Glacial Gumballhead?

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by utahbeerdude, May 15, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. utahbeerdude

    utahbeerdude Maven (1,374) May 2, 2006 Utah

    My goal is to brew an American Wheat a la Gumballhead. However, I have no Amarillo hops, but lots of Glacier. Their descriptions in For the Love of Hops are similar, so I am thinking of brewing up the following recipe. Any thoughts from those familiar with Glacier and/or Gumballhead? (I must admit, I've never tried Gumballhead, but it seems to be quite popular.)

    Malt/Grains Fraction
    American 2-Row 0.45
    White Wheat 0.47
    Carapils 0.04
    Carastan (30 - 40 L) 0.04

    Type oz. AA Min.
    Glacier (FWH) 1.0 5.6 90
    Glacier 0.5 5.6 15
    Glacier 0.75 5.6 5
    Glacier (steep) 1.25 5.6 0
    Glacier (dry hop) 1.0

    Target OG = 1.045 (want to keep in lawnmower range)
    IBUs = 25 (Tinseth)
    Single infusion mash at 152 F
    US-05 yeast, fermented 65 - 70 F
     
  2. GreenKrusty101

    GreenKrusty101 Initiate (0) Dec 4, 2008 Nevada

    Should be tasty, but Amarillos define Gumballhead IMHO. I'd double your dryhopping at a minimum.
     
    pweis909 likes this.
  3. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Below is from:http://therulingglass.blogspot.ca/p/a-drinkers-guide-to-hops-archive.html


    “Amarillo has a moderately high amount of alpha acids and a low amount of cohumulone, so it is suitable for bittering, but it seems to be most prized for its aroma/flavor. It’s know for giving off notes of orange, tangerine, apricot and flowers. It is used in any beer style where a burst of citrusy American hops is desired. Most commonly, you’ll see it in beers in the pale ale family.”

    “Given the very low cohumulone levels, Glacier can give off a gentle bitterness that will be perceived as lower than the IBU of the brew might indicate. It is also used for a pleasant, not too forceful flavor/aroma, where it is know for being earthy, herbal and floral with potential notes of sweet and mild citrus, fruit, wood, tea and spice. Most commonly, you are going to see it used in English inspired ales like bitters, pale ales and IPAs, though it can also be used in German influenced brews.”

    I haven’t homebrewed with Glacier hops but based upon the above it doesn’t sound like Amarillo.

    Cheers!
     
  4. utahbeerdude

    utahbeerdude Maven (1,374) May 2, 2006 Utah

    These two descriptions are less similar than those in For the Love of Hops. But a key difference that appears in both sources, that I missed at first, is that Amarillo is a much more intense hop than Glacier. I should probably account for this, either by using more, or expecting less.
     
  5. mattsander

    mattsander Initiate (0) Feb 3, 2010 Canada (AB)

    I love Glacier hops but they really dont resemble Amarillos at all to me. I think this beer will be delicious either way!
     
  6. utahbeerdude

    utahbeerdude Maven (1,374) May 2, 2006 Utah

    How have you used them and how would you characterize them?
     
  7. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    From For the Love of Hops:

    Glacier: “Pleasant, classically mild aroma, floral, including citrus and stone fruits, most notably peach.”

    Amarillo: ‘Intensely fruity (citrus, melon, and stone fruits), well suited for American “hop bombs”.”

    I suppose the only differences are the floral aspect of Glacier and Amarillo being more potent?

    Please report back on how your Glacial Gumballhead turns out.

    Good luck!

    Cheers!
     
  8. jlpred55

    jlpred55 Initiate (0) Jul 26, 2006 Iowa

    I used 4 oz as a FO and another 2 oz as whirlpool in an bigger ESB creation and it was nothing like Amarillo. It was a way more "classically english" than I figured it would be. It was also not at all potently hoppy like I figured it would be. It was pretty tame to be honest. They are more floral and mildly fruity with a bit of peach but I also got some earthy and tea flavors as well. Similar to what others above described. I would use them in a bitter any day, perhaps not in a gumball inspired brew.
     
