Just ordered NB's Pliny clone: please comment

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by ronobvious2, Aug 13, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ronobvious2

    ronobvious2 Initiate (0) Aug 24, 2010 Tennessee

    Their instructions, for starters.

    Of course the goal here is to make a beer with few/no flaws, but here are some of my goals/thoughts/processes/equipment. Feel free to comment on any you like or in general, especially if you've done this one before.

    1. Extract kit.
    2. 6.5 gallon BB for fermentor, 5 gallon BB secondary vessel. I will be 2ndarying this one.
    3. 6 gallon brew kettle.
    4. I'll use this Utah Biodiesel Hop Spider to reduce hop trub in the fermentor.
    5. And this during dry hopping. I'll have to use a paint bag for the second dry hopping.
    6. Wort chiller.
    7. I will make a yeast starter! I ordered a pack of Safale US-05 with this kit and since I have a StirStarter, might as well use it.
    8. I may bottle this one. I have empty bombers and EZ cap bottles from dwindling beer stock.
    9. I have both Whirlfloc and Irish Moss. Any opinions on which is better?
    Since I want to secondary this time, I'd appreciate any tips on keeping the beer as pure as possible. I tried not doing the secondary on the last two batches - I'd like to have this one be clearer than my ESB and Lakefront clone. Until I get the kit and am ready to brew, I'll read up on secondary practices.
     
  2. JrGtr

    JrGtr Pooh-Bah (1,775) Apr 13, 2006 Massachusetts
    Pooh-Bah

    The things to keep in mind to have a good brew is temperature, temperature, temperature, yeast and temperature.
    You need to keep a handle on your fermentation temps, keep it mid60's or a hail lower for best results. Some might say to do a cold-crash before racking to secondary (bring down into the 30's for a couple days to force things to settle out.) I don't normally recommend secondary except for souring or wood against, but this might be an exception. If you do, make sure you're fully fermented- don't transfer after a week, give it at least 2. Make sure you disturb the beer as little as possible to prevent oxidation. If possible flush the second with co2 before racking. Also, make sure you have plenty of yeast. Some say to not do a starter with dry yeast, but I don't see a downside. Maybe instead of starter pitch 2 packs of yeast if you can get another.
     
    kneary13 and ronobvious2 like this.
  3. dblab33

    dblab33 Initiate (0) Dec 9, 2011 Michigan

    One pack of properly rehydrated US-05 will be fine for this beer. No starter required.
     
    ronobvious2 likes this.
  4. ronobvious2

    ronobvious2 Initiate (0) Aug 24, 2010 Tennessee

    Even still, for the purposes of learning to do it? BTW, this, written by the man himself, says to pitch two packages of dry yeast or use a starter. He also mentions purging secondarys and kegs with CO2, something I'll be doing.
     
  5. MLucky

    MLucky Initiate (0) Jul 31, 2010 California

    True. Although you'd probably be underpitching a bit.

    IIRC your dry yeast pack has about 220B cells. That sounds a bit light for a 1.072-ish beer, which probably needs, what, 250B? But underpitching by 10-15% would be unlikely to cause any problems.
     
  6. dblab33

    dblab33 Initiate (0) Dec 9, 2011 Michigan

    He doesn't say to pitch two packages of dry yeast. He says two packages or make a starter and specifies WLP001 or WY1056 in the recipe. You'd likely need two packs of either of those in order to have plenty of yeast if you did not want to make a starter. One pack of dry is either right on or very slightly under pitching depending on which yeast calculator you use.
     
  7. ThomP

    ThomP Initiate (0) Nov 22, 2007 Texas

    generally you do not make a starter with dry yeast, just rehydrate.
     
  8. Chelsea1905

    Chelsea1905 Initiate (0) Sep 3, 2008 Washington

    how'd you do that with dry yeast?
     
  9. PapaGoose03

    PapaGoose03 Grand High Pooh-Bah (6,057) May 30, 2005 Michigan
    BA4LYFE Society Pooh-Bah

    The recipe calls for only a 2.5 gallon boil. Since your pot will hold more than that amount I suggest that you go with as much water in the pot that you are comfortable boiling. You'll get more oils out of your hops with the greater volume of water.

