FG reading help

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by Liberatiscioli, Aug 13, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Liberatiscioli

    Liberatiscioli Initiate (0) Oct 3, 2013 Pennsylvania

    Heres the situation :

    Forgot to take a FG prior to adding priming sugar.

    NEIPA
    London 1318
    OG: 1.054

    FG 8/1/17 (3 days from pitching) 1.012ish

    FG today 8/12/17 (just got home from vacation) 1.02

    Here's what else we know:

    Used 1.25oz corn sugar to bottle prime 1.75gal

    Beer temp approx 75 degrees

    Tried using reminents of sludge and yeasty water at the bottom to get a reading which was all over the place.

    Is there any formula from the info provided to get an accurate FG?
     
  2. CarolusP

    CarolusP Zealot (590) Oct 22, 2015 Minnesota

    The carbonated beer after the priming sugar is eaten up will more or less give you what the FG was. Just make sure to pour the sample around a bit and let it sit for a while to flatten it out before taking a reading, because the carbonated sample will throw off your reading.
     
    PortLargo and Liberatiscioli like this.
  3. PapaGoose03

    PapaGoose03 Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,057) May 30, 2005 Michigan
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah

    Did you mean to say that your 8/12 reading was 1.020 or was it 1.002? To go from 1.012 up to 1.020 after 12 days says that one or both of your hydrometer readings are faulty. However, if it was down to 1.002, then you can't get much lower than that, so I'd consider 1.002 as your FG.
     
  4. Liberatiscioli

    Liberatiscioli Initiate (0) Oct 3, 2013 Pennsylvania

    Yes it defintely went up so something screwy is going on whether my fault or the hydrometers. Wish I knew which.
    e
     
  5. Liberatiscioli

    Liberatiscioli Initiate (0) Oct 3, 2013 Pennsylvania

    Here's a little more info from my notes:

    My 8/1/17 sample was from a blowoff popcorn bowl ( 3 ft hose , ripped violently within 12 hours ) sample looked like beer not much yeast mixed in if any.

    How would that affect things?
     
  6. Tebuken

    Tebuken Initiate (0) Jun 6, 2009 Argentina


    It is not enough corn sugar to carb up a 1.75 gal of NEIPA, you need twice that amount IMHO.
     
  7. PapaGoose03

    PapaGoose03 Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,057) May 30, 2005 Michigan
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah

    I just read this sentence again and realized what you were saying. Using some dregs in your FG reading will cause a high reading if a lot of that stuff was in suspension, so that's why the second reading was higher. I don't know if the typical NE IPA has a final gravity reading that is higher than the typical FG for standard IPAs, but with the extra turbidity of a NE IPA, it stands to reason that it would be. Therefore, your 1.012 reading is probably your actual FG reading because IPAs typically don't get much lower than that without some unusual tinkering with the recipe.
     
  8. Liberatiscioli

    Liberatiscioli Initiate (0) Oct 3, 2013 Pennsylvania

    Oh ,
    Well that opens up a new can of worms trying to figure out gravity on NEIPA if I'm reading your last quote correctly.

    Any thoughts or reading material on that?
     
  9. PapaGoose03

    PapaGoose03 Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,057) May 30, 2005 Michigan
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah

    No, I don't have any source material; I'm just guessing on that. I have not brewed a NE IPA nor have I looked at recipes to see if their FG would be typically a bit higher.
     
  10. Supergenious

    Supergenious Maven (1,273) May 9, 2011 Michigan

    It's not possible for your specific gravity to fall and then rise again on its own. You either read your hydrometer wrong or had a bunch of trub in your 2nd sample.
    But don't sweat it, you'll be fine. Your FG probably didn't fall much more than the 1.012 you read on day 3 (maybe a couple points).
    And according to Beersmith your 1.25 oz of sugar puts you at 2.2 vol CO2, so you're good there too.
    RDWHAHB.
     
    Liberatiscioli likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.