Looking to upgrade system...thoughts?

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by cracker, May 26, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. cracker

    cracker Pundit (893) May 2, 2004 Pennsylvania

    Haven't posted or been here in a while. Been busy with work, life, and two young boys.

    Anyways, I still find the time to brew...probably once every 6-8 weeks max. Currently I brew 5 gallon batches all-grain by batch sparging in a rectangular cooler, boil in an 8 gallon kettle, and use an immersion chiller (25 ft) with a submersible water pump to recirculate ice water for wort cooling. I keg all my beers.

    I've been happy with this set up for the last 5+ years. But I've been looking into a few possible upgrades and was wondering what the group would do. I may do all of this or just a few items.

    1) Get a Chugger or March pump so I no longer need to lift heavy kettles etc.
    2) Get a longer immersion chiller 50ft with a recirculation arm for whirlpooling OR get a plate chiller. My current set up takes me about 25-30 mins to cool down to ~66F. Not terrible but I would like to do better to increase hop aroma/flavor. I'm a little wary of the plate chillers in terms of getting them properly cleaned etc. Seems like the clean up is a PIA as opposed to an immersion chiller. I don't want an even longer brew day!
    3) Get Camlock disconnects for above plumbing.
    4) Upgrade to 10 gallon batches so I don't have to brew as often if time does not allow me. Would have to buy a new boil kettle. Only downside is my temp control set up (a chest freezer) only fits one fermenter.
     
  2. inchrisin

    inchrisin Pooh-Bah (2,013) Sep 25, 2008 Indiana
    Pooh-Bah

    Long time no see. Good to see that you're still brewing.

    I did Big Brew Day last year, and I actually had the attendant guy use a counterflow chiller on my wort. There was a lot of StarSan that got worked into the fermenter and it took at least 30 minutes to get my wort down to a whopping 74F. I still needed to take the wort home, fridge it, aerate, and pitch. Maybe others have more luck with this up north where the ground water is cooler. It might be good for indoor winter brewing.

    10 Gal batches sound great until you realize that you're going to sink money into a bigger chiller, a bigger kettle, and brew day is going to take longer. It's hard for me to get amped up for a 6 hour brew day, and I don't even have kids. Just something to consider. I have done a few 10 gal batches lately, and like you, I only have room for 5 gal in the regulated fridge. I typically split the 10 gal batch with 2 yeast strains. I have a basement that sits at a temp of 60-64F depending on the season. The fridge gets the yeast that needs the attention. I can cool it if I need to go lower, and I have shop light with a CFL bulb in there if I want to ramp it up above 64. Cracking the door keeps the light from getting above 68-70F for a D rest too. It's not an exact science for me.

    I had a recent post on trying to speed up 10 gal batches. I'm leaning towards making a heat stick, or a second propane burner for heating strike and sparge water, as that's where my process really bottlenecks. http://www.beeradvocate.com/community/threads/streamlining-time-on-a-large-batch.291925/
     
  3. cracker

    cracker Pundit (893) May 2, 2004 Pennsylvania

    I hear you. I definitely don't want a longer brew day. I'm at about ~5 hours right now as it is. Obviously 10 gallons would increase it by at least 45-60 mins in terms of getting all the water ready for mash, sparge, and boil and then cooling wort.
     
  4. Brew_Betty

    Brew_Betty Initiate (0) Jan 5, 2015 Wisconsin

    A plate chiller isn't too difficult or time consuming to clean. However, some people make it more difficult than it needs to be.

    Rinse it with rapidly flowing hot water. Soak it in boiling hot PBW not oxiclean. Rinse it the next day. Done.
     
  5. inchrisin

    inchrisin Pooh-Bah (2,013) Sep 25, 2008 Indiana
    Pooh-Bah

    Do you sanitize it on brew day, or is there a way to back flush with boiling wort?
     
