Farmhouse Stout Ideas

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by andys_war_hall, Dec 2, 2014.

Tags:
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. andys_war_hall

    andys_war_hall Devotee (371) Dec 7, 2012 Texas

    Alright, so now time for some stupid questions if any one is still out there.

    I got this thing fermenting nicely and usually I would let it sit, take gravity readings and bottle when FG was hit. But with a beer this big, is that still a good plan?

    A lot of things I'm reading are mentioning racking to a secondary and I've never felt that was necessary unless you were dry hopping or adding something else. I've only got one carboy, and I'm not opposed to getting another one, but I'd rather not now if I don't have to.

    After I get it out of the primary I am planning on bottling it. Anyone have experience with bottle conditioning a RIS can chime in and let me know what worked best for you.

    Thanks.
     
  2. MrOH

    MrOH Grand Pooh-Bah (3,995) Jul 5, 2010 Virginia
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah

    The issue here isn't that its an RIS, its that you used 3711. What's the current gravity? With 3711 I'd say let it go a week between stable gravity readings to be sure that it has finished.
     
  3. andys_war_hall

    andys_war_hall Devotee (371) Dec 7, 2012 Texas

    Great point, and something I was thinking about as well. It has only been in the carboy since Monday, so I have not taken a gravity reading yet. Still bubbling a good bit. I figure I would give it at least two weeks and then take a sample. In the saison that I did with the 3711 it got down past where I wanted the FG to be in less than two weeks. So I know how voracious this yeast can be. I guess the fact that this is my first stout and I'm using an unconventional yeast, I wanted to make sure there was not something that I was missing. I was wanting to know if I could go about my normal process of watching the FG and then bottling it when it gets down to desired FG?
     
  4. A2HB

    A2HB Initiate (0) Oct 30, 2013 Michigan

    Bottle conditioning a RIS I have found that the longer you let it sit before you crack it the better it tastes. I made 9.7 RIS in October and I couldn't resist and tried it at the end of November and it had a real yeasty taste that was frankly disgusting. I tried it again at the end of December and that yeasty flavor had mellowed out significantly and that delicious stout flavor I was shooting for was a lot more prominent. I haven't had any since then but I'm sure the more and more I let it sit the better it is going to be. So at minimum I would suggest waiting at least 2 good months to taste your RIS for it to have a semblance of the flavors you're going for.
     
    andys_war_hall likes this.
  5. allouez86

    allouez86 Pundit (999) Jan 24, 2009 Wisconsin

    I was curious too about the Jester King recipe that they listed. Curious to see how your beer turns out. Another option that I've seen people do on dark saisons is to cold steep the roasted malts then add them at the boil which will help you avoid some of the harshness that comes with mashing these grains.
     
    andys_war_hall likes this.
  6. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    As far as I am concerned conditioning is conditioning. You can permit your beer to condition a bit in your primary for a week or two after it reaches final gravity. Or you could bottle you beer once it has reached final gravity and condition in the bottle.

    Your choice on how you prefer to proceed.

    Cheers!
     
    andys_war_hall likes this.
  7. andys_war_hall

    andys_war_hall Devotee (371) Dec 7, 2012 Texas

    So it looks like I am going to follow my standard procedure of watching FG and bottling when it is reached. As far as bottle conditioning goes, I like to open them at different points to see how the beer is developing. Thanks for the feedback, and I'll update on taste later.
     
  8. wspscott

    wspscott Pooh-Bah (1,958) May 25, 2006 Kentucky
    Pooh-Bah

    I see on the Jester King website that they list malts, but not percentages. What did you end up going with? Where do they say 3711 for yeast?

    Definitely keep this updated since it is a somewhat out there beer, curious to see how it ends up.
     
    andys_war_hall likes this.
  9. allouez86

    allouez86 Pundit (999) Jan 24, 2009 Wisconsin

    On Jester King's blog they list three recipes, Black Metal, Commercial Suicide, and Wytchmaker Rye IPA. All the percentages are given there as well as recommending 3711. It's been stated in a handful of publications and interviews that along with all of the bugs, brett and locally harvested yeast that they use, Jester King also uses the French Saison yeast strain from Brew Science Institute, which is similar to wyeast 3711.
     
    andys_war_hall and wspscott like this.
  10. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    From the Jester King website:

    “These are the percentages for Black Metal. Apply them how you would like to your homebrew set up!


