First time Imperial IPA

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by mcaulifww, Apr 4, 2012.

Tags:
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. kjyost

    kjyost Initiate (0) May 4, 2008 Canada (MB)

    Yeast pitching rates should not greatly affect attenuation, unless the amount pitched would have gotten stressed and been unable to finish the job at hand. More packs mean less stressed yeast and lower production of esters, fusels, etc...
     
  2. tngolfer

    tngolfer Initiate (0) Feb 16, 2012 Tennessee

    Question to the repliers, generally if your OG is higher than 1.050 one would need a yeast starter for a 5 gal batch, right? Does that change if one is pitching a standard Wyeast package into a 2 gal batch with an OG of 1.070 as the OP is doing?
     
  3. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    It's all about the amount of yeast in relation to the gravity and volume of wort. Calculators are helpful...

    http://www.mrmalty.com/calc/calc.html
     
  4. mcaulifww

    mcaulifww Initiate (0) Aug 18, 2011 Virginia


    Thanks for this. I did a quick check (i left the production date as today's date, since I don't have the wyeast packet anymore) and I got a 1 yeast pack with an intermittent shaking approach. my first pack of yeast died, so my guess is that the production date indicated a lower viability??
     
  5. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    If I'm following right, you added a second pack of yeast. Not sure if you really needed to (from an attenuation perspective), but if there was truly never any activity from the yeast in the first pack, then I'd say that the yeast in that pack were not viable. The reason could be age, but it's hard to say. Usually, older age just means less viable cells, rather than no viable cells. That's why starters should be larger for older yeast.
     
  6. mcaulifww

    mcaulifww Initiate (0) Aug 18, 2011 Virginia


    I saw no activity after 4 days, so I added a second pack.
     
  7. telejunkie

    telejunkie Savant (1,107) Sep 14, 2007 Vermont

    when you say the beer tasted less hoppy, are you talking about the aroma/flavor or the bitterness? If you're talking aroma/flavor, it's probably due to your hop selection. If you're talking bitterness then disregard the rest.

    Cascade & Willamette both have fairly low oil content when compared to todays IIPA choice hops like Columbus, Citra, Centennial, Simcoe, Amarillo, etc...While the clear answer may be to add more to compensate, I don't think adding more is going necessarily get the desired affect you're looking for. As stated earlier, add more Cascade if you're going to be more aggressive with the DH. There is a reason that the above listed hops are the hops of choice among brewers for big hoppy IIPAs.
     
  8. mcaulifww

    mcaulifww Initiate (0) Aug 18, 2011 Virginia


    Thanks for the insight. My taste test was before dry hopping, and flavor/aroma and bitterness were all a little less then expected. I DH more willamette and cascade, wich I assume will mostly contribute to aroma, but it seems that I picked some milder hops instead of the flavor bombs
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.