Feedback Question

Discussion in 'Trade Talk' started by goosebtb, Nov 28, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. goosebtb

    goosebtb Crusader (448) Jul 13, 2009 Colorado
    Trader

    Finished up a trade with someone earlier this month for a couple bottles of the most recent Damon release and a 6-pack of S&S #4 for a '18 Maman and EOC b2. Mine arrived safe and sound to him, but his box arrived with one side of the box clearly wet. Opened it up and the 6-pack had been left attached to the holder with a thin layer of bubble wrap around it pressed up against the side of the box. Half the cans were dented up and one of them was about half full due to some kind of leak. Damon bottles arrived ok (if a little wet from the S&S).

    Took pics and messaged the trader to let him know what happened and he responded that this had never happened before and would make it right. Offered to send a 4-pack of TH cans and I countered that maybe we could do a proxy Trillium for Weldwerks type thing swap where we each cover for the costs and shipping ( I pay for the Trillium and send label & vice versa) and he seemed receptive to that. This all happened on 11/3. I messaged 11/12 to follow up to see if he was willing with no response, though he did view the message. Tried him again 11/26 without a response and didn't view message.

    I left neutral feedback, but looking for opinions on whether this should've been negative?

    First time I've run into this where a person went dark after something went wrong with their shipment and never left neg feedback either. I get we're around the holidays and that it's only one lost can, but the lack of contact isn't cool as far as I'm concerned. Looking for people's thoughts, thanks!
     
  2. John_M

    John_M Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,849) Oct 25, 2003 Washington
    Mod Team Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    If I understand your post correctly, just one of the cans shipped to you by your trading partner was damaged. I gather it wasn't readily replaceable, and so he offered to send you a 4 pack of TH in it's place. I gather you then made some sort of counter offer that I'm having a difficult time deciphering, but whatever it was, it sounds like he agreed to it. Although agreeing to the counter offer, he never fulfilled his counter offer agreement, and he never did do anything to make up for the damaged S&S. Is that pretty much the gist of your post?

    Assuming that's the case, then it seems to me you would be fully justified in leaving negative feedback. Not only did he renege on his counter offer agreement, but he never did do anything to compensate for the damaged S&S. The fact he subsequently cut off all communication with you about your loss would seem to "seal the deal" in terms of the type of feedback I would leave if I was in your shoes.
     
    dmbforever, goosebtb and jhavs like this.
  3. goosebtb

    goosebtb Crusader (448) Jul 13, 2009 Colorado
    Trader

    That's correct, agreed to a scenario to fix the loss and then went lack of communication. Can we go back and update feedback or is it locked once submitted?
     
  4. John_M

    John_M Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,849) Oct 25, 2003 Washington
    Mod Team Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    I honestly don't know, as I've never used it. There's a lot of information about the feedback system in some of the Bad Trader threads, so there may be some information there that will answer your question (for some reason I seem to recall that there's a limited time frame in which you can change or edit your feedback, but I'm not positive about that). If it turns out you can't change/edit your feedback, I would suggest shooting @dmbforever a BM, as he's the expert when it comes to using the feedback system.
     
    dmbforever and goosebtb like this.
  5. Beer_Economicus

    Beer_Economicus Pooh-Bah (2,698) Apr 8, 2017 Ohio
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    If I can make a recommendation (trying to take a page from the ever-so-patient, kind, forgiving, and 'give the man the benefit of the doubt'er, @John_M ):

    @goosebtb Send the individual a PM saying that you are going to change your feedback to negative if he does not respond. Be polite, and reference this thread/send a link. This is very much like what the community/admins encourage people to do prior to posting a BT thread. Seems like such a PM would go a long way in a circumstance like this as well.
     
  6. John_M

    John_M Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,849) Oct 25, 2003 Washington
    Mod Team Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    FWIW, I happen to think this is an excellent idea. :sunglasses:
     
    Beer_Economicus likes this.
  7. jrnyc

    jrnyc Grand Pooh-Bah (3,012) Mar 21, 2010 New York
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    Would suck for someone to get bad feedback on one bad can, but if they don't follow-up and their communication is bad, they will get what the deserve. In this instance compared to other BT threads, you may want to be more lenient before pulling the bad feedback trigger.
     
    MattOC likes this.
  8. Rustytacos

    Rustytacos Initiate (0) Mar 19, 2018 California
    Trader

    The way I'm reading your response is that the trader was receptive to the idea, which btw was nice of you. But did he say yes to the idea of the proxy trading? Honestly looking back, you should have just taken the 4 pack of TH.
     
  9. goosebtb

    goosebtb Crusader (448) Jul 13, 2009 Colorado
    Trader

    @Beer_Economicus good idea. I'll pm him. Not sure if I can even change the feedback at this point, so may be moot. Thanks for the thoughtful response!