    OG: 1.085, FG: 1.010-1.015


    77% Pale 2-Row
    5% Roasted Barley
    4% Chocolate Malt
    4% Black Malt
    2% Crystal 60L
    2% Crystal 120L
    2% Brown Malt
    4% Carafa III


    Hops: ~40 IBUs of Columbus @ 90mins


    - 90 minute boil

    - Primary fermentation with Wyeast 3711 (French Saison Yeast)”

    http://jesterkingbrewery.com/jester-king-homebrew-recipes#blackmetal

    Cheers!
     
    wspscott likes this.
  11. hoptualBrew

    hoptualBrew Initiate (0) May 29, 2011 Florida

    We do a Black IPA where we do the sachh rest without any dark grain and then sprinkle in on top the mash before the sparge. Just make sure sparge water is under 170F and pH is under 6.0 to decrease tannic extraction.
     
  12. andys_war_hall

    andys_war_hall Devotee (371) Dec 7, 2012 Texas

    Small update. It has been two weeks since brew day and I took my first gravity sample. It hit high on my target scale at 1.015, which is where I want it to be. I'm going to let it sit another week to clean up and then bottle. I had to try the sample, and I love it. I could not be more happy with it. I'll update again once I open the first bottle.
     
  13. MrOH

    MrOH Grand Pooh-Bah (3,995) Jul 5, 2010 Virginia
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah

    No no no nono. With that yeast, wait a week for a stable gravity reading before bottling. If it still reads 1.015 when you take a reading, by all means bottle it. Chances are, you're going to end up below 1.010 once its all said and done. 3711 is a beast.
     
    NiceFly and wspscott like this.
  14. wspscott

    wspscott Pooh-Bah (1,958) May 25, 2006 Kentucky
    Pooh-Bah

    I'm surprised it is that high after 2 weeks, but I would not assume it won't go lower. I would definitely take another reading before you bottle to make sure the gravity is stable before you bottle.
     
  15. andys_war_hall

    andys_war_hall Devotee (371) Dec 7, 2012 Texas

    I will take another reading before bottling maybe this week. I always get nervous taking gravity readings. The recipe calls for a FG of between 1.010- 1.015 so that is what I am shooting for. Not opposed to it going below that, but not really aiming for it. With the grain bill, any idea how it going lower than 1.010 would effect the flavor profile? Positive or negative?


    I may have under pitched. I made my first starter ever so it was a learning experience. I made a litter worth of 1.040 starter to pour my two 3711 smack packs in to, but was able to only add one due to space in the flask. So basically I made a litter starter with one, pitched that, and then pitched the second smack pack. That could be why it did not go lower.

    I'll man up and take that second gravity readying to make sure it has stabilized. Thanks!
     
  16. NiceFly

    NiceFly Initiate (0) Dec 22, 2011 Tajikistan

    3711 takes forever to finish. I did a 10 gal batch once that was split into 2 different fermentors. One I thought was finished at 1.010 and kegged it, the other I let sit for a few more weeks. The one that sat ended at 1.000 or therebouts.

    I realized you already brewed but here goes.

    I have used 3787 in a RIS quite a few times and it is difficult to get the yeast to express through a typical RIS grainbill. Just seems to get overpowered. My experience anyway, so I would go easy on the roast and such. Also, the phenolics do not jive well so if you know your yeast strain and can decrease the phenolic contribution I would take that approach.

    I also fermented one with Orval dregs. Weird beer. People either loved it or hated it there was no middle. I never could decide myself.
     
  17. wspscott

    wspscott Pooh-Bah (1,958) May 25, 2006 Kentucky
    Pooh-Bah

    Just Orval dregs? It does sound weird, can you describe what that ended up tasting like?
     
  18. MrOH

    MrOH Grand Pooh-Bah (3,995) Jul 5, 2010 Virginia
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah

    You could've just pitched one smack pack of 3711 straight, eventually it'd get down lower than expected (flavor is another story). So far as mouthfeel and low OG with that strain, the good thing is that 3711 produces a lot of glycerols, so it will retain a more full mouthfeel a beer of similar FG with a different strain. However, it may still seem a little thin. Just check and double check gravity before packaging, because you may end up with gushers or bombs if you bottle too early.
     
  19. andys_war_hall

    andys_war_hall Devotee (371) Dec 7, 2012 Texas

    You fermented a RIS with Orval Dregs? I must know how that turned out. I really want to do a small stout/porter with all Brett.
     
  20. NiceFly

    NiceFly Initiate (0) Dec 22, 2011 Tajikistan

    @andys_war_hall @wspscott
    Broke out the notebook, brewed April 2010. My how time flies.
    I pitched onto a cake of an Orval "clone". OG 97 FG 16. Two row, brown malt, flaked barley, some wheat some special roast and roasted barley.
    Full bodied for FG16. Some Soy/fish that seemed to subside over time but never go away. Sweetness with some funk. I remember it being very hard to describe which is probably what people loved or hated about it. I am not sure that helps very much but it was hard to describe.
     
    andys_war_hall and wspscott like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.