How do I lower my SG

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by Ultra-Plinian, Jan 8, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    It's not the number itself that's important (to avoid bottle bombs), it's that the number is stable between readings taken a few days apart.
     
  2. ipas-for-life

    ipas-for-life Savant (1,041) Feb 28, 2012 Virginia

    How do you aerate your wort? I use US-05 for my ipas and almost all DME except for a 1/2 lb of corn sugar. For aeration I use to pour through a double lined metal strainer and paint strainer bag from kettle to bucket. Then I would swirl/shake the bucket for over 5 minutes. At that time I was getting down to 1.012-1.014. Now I use pure O2 and get down to 1.010-1.012. I also primary for 3 weeks and do as much as I can not to stress the yeast out during prep and fermentation.
     
  3. PapaGoose03

    PapaGoose03 Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,057) May 30, 2005 Michigan
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah

    Agree. If the gravity is still heading downward unbeknownst to you then you're going to get too much CO2 in the bottles. A couple readings that are the same, regarding of the actual reading number, confirms that your beer is done. You'll be okay since it sounds like you've taken multiple readings.
     
  4. GreenKrusty101

    GreenKrusty101 Initiate (0) Dec 4, 2008 Nevada

    For a IIPA, replace ~ half of caramel malts with sugar, start fermentation at the lowest end of the band,...enjoy
     
  5. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    What I do know is that Wyeast and White Labs propagate and package yeast via totally different means. I would never associate something that may be specific to one manufacturers operation to another. Consequently I would not conflate values that are published on one manufacturer’s web page with how another manufacturer’s product performs.

    My conversation with Dr. Chris White, which I posted previously, indicated that the die off rate 21 billion yeast cells per month (used in the yeast calculator on Mr. Malt) was a conservative assumption. I have no reason to doubt what Dr. Chris White stated on this particular matter.

    As another example, Wyeast states: “Our Product Warranty states that we guarantee the viability of the yeast in our Activator™ packages for 6 months from the manufacture date assuming that they have been properly shipped, stored and handled.”

    If we consider a brand new Wyeast Smack Pack to have 125 billion yeast cells and that 21 billion yeast cells die off every 30 days (month) then after 6 months there would be absolutely no viable yeast cells (-1 billion yeast cells).

    There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that a die off rate of 21 billion yeast cells per 30 days (month) is a conservative assumption.

    Cheers!
     
  6. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Now we're getting somewhere. You object to Mr. Malty assuming a constant number of cells dying per month, rather than a percentage. But it does not do that. Mr. Malty predicts 76% viability at 30 days. And 55% viability at 60 days. After 6 months, it predicts 10% viability. So it's not a 'number of cells per month.' I honestly can't tell you what the whole curve looks like without doing a shitload of analysis.

    But again I ask you...
    White Labs says "After 30 days in the vial, the viability of our yeast is 75-85%, which is very high for liquid yeast." Do you believe this is reasonable or not? You can answer this question without regard to the actual number of cells the vial starts with.
     
  7. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    “But it does not do that. Mr. Malty predicts 76% viability at 30 days. And 55% viability at 60 days.”

    The Mr. Malty yeast calculator states that the number of cells decrease at a rate of 21 billion cells per month for the first 4 months. So from 1 month old to 2 months old there are 21 billion fewer cells. From 2 months old to 3 months old there are 21 billion fewer cells. From 3 months old to 4 months old there are 21 billion fewer yeast cells. If you want to know the percentage difference for the above:
    • Month 1 to Month 2: a percentage difference of 32%
    • Month 2 to Month 3: a percentage difference of 50%
    • Month 3 to Month 4: a percentage difference of 98%
    A percentage difference of 98% from a 3 month old package to a 4 month old package. Are you kidding me!?!

    As I stated in my prior post: There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that a die off rate of 21 billion yeast cells per 30 days (month) is a conservative assumption.

    Cheers!
     
  8. mattbk

    mattbk Savant (1,111) Dec 12, 2011 New York

    Jack - I don't really have any data to support or deny this regarding yeast cells in hibernation. But I can tell you, as a cell culture biologist (by day), that the rate of drop off in viability of cells is very drastic and often non-linear. As the cells consume components, run out of those components, die, lyse, and release by-products into the culture that the living cells detect, more and more cells will die. It is not uncommon (at least in mammalian cell culture) to have viabilities in the 50-60% one day, and <10% the next, if the conditions are right.
     
  9. kbuzz

    kbuzz Initiate (0) Jan 22, 2011 North Carolina

    Cell Culture Biologist?

    /thread
     
    jlordi12 likes this.
  10. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    I think I see why we're saying two different things. The calculator actually assumes you lose 4% on day 1. You are taking the calculation from that point to the end of four months? Then it is close to what you're saying for the first four months (after day one).

    I happen to agree that when modeling the rates of yeast cell die-off, it may be more appropriate to assume a percentage of the remaining viable cells per time period. Which is what I do in BrewCipher, with the daily percentage being user selectable. I've also been combing the online literature for something definitive on this, but haven't found it yet.
     
  11. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Did I know you were a cell culture biologist? WTF! Any ideas about where to look for data on this question?
     
  12. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Missed this on first read. Where are you getting a 98% difference? In cell counts or in something else?
     
  13. mattbk

    mattbk Savant (1,111) Dec 12, 2011 New York

    I can tell you that refrigerated yeast viability as a function of time is of absolutely no importance to anyone I know or work with in my day job...

    My guess is that WL and WY - who are also cell culture biologists - are absolutely the experts in this field.

    I have considered taking measurements to verify - I do have access to a microscope - but this is just not on my priority list - for the moment anyway.
     
  14. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    The percentage difference of 98% is the between cell counts:
    • Month 3 has 32.18 billion viable yeast cells
    • Month 4 has 10.99 billion viable yeast cells
    The percentage difference between the values of 32.18 and 10.99 is 98.17%.

    Cheers!
     
  15. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    “I have considered taking measurements to verify - I do have access to a microscope”

    Matt, what is the uncertainty (accuracy) for performing a count of viable yeast?

    For example, if you obtain a viable yeast cell count for a 1 month old Wyeast smack pack of x billion viable yeast cells, what ± y% uncertainty is associated with that cell count?

    Cheers!

    Jack
     
  16. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    I guess I'll have to take your word for that.
     
    #36 VikeMan, Jan 8, 2014
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2014
  17. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Calculate percentage difference
    between V1 = 32.18 and V2 = 10.99

    ( | V1 - V2 | / ((V1 + V2)/2) ) * 100

    = ( | 32.18 - 10.99 | / ((32.18 + 10.99)/2) ) * 100
    = ( | 21.19 | / (43.17/2) ) * 100
    = ( 21.19 / 21.585 ) * 100
    = 0.9817 * 100

    = 98.17% difference
     
  18. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Ah. Difference. I was thinking about percentage change, which seems to me to be more appropriate when comparing a new value to an old value. But I get what you meant now.
     
  19. SFACRKnight

    SFACRKnight Grand Pooh-Bah (3,348) Jan 20, 2012 Colorado
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    Brett, as always, is the answer.
     
    kbuzz likes this.
  20. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    The percentage change between 32.18 and 10.99 would be 65.85% if that is a ‘preferred’ metric. Still, a huge difference from a value of 21%.

    Once again I will repeat: There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that a die off rate of 21 billion yeast cells per 30 days (month) is a conservative assumption.

    Cheers!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.