Is there a noticeable difference between Schlitz regular and Schlitz 1960's Gusto?

Discussion in 'Beer Talk' started by Derranged, Sep 26, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Derranged

    Derranged Initiate (0) Mar 7, 2010 New York

    Schlitz Gusto is one of my favorite AALs but its hard to find. I never had the "regular" version.

    Yesterday in the Hackensack Total Wine (NJ) I saw Schlitz but it must have been the "regular" version of it because it did not say "Classic 1960s Formula" on the label, so I opted not to buy it. I note that it was only $4.99 a six pack, just like the Gusto was two years ago.

    But since I like having cheap sessionable beer, as well as strong beer, I feel like I should have bought it anyway. So I ask, for those who've had both, is there a noticeable difference between the two beers? Thanks.
     
  2. AlcahueteJ

    AlcahueteJ Grand Pooh-Bah (3,242) Dec 4, 2004 Massachusetts
    Society Pooh-Bah

    Supposedly the "1960s formula" Schlitz simply has more malt and less adjunct. Personally, when they switched it went from being just like Pabst, to my favorite adjunct lager. I still hardly purchase it because I'm not a huge fan of the style, but it's by far the most tolerable for my palate.
     
  3. Dools9

    Dools9 Pooh-Bah (1,788) Jul 5, 2011 Massachusetts
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    I think they dropped the 60's formula name recently.
     
  4. jesskidden

    jesskidden Grand Pooh-Bah (3,145) Aug 10, 2005 New Jersey
    Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    And, IIRC, a different hopping rate and mix, and different hop "form". Miller originally brewed the Schlitz Gusto in it's NC brewery *which was known to have more flexibility than other Miller breweries- that where the kraeusened and hop pellet-brewed BBC Samuel Adams beers were brewed, after all. They only "returned" it to Milwaukee after Miller's brewery there underwent renovations done to allow the brewing of Coors brands there. The implied suggestion was that Milwaukee previously was no long equipped to handle hop pellets (or maybe whole hops?), but was using only extract.
    I thought Pabst was going to phase out the "economy/regular" Schlitz eventually - and I thought that would have happened once Milwaukee (and possibly other ex-Miller facilities) were upgraded to brew "Gusto". The fact that the OP says it's the same price might mean there are now simply dropping the "Gusto" terminology which existed only to distinguish the two Schlitz's?


     
  5. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    A few years ago, when I was able to purchase Schlitz 1960s Formula Lager at my local retail beer distributor, they had a ‘sell sheet’ on top of the cases of beer which compared the Schlitz 1960s Formula beer to Budweiser and Miller High Life. The basic difference was that Schlitz 1960s formula had less adjuncts (i.e., more malt) and more hops than Bud/Miller.

    Below is something I posted previously:

    “Now, Schlitz 1960’s formula beer is not ‘earth shattering’ but it is indeed more flavorful than a typical BMC beer. They utilize a bit more hops (bittering and flavor/aroma) then present day BMC beers so it has more hop presence. They still use adjuncts in this beer (corn) but at a lower level; they use 30% adjunct in making this beer.

    What they were going for in making this beer is just as the label say: 1960’s formula. This means a bit more hops and less adjuncts then present day beers. I thought this was a very tasty and pleasant beer given that it is an American Adjunct Lager.”

    Cheers!
     
  6. ZAP

    ZAP Grand Pooh-Bah (4,048) Dec 1, 2001 Minnesota
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    Any idea what Coors did differently at their brewery that Miller was not fit to do at theirs?
     
  7. dhannes

    dhannes Savant (1,127) Feb 14, 2010 Wisconsin


    "Formula" sounds chemical...should use the word "recipe."
     
  8. muck1979

    muck1979 Zealot (555) Jul 3, 2005 Minnesota

    I've also seen the "regular" Schlitz packaging to which the OP refers recently in the Twin Cities and my initial thought was that Pabst was phasing out the 1960s version and going back to the economy Schlitz (the packaging included both the long neck bottles and tall boy cans in which I had only seen the 60s Schlitz before).

    Since the "Gusto" Schlitz campaign started during the previous Pabst ownership, perhaps the Metropouloses decided that the margins weren't there with the 60s Schlitz. I haven't bought any of the "regular" Schlitz ito try it and see if there's a difference...probably because I really enjoy the 60s Schlitz and was afraid I was right.
     
  9. DougC123

    DougC123 Savant (1,186) Aug 21, 2012 Connecticut

    I can see why you wouldn't want to risk the $4.99.
     
    Acforster2 likes this.
  10. spicoli00

    spicoli00 Pooh-Bah (2,305) Jul 6, 2005 Indiana
    Pooh-Bah

    One tastes like horse piss, the other one tastes like donkey piss
     
    DrunkethWizard and liane like this.
  11. Derranged

    Derranged Initiate (0) Mar 7, 2010 New York

    Hahaha.. It wasn't about the money, chief.
     
  12. Derranged

    Derranged Initiate (0) Mar 7, 2010 New York

    So in other words, its possible there's no more Gusto? I guess I'll live.
     
  13. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    “So in other words, its possible there's no more Gusto?”

    It is my interpretation that Schlitz 1960s Formula Lager is available in some areas of the country but not available in other areas. As to why there is a difference in availability, I have no clue.

    Cheers!
     
  14. jesskidden

    jesskidden Grand Pooh-Bah (3,145) Aug 10, 2005 New Jersey
    Society Pooh-Bah Trader

    Well, the Pabst spokesman mentioned only "special equipment" for the hops- so one could speculate that Miller had switched all their beers to using a liquid hop extract (they do for the clear-bottled ones, using the "light stable" products to prevent skunking). Or, possible, they weren't set up for whole hops - not sure if "60s formula" Schlitz would have used pellets (their usage really take off until the 1970s) or if Coors still brews anything with whole hops.

    The only other "official" thing I've read, is setting aside silos for Coors' malt, and yeast storage to keep the Coors yeast and Miller yeast separated.

    Additionally, Miller supposedly had mothballed their cereal cookers in most of their breweries by the 90s as they switched to corn syrup for their adjunct - so it could be that they had to re-open them for Coors products? Coors "Banquet" once used rice and the company boasted of their special contracted rice farms --- but that was the previous generation of the family ownership, and before the mergers with Molson and then Miller. And these days their promo material only uses vague terms like "cereal grains" when discussing adjuncts.
     
    ZAP likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.