mash temp vs fermenbility

Discussion in 'Homebrewing' started by Crackerbarrel, Feb 14, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Crackerbarrel

    Crackerbarrel Initiate (0) Feb 10, 2014 New York

    I haven't yet brewed an all grain batch (hoping to this wknd), but have been reading plenty about it, and the logic in mash temps vs fermentability goes right over my head.

    I've read something like the following dozens of times:

    "Most brewers are aware that the magic in the mash that converts starches in the malt to sugar is due primarily to two enzymes: Alpha and Beta Amylase. Beta amylase is an enzyme that brakes straight starches (without branches) into maltose, and is the predominate factor in the fermentability of a wort. The ideal temperature for beta amylase activity is lower than that of alpha amylase. So in general, the cooler you mash at the more fermentable your wort will be, and the dryer (less sweet) the resulting beer will be.
    Alpha amylase breaks down starches with branches, and allows the beta-amylase to further convert them to maltose. Alpha amylase is most active at higher temperatures. It also causes the resulting sugars produced to be less fermentable (more dextrins) and thus adds to the body of wort."


    ...I don't quite grasp how wort becomes less fermentable at higher temps. Particularly in light of the second paragraph..."alpha allows beta to further convert to maltose"...it would seem that the wort would become more fermentable.

    I'm sure to be overlooking one small but very obvious piece to the puzzle. Thanks for your patience.
     
  2. Wanda

    Wanda Zealot (518) Nov 23, 2006 Tennessee

    Higher temps create sugars that the yeast can not consume and are therefore unfermentable. These unfermentable sugars usually contribute to mouth feel and viscosity. Lower mash temps produce higher fermentable sugars but at the cost of the beer being "thin" I.e. no mouth feel. Check How to brew by John Palmer. He writes a pretty good explanation in it.
     
    Genuine and Crackerbarrel like this.
  3. Crackerbarrel

    Crackerbarrel Initiate (0) Feb 10, 2014 New York

    Thanks. I'm always stuck connecting it with cooking...i.e., ramp up the heat and it breaks down more. But your first sentence clarifies a point that I always seem to miss.

    I'm always picking through How to Brew, I know there's a "cutting branches" allegory that explains this. I know 'what' to do in many cases, just not always why.
     
    Wanda likes this.
  4. Wanda

    Wanda Zealot (518) Nov 23, 2006 Tennessee

    I think of myself of as more of a Jessie Pinkman rather than a Walter White at this point in my brewing. I can follow recipies (can't spell the word but I can follow 'em) and I can follow directions...however when it comes to the exact nature of the molecular chains and the nitty gritty of it, well, just lead me to the barrel with the bee on it.
     
  5. FeDUBBELFIST

    FeDUBBELFIST Pooh-Bah (1,765) Oct 31, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Bobby from NJ explains it very well in this video:

     
  6. dmtaylor

    dmtaylor Savant (1,149) Dec 30, 2003 Wisconsin

    Starches are basically made of really really long sugar molecules. The result of their length is that starches are full bodied and not very sweet. The simplest sugars on the other hand are much smaller molecules. These have no body and are very sweet.

    So, when you are mashing, you want to break those long molecules down as much as possible. There are two primary enzymes involved, alpha and beta amylase.

    Alpha amylase is kind of like your grain mill, or a rock crusher. It coursely crushes the starches into smaller pieces without turning too much of it into dust. Turn up the heat and it just works faster. Turn down the heat and it works slowly.

    Beta amylase acts differently. It can't break up the starches like a mill or crusher, but can only nibble on it a little at a time. Picture beta having a very small mouth, like a child biting into a 5-pound Hershey bar. It's not going to be able to do very much work, and it's going to take a lot longer for it to work. It also doesn't like heat and "dies" or gets broken at higher mash temperatures.

    So, you want to hit a mash temp where both the alpha and beta can work together. The alpha breaks things up coursely, and the beta handles the smaller detail work that some would say is the more important of the two. I find that 150 F does the job very nicely -- not too cold for alpha and not too hot for beta. Plus it's a nice round number that's easy to remember!

    Key points and ideas:

    If you mash too hot, your beta will die fast and your resulting beer will be more dextrinous, full bodied, etc. However you can mash very fast if you don't care about beta. You'll have tons of complex sugars produced in the mash in just 10-20 minutes. Your efficiency will look awesome, but your yeast won't be able to eat very much of it. Attenuation will suffer. You might expect 75% attenuation but only hit 60%.

    If you mash too cold, the alpha won't be working very fast. In this case, you might end up with a beer that's too starchy, so it's not very sweet, very cloudy, and again might be full bodied. You can do a really long rest for like 2 hours at like 146 F and get a very good dry beer, it's just that both the beta and alpha work pretty slowly at this temperature so most people don't play much in this area. However you can experiment if you want a super dry beer. For instance you could try activating your alpha at 155 F for just 5-10 minutes, then drop the temperature down to 145 F before the beta all dies for another 90 minutes to theoretically result in a very bone dry beer. So with the same malt bill and same yeast that normally hits 75% attenuation, maybe you could hit 85% or who knows. You can play with it.

    That's what I know, in layman's terms.
     
    machalel, Crackerbarrel and Wanda like this.
  7. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Agree with much of the above. However...