  6. pweis909

    pweis909 Grand Pooh-Bah (3,250) Aug 13, 2005 Wisconsin
    Pooh-Bah

    I like the pump idea. I don't personally have one. Lifting full kettles is starting to get more difficult with a recent shoulder injury. Homebrewing is starting to feel like a young man's game.
     
    jamescain and cracker like this.
  7. FeDUBBELFIST

    FeDUBBELFIST Pooh-Bah (1,765) Oct 31, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Can your mash tun handle 10 gallon batches? If so, I would consider upgrading the boil kettle to a 15 gallon kettle.

    If you still have mobey to spend, I'd go the chugger pump and plate chiller route. In that case, you'd want a kettle with a valve at the bottom and a recirculaltion port at the top (might have to DIY the last part). You would also need new hoses and quick disconnects in this scenario. Very much a domino effect.
     
    #7 FeDUBBELFIST, May 27, 2015
    Last edited: May 27, 2015
  8. Brew_Betty

    Brew_Betty Initiate (0) Jan 5, 2015 Wisconsin

    On brew day, I drain a gallon of starsan from the kettle through the chiller into the fermenter.
     
    inchrisin likes this.
  9. SFACRKnight

    SFACRKnight Grand Pooh-Bah (3,348) Jan 20, 2012 Colorado
    Pooh-Bah Trader

    I would get the pump first. Lifting kettles full of strike or sparge water to chest height is not only a pain, but dangerous too. Ten gallon batches dont really add much more time to my brew days. Maybe an hour at most. Glad I went that big though, split batches are nice.
     
    cracker likes this.
  10. Seacoastbrewer

    Seacoastbrewer Initiate (0) Jun 5, 2012 New Hampshire

    1. Yeah, I can appreciate that. Lifting stuff gets old.
    2. Are you trying to cool your wort faster, or increase hop aroma/flavor? You state both items. At my scale, a longer and thicker gauge immersion cooler works for me. You get more contact with the wort with an immersion chiller. If you want to read more about it, I like this guys website and explanation: http://brulosophy.com/2014/12/19/wort-chiller-challenge-elbow-grease-vs-automation-xbmt-results/
    3. Okay
    4. I have since stopped brewing 5 gallon batches and brew 10 and 15 gallon with a 20 gallon brew kettle. Much like was mentioned above, I get several batches for what I consider a similar amount of time. You're still mashing, boiling, and fermenting the same amount of time. I guess I have a tiny bit more cleaning but only because I use two 10 gallon round coolers as mash tuns. I consider that worth it. For most batches I'll keep around 5 gallons to sour, or just have extra wort for starters and or krausening.

    Good luck with your upgrades!
     
  11. hyndmanevan

    hyndmanevan Initiate (0) Mar 2, 2007 Indiana

    I've slowly converted from 5 to 10 gallons. I purchased a new hose/burner and was able to reuse my regular stand. I also went from a 7.5 gallon kettle to 15, and the burner can heat it quickly. Sunday, when I brewed, I skipped the mash tun for the first time and experimented with direct method in the pot with 22 lbs of grain and 11 gallons of water. It felt too easy, I liked it better than using the mash tun because for me, the tun involves setting up a temporary table in the garage and scooping the strike/sparge water into the chest high cooler. The burner sits a lot lower and doesn't require a table. If the result are good, I'll continue to do that. I then use gravity through my plate chiller. It's kind of a long day, but it seemed pretty hands off; I have a 1 and 3 year old and was able to pay more attention to them than the beer. Even my wife commented about how it didn't seem like I did anything. I brew about every 8-10 weeks.
     
  12. cracker

    cracker Pundit (893) May 2, 2004 Pennsylvania


    By skipping the mashtun do you mean you did a brew in a bag (BIAB)? How much time did you save? What was your efficiency. Just curious.
     
    #12 cracker, May 27, 2015
    Last edited: May 27, 2015
  13. cracker

    cracker Pundit (893) May 2, 2004 Pennsylvania

    Yes my tun can handle 10 gallon batches. In fact I have done several with a buddy who has a 15 gallon blichman kettle, pump, and plate chiller.

