IPA Freshness Hype

Discussion in 'Beer Talk' started by haknort, May 7, 2013.

Tags:
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. haknort

    haknort Initiate (0) Apr 10, 2013 Illinois

    Maybe I haven't been paying close enough attention, but it seems in the past 12 months or so many BAs have been overly concerned with getting their IPAs minutes after they leave the brewery, and dismissing any that are over a few months old.

    I've had fresh Heady Topper, and just had my first fresh Pliny a few days ago. I'm fond of Bell's Two Hearted, Lagunita's Sucks, Hopslam, Hoptimum, Zombie Dust, Alpha King, Dreadnaught, 60, 75, 90, and 120 by Dogfish, and many other current trendy IPAs. I even like the gimmicky ones, like Squall and Mikeller 1000 IBU and Jackhammer.

    But I'm finding the whole trend of "I need the hops super fresh or the beer isn't worth drinking" to be silly. I've enjoyed IPAs that I've cellared for years. I've had Stone's "Enjoy By" months after the date on the bottle, and still found it hoppy and delicious.

    While I'm reasonably certain there is ample scientific proof that hop character does fade with age, I wonder how many BAs have actually tasted blind verticals of their favorite beers to see if they really can detect it.

    I'd bet not many have.

    I have. And I've been fooled by which is freshest.

    Which leads me to believe that some of the hype behind freshness is simply that: hype.

    Now, I'll be the first to admit that I might be wrong. But my questions are:

    Have you blindly tasted verticals and been able to detect the fresher beer?

    If hoppiness fades, where does it run off to when the bottle is sealed?

    Can anyone point to some conclusive scientific proof that IBUs disappear with age?

    Right now I'm drinking a three year old Arctic Panzer Wolf, and loving it. It was cellared at 60 degrees, and still has loads of hop flavor/

    So is everyone here just jumping on the fresh hop bandwagon without actually experimenting on their own? Or is there ample proof that I'm missing?

    Let the debate begin...
     
  2. DrStiffington

    DrStiffington Grand Pooh-Bah (3,740) Oct 27, 2010 New Jersey
    Society Pooh-Bah

    I just had one of my last Hopslams last week, and it sure didn't seem any less hoppy than the first one from January. I think for sure you're right about people on here getting their panties all in a bunch over a few weeks' difference in age.
     
  3. CloudStrife

    CloudStrife Savant (1,219) Nov 20, 2008 New York

    Can you invite me over for some more scientific discovery? Panzer is tasty and would love to try it aged.

    I've heard its more the aroma fades, and smell being part of taste might be the argument for fresher IPA's. To each their own.
     
  4. Shmuffalo

    Shmuffalo Zealot (731) Feb 26, 2012 Pennsylvania

    As a personal opinion, IPAs should be consumed as quickly as possible. My only reasoning is that I don't really enjoy a heavy malt presence. The fresher IPAs are, the more hops and less malt. I'm not snobby about it. If I am looking to by an IPA that is a month or more old, I won't buy it; I'll find something else, because God knows, there is more than enough beer to satisfy us.

    With that said, everyone is different. Some people enjoy how an IPA changes, others don't notice how an IPA changes. Whatever the reason, we're all different, and we all have different palates.

    Sincerely,

    Shmuff Daddy

    P.S. As for the psychological element, I'm not crazy. But maybe a little.
     
  5. haknort

    haknort Initiate (0) Apr 10, 2013 Illinois

    I get what you're saying, but have you ever really tried to compare?

    Take a perennial IPA, save it in the fridge for a year, then blind taste test it against the new batch when it comes out.

    It's not a perfect experiment, because beers can change batch to batch. But I've done verts of Zombie Dust, Hopslam, Panzer, Alpha King, 90, and I'm often fooled as to which was the freshest.

    As IPA lovers, shouldn't we be experimenting with this?
     
    jRocco2021 likes this.
  6. sukwonee

    sukwonee Initiate (0) Dec 13, 2011 Washington

    While I agree for the most part, there are some IPAs for which freshness matters more. I feel that Pliny the Elder is one of those IPAs based on my experience over # of bottles and on draft pints I have consumed.

    Compare this to say, Maharaja, Hopslam, 90 minute, Torpedo, and Sucks, freshness seemed to matter a bit less... obviously, entirely based on my experience and memory (which obviously isn't perfect by any means).
     
    ESeab likes this.
  7. ESeab

    ESeab Initiate (0) Jan 3, 2013 New Jersey

    I've been wondering the same more recently. Before I figured the higher abv/ the longer it can hold up. Once I joined BA (in Jan) I realized the freshness hype.

    I think there is plenty of evidence in my own experience to realize that the fresher, the better. I'm drinking a single centennial hop dipa right now that is past its prime and you can absolutely detect plenty of hops, but they are not as 'alive' as they once were and taste a bit stale. I personally don't put a ton of emphasis on freshness (I saved my last sucks for a whole other month before drinking it) but I understand that hops really do 'fall off'

    I don't know if that answers any questions. I've done a side by side with a Dales and noticed the fresher one more citrusy/crisp, but I wouldn't turn an ipa down just because it's three months old.

    I know some people that prefer aging such beers i.e. my buddy thinks Nugget Nectar is perfect with 9 months on it. (I totally disagree. Funny thing I think two week old NN is better than two day old though)

    Edit: On the beers I've compared freshness. Big difference- Sculpin (I didn't think it was even good the first three bottles), Enjoy by. Not much - 90 minute, Dorado.
    And Flower Power is always good, just fades by tiny increments over time.
     
    ufmj likes this.
  8. Shmuffalo

    Shmuffalo Zealot (731) Feb 26, 2012 Pennsylvania

    I've never realized that, but age on an IPA is really shown the aroma. I've had Head Hunter that is days old, and the smell that is bequeaths is joyous. I've also had 2 month hold Head Hunter; and while it is delicious, the aroma just isn't the same.
     