    As much as possible implies the most fermentable wort possible, which could be the goal in some cases, but not usually.
     
    machalel likes this.
  8. koopa

    koopa Initiate (0) Apr 20, 2008 New Jersey

    I miss having him as the president of my homebrew club. Intelligent, great speaker, great educator, and incredibly dedicated / driven homebrewer during those years.
     
    dmtaylor and FeDUBBELFIST like this.
  9. dmtaylor

    dmtaylor Savant (1,149) Dec 30, 2003 Wisconsin

    And I thought *I* was nitpicky.....
     
  10. Crackerbarrel

    Crackerbarrel Initiate (0) Feb 10, 2014 New York

    THIS sentence is the piece I was missing...I was just always thinking that if you mash higher, the beta will be creating just as much fermentable wort, you'd just have alpha active as well.

    But if the beta 'dies' then that clarifies everything for me.

    Havent had a chance to check out that video too, but will so before brewing. Thanks everyone.
     
    GreenKrusty101 and dmtaylor like this.
  11. dmtaylor

    dmtaylor Savant (1,149) Dec 30, 2003 Wisconsin

    It's an excellent video and says the same thing as I did with more technical detail.
     
    GreenKrusty101 likes this.
  12. GreenKrusty101

    GreenKrusty101 Initiate (0) Dec 4, 2008 Nevada

    I don't trust any hotshot that doesn't know the difference between "brake" and "break". : )


    This...is why thermometer accuracy and mash tun heat conservation is critical
     
    GavinHarper likes this.
  13. GreenKrusty101

    GreenKrusty101 Initiate (0) Dec 4, 2008 Nevada

    I just wish people would refer to enzymes denaturing...and NOT dying...could give some people the wrong idea.
     
  14. Crackerbarrel

    Crackerbarrel Initiate (0) Feb 10, 2014 New York

    I put 'dying' in quotes for that very reason...and now I know denaturing...FOR THE WIN

    Speaking of thermometers...I'm not at all a fan of the regular food thermometers people still swear by. Seeing as I'm only making my first all grain batch this wknd, I don't want to shell out more $$ on things like a thermopen until I'm sure I'm going to stick with this hobby (or 2 more batches, whichever comes first).

    Is this just as suitable? Its a lot less expensive...

    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0..._m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_r=0XXY0Z2N12DA3QT261GH
     
    GreenKrusty101 likes this.
  15. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    I haven't used that one, but spec-wise it's a little slower and a little less accurate. And it's not quite as highly rated. I own two thermapens, but if I needed a third, I might be tempted to give that thermowand a try. The probe looks a bit shorter too though, and I will say that there are times when my probe length is nearly maxed out. Yes, I said it.

    So is it "just as suitable?" I'd say no. But it might be good enough.
     
  16. guyg

    guyg Initiate (0) Jun 24, 2014 Washington

    I usually step mash as described in Noonan's "brewing Lager Beer" by mashing at 148 F 30 minutes, followed by 156F fore an hour. I then mash out at 170. It sea to give a fermentable wort with a drinkable malt profile. It strikes a nice balance of alpha and beta amalayse conditions.
     
    GreenKrusty101 likes this.
  17. JackHorzempa

    JackHorzempa Grand Pooh-Bah (3,375) Dec 15, 2005 Pennsylvania
    Society Pooh-Bah

    @FeDUBBELFIST, thanks for that video. It was EXCELLENT!!

    Cheers to Bobby from NJ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
    FeDUBBELFIST likes this.
  18. VikeMan

    VikeMan Grand Pooh-Bah (3,067) Jul 12, 2009 Pennsylvania
    Pooh-Bah

    Nitpicky? I dunno. Controlling wort fermentability is the biggest reason people plan/talk about mash temps in the first place. It's not like it's a minor detail.
     
  19. PortLargo

    PortLargo Pooh-Bah (1,831) Oct 19, 2012 Florida
    Pooh-Bah

    As you've picked up in the replies, temperature control is important. You can get an econ digital thermometer from Thermoworks for under 20 bucks (search Amazon). These guys are just about as accurate as their Big Expensive Brother, they are just slower (~5 secs). You can get good results from them.

    You didn't ask, but be aware on your first all grain mash of hot/cold spots in the mash tun. After an initial stir you can still measure a 5-7° difference in grain temps from one side of the tun to the other. The solution is to stir, stir, then stir some more. My recommendation: use a calibrated thermo and have a well-rested stir arm before you add the strike water. If you're off just a couple of degrees the fermentability of the wort changes; which changes the type sugars presented to the yeast, which changes how much alcohol is created, which changes how much residual sugars is left over, which changes . . . well, you get the idea.

    There are several online strike-water-mash calculators which help, but expect some trial and error with temps until you have your system zero'ed in. For sure have an extra 1-2 quarts of boiling water standing by for low temps and a bowl of ice if error'ed on the high side.
     
    #19 PortLargo, Feb 15, 2015
    Last edited: Feb 15, 2015
  20. Crackerbarrel

    Crackerbarrel Initiate (0) Feb 10, 2014 New York

    Awe
    Awesome, good to know, thanks. After today's brewing (my first all grain, second overall), I learned a lot....especially about preparation, but also about everything else that can go wrong.

    Looking forward to trying it all again, with a much revised plan.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.