    @jrnyc I don't disagree and the loss of a single beer isn't the biggest deal in the world to me. More just his agreement to do the proxy thing and then going radio silence. Just not how someone should respond to their own shoddy packing job.

    @Rustytacos his response was the following: "I can mule Trillium, absolutely." That was the last response I received, so not a lot of ambiguity there (I don't think).
     
  10. Graffy

    Graffy Pundit (774) Jan 10, 2014 California
    Trader

    In my opinion the fact you are asking a trader to send anything for one can is ridiculous. One can got busted, drink the other 5 and move on with life. I'm sure this is an unpopular opinion but ive had this happen multiple times and never asked for anything back when its just a single can as part of a larger package. Then the trader offers you a 4 pack of treehouse to replace one HF can and you start negotiating with him on it, come on now
     
  11. goosebtb

    goosebtb Crusader (448) Jul 13, 2009 Colorado
    Trader

    Thanks for your thoughts, but I disagree. My offer was intended to eliminate any cost to him since it was simply one can. I offered to pay for the beer and send a label the next time he headed to Trillium and reciprocate to do the same for him for a brewery here in CO he might like to try for cost + label.

    Regardless, no response from him and feedback changed.
     
    Beer_Economicus likes this.
  12. bigda83

    bigda83 Crusader (453) Feb 13, 2014 New York
    Trader

    I'm with @Graffy on this one. Personally, I'd have just let them know what happened and still left positive feedback since I've encountered this before and did just that. The only time I'd insist on getting it fixed is if I only traded specifically for the can/cans. This seems like a 2:2 bottle trade and all I can think is maybe the $ was higher on the OP's side so the 6 pack was added in to make it $4$. If someone apologized and offered me a free 4 pack for the trouble then I'd have taken that and not came back with a counter. Obviously, this is just me and my opinion, but a free 4 pack seems generous and if someone did that for me and came through on it then I'd more than likely send them a thank you beer or two down the line for being about the issue.
     
    Rustytacos likes this.
  13. Beer_Economicus

    Beer_Economicus Pooh-Bah (2,698) Apr 8, 2017 Ohio
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    I think you guys are missing the point. This isn't about one can, it's about an agreement. OP let his trader know. His trader said, let me send you a 4-pack to make up for it! Sorry about that! OP then said, instead of you spending money, why don't we just do (effectively) another trade, where I'll send you whatever you want locally at cost+label, and you can do the same for me. The guy agreed.

    This would cost OPs trader nothing, and certainly less than the $20 for the TH 4-pack that he offered to send.

    OP didn't blackmail the trader and say, "You better do this or else!" He offered a reasonable solution that saved the guy money. The only reason this matters is because the guy agreed. Had he not, we probably would have never had this discussion for a whole number of reasons.
     
    goosebtb likes this.
  14. goosebtb

    goosebtb Crusader (448) Jul 13, 2009 Colorado
    Trader

    This is all accurate. Went back to look at the message history and he stated he would send the 4-pack of Treehouse to make up for it or could do something from Trillium. My response of going the Trillium route was to minimize any further cost to him and to figure something out that would benefit us both without further expense.

    The lost beer isn't really the issue, rather it's the offer to fix and then lack of communication from that point forward. I didn't ask for anything, just told him about the packing/leaking issue and he responded with a proposal to fix the issue with either Treehouse or Trillium. I held off on leaving feedback to give an opportunity to fix, which he never followed through on. I've since changed the original neutral feedback to negative primarily based on the communication here. IIget that packaging isn't always ideal, but any time I've run across this type of issue before the other trader has always followed thru. Always left positive feedback on those situations.

    Thanks all for the feedback on this.
     
  15. Graffy

    Graffy Pundit (774) Jan 10, 2014 California
    Trader

    I think your missing my point. I would have either not even mentioned the can or said one of the cans got busted and everything else arrived safely, no need to worry about the one damaged can. By telling the trader AND sending pictures you are inferring that you are expecting some sort of action to replace the damage can which i disagree with

    If OP had done what i said above there would be positive feedback left and we wouldn't be here. But now there is a situation where the other trader committed to something and ghosted which is an issue. Dont get me wrong, once the other trader committed to replacing the can or whatever he agreed to he should follow through on it

    I would just leave neutral feedback and explain the situation. Once again just providing my opinion and not saying I am right, its just one view
     
    bigda83 likes this.
  16. Beer_Economicus

    Beer_Economicus Pooh-Bah (2,698) Apr 8, 2017 Ohio
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    I understand that it is just your view, and I'm not trying to be antagonistic. I respect your view, but I think there are a few leaps here.