    JackHorzempa likes this.
  9. Frankinstiener

    Frankinstiener Initiate (0) Jul 28, 2009 Illinois

    I have tested the same IPA around 6 months difference in age several times, along with having many other hoppy beers with too much age on them. Not only do I think the hops fall off with age but in my opinion they develop a distinct "old hop" flavor. Some have called it wet cardboard, cheese etc, to me none of those do it justice. It tastes like old hops. Yes, I have picked out the older beer in a blind testing with two of the same beers. This flavor isn't necessary that bad, the problem is that it takes away from original character the hops (citrusy, piney, earthy, whichever) and begins to deteriorate into the bland old hop flavor. All that said, a couple weeks isn't going to make a huge difference one way or another, but a couple months is, especially after that 3 month mark. I also think that different species of hops can deteriorate faster and slower than others. I don't have enough experience to say which ones hold up longer. But, if they behave differently during every other step of the process (while growing, during the boil, during dry hop) than I would bet they behave differently with some age.
     
  10. Pahn

    Pahn Initiate (0) Dec 2, 2009 New York

    it is stupid to be upset that other people care more about freshness than you do. get over it.
     
  11. Shmuffalo

    Shmuffalo Zealot (731) Feb 26, 2012 Pennsylvania

    I haven't done a vertical. Though, I've had fresh Zombie Dust and old Zombie Dust passed off as fresh, and it was easily apparent that it wasn't fresh. Again, an IPA isn't bad if its older, it just loses some of those characteristics that really make it pop.
     
    LarryK and xxbillay like this.
  12. haknort

    haknort Initiate (0) Apr 10, 2013 Illinois

    One of my fave beers is Behemoth, a barelywine that is really well hopped. It ages very well, but even the stuff from years ago retains and nice hoppy bite. I admit I can detect the fade form hops to malt, but this is a barelywine. With IPAs and DIPAs, my palate isn't as accurate. Or maybe, if something is dry-hopped to the bejezus belt, the hops flavor doesn't fade as much...
     
  13. haknort

    haknort Initiate (0) Apr 10, 2013 Illinois

    It's stupider to post in a thread without contributing anything. Just sayin'.
     
  14. penniwisdom

    penniwisdom Crusader (498) Sep 10, 2010 California

    Hops oxidize quickly in beer. They actually gradually give it an off flavor. Makes it taste stale.
     
    Joenajera, jmalex, fox227 and 6 others like this.
  15. rails

    rails Initiate (0) Nov 8, 2012 California


    You've enjoyed IPAs cellared for years? really?

    Most Ipas are dry hopped a lot that gives us that wonderful smell fruity, tropical dankness. That's the first thing to go if it's not refrigerated it's gone in a couple months.

    You want to waste that beautiful smell and all the dry hops it took to get it you go right ahead and cellar that ipa for a couple years. Beers like Citra & Sculpin are dry hopped to the point they smell like fruit juice you age that a couple months at room temperature and its gone it's just a shell of the beer that you once had.
     
  16. HokiesandBeer

    HokiesandBeer Initiate (0) Jan 10, 2013 Pennsylvania

    I kind of agree with the OP.......never really thought about the whole freshness thing on IPA's as long as they were within the DoB.....until I bought a case of Enjoy By. I drank my first Enjoy By within a week or its born on date....finished the last Enjoy By the day after the best by date....I did notice a difference.

    Now I understand Enjoy By might be a bad example as I'm assuming it may be a beer which is brewed specifically for a short shelf life but I did notice a difference....though I really don't think it's nearly as extreme as most people on BA claim. Yes I preferred the Enjoy By when it was more "fresh" but even when it had "expired" by 24 hours it was still a damn tasty beer.
     
  17. Pahn

    Pahn Initiate (0) Dec 2, 2009 New York

    p.s. your original post is confused anyway. IBUs "fade" much slower than the flavor imparted by hop oils. just look up some homebrewing literature (or the million posts on BA) about it. p.p.s. beer is not the only thing that gets less flavorful even though it comes in a sealed package. even talking about the "science" behind it is being a bit over the top... we're not in science=magic territory here.
     
    theminutemen, jmalex, fox227 and 2 others like this.
  18. kingofhop

    kingofhop Initiate (0) May 9, 2010 Oklahoma
    In Memoriam

    Fresh IPAs are cool and all, but I'll take m'lady cleansing herself w/ a Summer's Eve over a gotdam beer, anytime. Y'all got yer priorities mixed up.
     
  19. haknort

    haknort Initiate (0) Apr 10, 2013 Illinois

    That's contributing. Thanks for the info.

    I'm a scotch and bourbon fan, and I believe whiskey changes in the bottle, while many believe once it leaves the barrel is stays the same. I assume the same is true for beer. But I haven't been able to taste that change with consistency, and was wondering if I'm the only one.
     
  20. ESeab

    ESeab Initiate (0) Jan 3, 2013 New Jersey

    Agreed with the fact that I like bw with some age as well. I think the dry hopping part fads very very fast in the nose/aroma, which in affect, make the taste fade faster too. Two examples that come to mind, SN Estate and Port High Tide, both dry hopped. I had both in December, then both in Feb and it was a HUGE fall off. I think dry hopping is actually ment to be consumed fresher, I could be wrong though. (and indeed I am, they were wet hopped, now I really have to research)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.