter is just another thing that can go wrong. (Also, do I understand correctly that you added the whole 500mL starter to your gallon of wort? That is a very high ratio of starter to wort, and most people would worry about off-flavors that the starter liquid might contribute. Yet another reason not to do a starter for small batches.)

    One more thing: your options aren't confined to 1-gallon batches or 5-gallon batches. I usually brew 2.5 to 3.5 gallons at a time, and I'm happy with it. It sounds as though your system could handle a 2.5 gallon batch, and I think you might be happy trying it out. At 2.5 gallons, even a somewhat high-gravity beer does not need a starter, by the way. And if you are just brewing simple ales (which can be bottled after 2-3 weeks in primary), then you can use a 5-gallon Better Bottle (which is what I would recommend) without difficulty. Only for long-term aging would that much head space create a problem.
     
    JackHorzempa likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.