  9. koopa

    koopa Initiate (0) Apr 20, 2008 New Jersey

    I believe the gumballhead grain bill consists of 2 row, red wheat, and aromatic.
    I add some acid malt for ph and use the following proportions:

    50% 2 row
    42% red wheat
    5% aromatic
    3% acid malt

    35 IBU's
     
  10. pweis909

    pweis909 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,250) Aug 13, 2005 Wisconsin
    Pooh-Bah

    As others said, glacier is not the right hop for this beer, but it should be a nice hop for a different hop forward wheat beer, so I wouldn't hesitate.
     
  11. utahbeerdude

    utahbeerdude Maven (1,374) May 2, 2006 Utah

    I think I'll give my proposed beer (with perhaps small changes) a go. Given the fairly light malt bill, I think I will likely get a good idea of the characteristics of this hop.
     
  12. mikehartigan

    mikehartigan Maven (1,421) Apr 9, 2007 Illinois

    I've never used Glacier, but I have no doubt this will be a tasty beer. But Amarillo is Amarillo. It's one of those hops that really has no substitute, IMO. If you're shooting for Gumball Head, you're likely to be disappointed. But only in the sense that it won't taste like Gumball Head.
     
  13. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

  14. psnydez86

    psnydez86 Initiate (0) Jan 4, 2012 Pennsylvania

    I'm interested how this turns out cuz I'd like to use my home grown glaciers in a similar recipe this year.
     
  15. utahbeerdude

    utahbeerdude Maven (1,374) May 2, 2006 Utah

    Thanks for all the feedback. After reading through some prior discussions on here regarding Glacier, I think I'll push the late additions even later, which should bring out the fruitier aspects and suppress the more earthy characteristics of this hop. Presently I'm considering

    Type oz. AA Min.
    Glacier (FWH) 1 5.6 90
    Glacier 1.5 5.6 5
    Glacier 1.5 5.6 0
    Glacier (dry hop) 1-2 oz, depending upon beer character at time of dry hopping.

    I'll report back after I've brewed it up and given it a try. Again, thanks!
     
  16. mattbk

    mattbk Savant (1,111) Dec 12, 2011 New York

    ive used glacier and love it, again though, nothing like amarillo. glacier is peachy, amarillo orangey. you are right to use it late in the boil. try a different bittering hop for a firmer bitterness, and use much more glacier even than what you propose above. i might go 2-2-3, maybe even 2.5-2.5-3. id also consider mixing up my dry hops with something more citrus, like centennial.
     
    utahbeerdude likes this.
  17. koopa

    koopa Initiate (0) Apr 20, 2008 New Jersey

    I find amarillo to be quite peach like but agree it can come across orange like. But hey, to each (palate) his own!
     
    mattbk likes this.
  18. koopa

    koopa Initiate (0) Apr 20, 2008 New Jersey

    To the OP, Northern brewer suggests the following for Amarillo substitutes...

    "Availability: Out of stock - Due to a poor harvest, Amarillo will be scarce this year. Consider Australian Topaz or Cascade as a substitute."

    Morebeer says:

    "Brewers are describing the flavor and aroma as a supercharged version of Cascade. However, it has a distinctive Orange character to it that is very different from Cascade."
     
  19. inchrisin

    inchrisin Pooh-Bah (2,013) Sep 25, 2008 Indiana
    Pooh-Bah

    Personal preference, I'd up the crystal a bit and use 40L. It just works for me. I'd be worried about your low gravity just falling short of the hop bill. This beer will be thin and watery.

    On a sidenote, this beer should smell like sex in a glass! Let us know how it comes out.
     
  20. utahbeerdude

    utahbeerdude Maven (1,374) May 2, 2006 Utah

    Good point regarding the gravity and the resulting balance vs the hops. I definitely don't want this thin and watery. I do want a light color, however. So perhaps I'll up the carapils (maybe to 8%) and mash pretty high (158 F ?) for not too long (to produce relatively more dextrins and fewer simple sugars). Together these two changes should offset the voraciousness of US-05 somewhat and hopefully produce a decent mouthfeel.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.