    I think if you receive damaged goods, the respectable thing is to take pictures and tell the person. Even if it is "all good, just letting you know," I would want the person to know that I'm being honest. OP never asked for a replacement, he just let him know. (Unless I misread the first post or am forgetting.) OPs trader then said "Oh, sorry, let me fix that!"

    I think you have to read into it kind of hard to say that if you send a picture, that means you're looking for the problem to be fixed by sending a replacement. Personally, if I sent a box (and I thought I packed it well), I would be pretty surprised if I was told that one can got punctured. A picture would be awesome.
     
    goosebtb likes this.
  17. goosebtb

    goosebtb Crusader (448) Jul 13, 2009 Colorado
    Trader

    I think I understand what you're saying and maybe we agree to disagree on the first part. I would personally want to be notified if there was an issue with a box I sent out and be given an opportunity fix, that's why I let him know of the issue. I never sent pics, but said I could in case he wanted to see what happened. I know if the shoe were on the other foot I would want to know.

    I'd also want to know so I can make sure it doesn't happen again. The packing in this instance was sloppy and that's the reason why the leaking issue occurred. Leaving a 6 pack of cans attached to the plastic holder and loosely wrapping with a single layer of small bubble wrap pressed up against the side of a box is cutting corners.

    My initial neutral feedback, which I didn't leave for a few weeks to allow for the situation we agreed to see itself through, was based on lack of communication/follow thru on his offer to fix. I'd of left positive feedback had he just followed through. The change to negative is due to the feedback I received above after giving him an additional chance to respond.

    Additionally, I disagree with the poster above saying these cans were to get to $4$. I think what I sent in the 2:2 was over on secondary and asked for the cans to cover that difference. That's my 2 cents on value though and I get that people value things differently. The cans were part of the primary trade (not extras), the trade would not have closed without them and needed to be delivered in good condition.
     
    Beer_Economicus likes this.
  18. bigda83

    bigda83 Crusader (453) Feb 13, 2014 New York
    Trader

    I didn't miss the point at all actually. My point is that a more than reasonable solution was offered already and then countered. Maybe I am missing some point though because I'm failing to see where money was saved? A four pack he probably had on hand, plus USPS flat rate, seems like it would be less than doing another trade where each does cost of beer plus label. He agreed to that so I get that it's now an issue and agree with that, just saying the original proposal was adequate.

    Again, I put in my response that it was my opinion and what I would have done, not what the OP should have done. I was just saying in that trade I most likely would have been after the Damons and the cans would have been extra. Since it's the same beer I'd have just said oh well I only have 5 cans now instead of 6. I'd have def told the trader and informed them of the issue, but would have just said it's cool. Everyone has views on this so I understand that mine is different and some may not agree with it and that's fine.
     
    Graffy likes this.
  19. bigda83

    bigda83 Crusader (453) Feb 13, 2014 New York
    Trader

    Sorry for double post, but I do agree on the packaging issue. For me, I either put a 4 or 6 pack in one of the 2 gallon bags with the holder on the cans still. Then lately I've had rubberbands so I'll wrap a couple around and then wrap in in bubble wrap. Just a single slice or two on loose cans like that is a problem because one little puncture and then you have the issue of the box getting soaked and everything else possibly confiscated.

    I only offer my thoughts because it's how I've done things before. I do that because a great trader on here actually did it for me before. I did a trade where I shipped a lambic all the way to the west coast and I packed it amazing. Well, the bottle leaked through the cork a bit, so he messaged me and let me know and sent pics. I felt terrible and asked him if I could send his box back since I didn't have another bottle. I even told him to drink it and see how it is and I'd still send all his beer back (since I assumed he most likely wanted to save that bottle). He actually drank it and said it tasted fine and ended up telling me to just keep his beer and it was ok. I thought that was really generous and probably asked way too many times if he was sure and that I had no problem sending all his beers back for the issue on my side.
     
    Graffy and Beer_Economicus like this.
  20. goosebtb

    goosebtb Crusader (448) Jul 13, 2009 Colorado
    Trader

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Here's the screens with his info redacted. Not sure how you conclude a more reasonable option was offered and I countered. My offer eliminated any expense to him by letting a guy living in Boston fix the issue by picking up beers I would pay for and ship using my label the next time he headed to Trillium. My "counter" was so he didn't have to send me his own beer and would give him the option of receiving CO beers at cost if he wanted. No obligation on that part though.

    Seems like we all have our ways of doing things. Additionally, I appreciate the anecdote of how a more experienced trader worked with you on your own situation. My "counter" to him was in a similar vein to work out something where we both win and he seemed to agree. Perhaps I was off on that considering he went dark. Lesson learned there I suppose.
     
    Beer_Economicus and bigda83 like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.