    Also, I wonder if the two weeks of conditioning in a secondary that is called for in the instructions is necessary after the 2-week fermentation. It certainly can't hurt, but when I brewed the Pliny clone I did not have a conditioning period and I brewed a great-tasting beer that I think was better than Pliny. I suppose it just depends on how patient you are.
     
    ronobvious2 and PortLargo like this.
  10. nicow5

    nicow5 Initiate (0) May 31, 2014 Minnesota

    Just moved this beer into secondary today. Looking forward to drinking!!
     
    ronobvious2 likes this.
  11. HerbMeowing

    HerbMeowing Maven (1,295) Nov 10, 2010 Virginia
    Trader

    Don't do it. Starters are only appropriate for liquid yeasts.
    OPINION: Irish Moss has produced a higher density trub than Whirlfloc in my brew-closet. Higher density trub means less loss of clear wort volume available for the fermentor.
    A 2ndary won't affect this beer's 'purity' to any great extent b/c the recipe has an exceptionally large loading of dry-hops.

    Clarity can be improved by 1) cold-crashing before bottling and / or 2) adding finings...such as gelatin...at bottling...and / or 3) extended cold conditioning before serving.
     
    ronobvious2 likes this.
  12. ThomP

    ThomP Initiate (0) Nov 22, 2007 Texas

    What re-hydrate? add a cup of water, preferably boiled and cooled, if you have a stir plate use it. Make the Yeast cream and add fermentors to fermenter :} see Herbmeowing above
     
  13. AlCaponeJunior

    AlCaponeJunior Grand Pooh-Bah (3,452) May 21, 2010 Texas
    Society Pooh-Bah

    my pte clone-esque* thing came out stupendous (made my top six list) without use of secondary or finings beyond irish moss. just because something works with a more complicated method doesn't mean it won't work just as well with a simpler one. really the reason I went with three weeks brew to bottle was to get it done asap before any theoretical loss of hop flavor, and to include a 14 day dry hopping regime.

    *same grist, different hops, stupendous beer resulting
     
  14. ronobvious2

    ronobvious2 Initiate (0) Aug 24, 2010 Tennessee

    Yeah, I usually go for a as much water as I can, something like 4.5 gallon and I just stand over it until the hot break is over.

    So, you went for a 2 week or so ferment then straight to drinking?
     
  15. ronobvious2

    ronobvious2 Initiate (0) Aug 24, 2010 Tennessee

    I wasn't clear on the 2ndary part. I want clearer beer and so am looking for any additional techniques that will help the transfer from primary to secondary keep the beer from becoming flawed in any way. I already know about not splashing the brew around. This time, since I have kegging equipment and CO2, I will flood the secondary vessel with CO2. So, a little more research, especially with adding finings at bottling. I've only done some kind of clarity agent during the boil.
     
  16. ronobvious2

    ronobvious2 Initiate (0) Aug 24, 2010 Tennessee

    So how long for primary, then secondary?
     
  17. Srkolodn

    Srkolodn Savant (1,050) Dec 26, 2013 New York
    Trader

    I did this kit in June, pitched 2 packs of US05 and transferred to bottles after 6 weeks. The bottles needed 2 weeks to acheive the right carb. (as this was a higher abv. brew).
     
  18. MLucky

    MLucky Initiate (0) Jul 31, 2010 California

    Why do you say that?

    True, the more common procedure with dry yeast would be to adjust the amount. Assuming this Pliny clone is about 1.072 OG, the OP needs about 270 billion cells, or so says Mr Malty, anyway. An 11.5g pack of dry yeast has about 230B. Most people who use dry yeast would, rather than make a starter, add about 2 more grams of dry yeast to achieve the proper pitch rate, but it would also be possible to raise the cell count via making a starter. That would be more work, but I don't see anything inappropriate about it. What am I missing here?
     
  19. Wolfhead

    Wolfhead Pundit (795) Sep 1, 2009 Illinois

    I just brewed the MoreBeer PTE clone and did a 7 gal 90 minute boil, used a hop spider and used whirlfloc (had a shitload of trub and I'll try Irish Moss next time) and pitched a 1800 ml Wyeast starter. Best taing beer out of the kettle I've done yet. Complete fermentation in 2 weeks and I just racked to secondary for dry hopping. Ended up with about 4.5 gallons in the secondary and still smells insane.
    I think cold crashing helps especialy after dry hopping and there's 5oz going in this one and I agree with Mothergoose, boil as big as you can. Good luck & RDWHAHB
     
  20. ronobvious2

    ronobvious2 Initiate (0) Aug 24, 2010 Tennessee

    Just curous, whose hop spider did you use? Think it is more than a little effective?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.