    Why would I need a recirculation port at the top? Seems like a kettle with one valve is good enough. That's all my buddy's set up had when we did 10 gallon batches on his blichman.
     
  14. mugs1789

    mugs1789 Zealot (611) Dec 6, 2005 Maryland

    My setup is very similar except I recently upgraded from a 8 gallon lobster pot to a 15 gallon kettle with ball valve. I still need gravity to drain from the kettle to the bucket, but I don't lift a kettle full of hot wort anymore. A kettle with ball valve and/or march pump might be a nice upgrade.
     
  15. Naugled

    Naugled Pooh-Bah (1,944) Sep 25, 2007 New York
    Pooh-Bah

    I've progressed through everything on your list over the years.
    1) After I got my first pump and started to use it, I thought, what the hell took me so long. I'm ready to buy a second one, just because.
    2) I switched to a CFC from an immersion, works great, if this ever needs to be replaced for some reason I'd probably get a plate chiller. I like how compact they are. The only thing I kick my self over is that I got rid of my immersion, I should have kept it, the price of copper is ridiculous these days.
    3) I really like my Camlocks, I put them on everything I can.
    4) Switched to 10 gals and realized that's too much of the same beer, switched back to brewing 5, and sometimes 3, I like having variety. I got some of those 3 gal cornies and I bottle some styles that I like to age.
     
  16. hyndmanevan

    hyndmanevan Initiate (0) Mar 2, 2007 Indiana

    I had a bazooka screen to attach to my ball valve from when I went from immersion chiller to plate chiller to filter the hops. That didn't work, at all, but it did a fine job on the mash. I had 70%, which is about what I do in my tun. Although since I mashed so thin (worried about scorching) I only needed 4 gallons to sparge, whereas when I use my tun, I mash thick and split my sparge into two runs and get 70%, so I'm thinking it might be slightly more efficient. I don't know, too many variables. My time saving was in setup and tear down time, with the added benefit of a little less heavy lifting. I didn't try to set a speed record, for example I had the burner pretty low to heat to 150, and in the meantime I cooked pancakes for the family, ate, and cleaned up. By then it was close and once it hit 150, I killed the heat and played with the kids while rested. Usually I have the burning screaming and it requires constant watching then transferring. Things like that made it seem easier for me.
     
  17. cracker

    cracker Pundit (893) May 2, 2004 Pennsylvania

    Do you use pellet hops? How do you filter your hops now since you use plate chiller? Bag them? I use whole hops (personal preference), throw them right into the kettle, and bazooka works fine for me. Hopefully if I go to using a pump/plate chiller that will still work for me. I know pellets clog a bazooka.
     
  18. jnrjr79

    jnrjr79 Initiate (0) Feb 23, 2009 Illinois


    My process is similar. I siphon ~3 gallons of sanitizer through it once brew day is done and then rinse. Then, on my next brew day while the wort is boiling, I run anywhere from 3-6 gallons of sanitizer through the chiller and into the carboy.

    The plate chiller is moderately more of a pain than an immersion chiller, but when coupled with a sump pump pushing ice water through it, it's really darn efficient.
     
  19. WickedSluggy

    WickedSluggy Savant (1,129) Nov 21, 2008 Texas

    Other things besides some you mentioned:
    • Programmable Control systems are fun to work on even when you're not brewing. BCS-460 and solid state relays.
    • DYI RIMS tube - easy, cheap and great process to increase consistency and efficiency.
    • Hop Back (such as Blichmann Hop Rocket) - doubles as boil hops and hot break filter.
    • Plate chiller (post hop back) - nothing's better for condensing aromatics from heated hop back.
     
  20. hyndmanevan

    hyndmanevan Initiate (0) Mar 2, 2007 Indiana

    Pellets in a paint bag.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.